User talk:Kayvon2008

August 2019[edit]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, BigFatButthead, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kayvon2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

iPadOS13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

No. Pick a different, more appropriate, username. Yamla (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kayvon2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PageMaster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

That username is already in use. You can check to see if a username is already in use via Special:CentralAuth. Yamla (talk) 15:05, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Kayvon2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kayvon2008

Accept reason:

Renamed. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:57, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

Yee

Your sandbox[edit]

Please don't screw around with unblock templates. They go into a queue for admins to review. When you add them inappropriately to a page, it clogs up the queue. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:51, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Kayvon2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Main page have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Testing! Kayvon2008 (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kayvon2008, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:00, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Kayvon2008[edit]

Hello, Kayvon2008. You have new messages at Kayvon2008's talk page.
Message added 04:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Testing! Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at T. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Testing! Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at T, you may be blocked from editing. Testing! Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at T. TTesting! Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at T, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TTesting! Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report about E (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Testing! Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at T shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Testing! Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User talk:Kayvon2008[edit]

User talk:Kayvon2008, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Kayvon2008 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Kayvon2008 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kayvon2008 (talk) 04:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:26, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UnBlock![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kayvon2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry, i just had to get used to this editor. i will add many pages and images. Kayvon2008 (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 20:33, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dkkdoe[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kayvon2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I WILL do more useful things in the future. sorry for messing arrorund. Kayvon2008 (talk) 02:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC) Kayvon2008 (talk) 02:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe what actions led to your block and what you will do instead. What constructive edits would you make? -- Dloh cier ekim 03:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user contributes using an
iPad.

U[edit]

Kayvon2008 (talk) 20:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

N[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kayvon2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry 😐, I will make a lot of pages and templates, and upload a lot of images. I will also “steal” pages from other wikis. Bye. If you appeal me, I will send you some WikiLove. Kayvon2008 (talk) 02:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

— JJMC89 (T·C) 03:47, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{{info}}}