User talk:Keenan Fernandes

August 2021

Hello, I'm JPxG. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bhayandar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. jp×g 09:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhayandar. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bhayandar was changed by Keenan Fernandes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897471 on 2021-08-25T10:07:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vasai, you may be blocked from editing. Jurtaa (talk) 10:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vasai. Jurtaa (talk) 10:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Vasai Creek—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 07:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ambarnath, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kalyan. - Arjayay (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The info I add in Wikipedia is correct, so kindly let me know why is my info being removed.... Being an admin doesn't mean that u will misuse ur right by deleting my info whenever u wish.... As per me I don't find my info wrong. Instead Vandalism is done by you Arjayay.... Misuse of Power as an admin is a rude act by You So even if I am blocked I don't care

Keenan Fernandes (talk) 14:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dahisar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Western and In. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

I have reverted a few of your edits, at Naigaon, for overlinking - so I have come to explain the reason.
As explained at ‎ WP:OVERLINKING we do not add circular links back to the same page, and we only link the first use of a term in an article, and we do not normally link:-

Everyday words understood by most readers.
Names familiar to most readers, including;- major countries, major cities, major languages, major nationalities/ethnicities and major religions
Common units of measurement and dates

There are many articles where these are already, incorrectly, linked; however, city, north, south, east and west are clearly common words, and are not capitalized (unless they are at the beginning of a sentence) and India is a major country, so should not be linked - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 15:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of Template:Infobox settlement

I have reverted your edit on Vasai and would like to explain it here because it seems you might need to read the documentation on the infobox template for settlement.

name is the name of the place, so you shouldn't be putting a link to the Vasai Road Railway Station in place of the town's name.
settlement_type is just for its type (City, Town, Village, Hamlet, Municipality, Reservation, etc) so you shouldn't have written City in Palghar. Also, you shouldn't overlink "City" and "in" since they are extremely common words.

Please read Template:Infobox settlement to understand its usage in more details. Aithus (talk) 07:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

City & Palghar are not common words as they both have different meanings. A City is a Large & Important Town whereas Palghar is a District that covers the areas from Naigaon to Dahanu Road. Keenan Fernandes (talk) 07:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Info Added by me for Vasai in Wikipedia was valid as explained above. Further it's upto You whether to agree or disagree with the above explaination by me. Keenan Fernandes (talk) 07:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain how putting the link to the Vasai Road railway station as the settlement place name be valid?

Please note that my comment about overlinking doesn't say anything about Palghar, only for city and in.

Also, if you use colon(s) in front of your edit on this page, it will be much easier to read our conversation thread. See Wikipedia:Indentation Aithus (talk) 07:40, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think adding a link for certain terms in Wikipedia should make any difference, as the link helps people to get directed to the website directly to know more about something. Keenan Fernandes (talk) 07:45, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that not everyone has the same opinion on everything. But Wikipedia has a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. Aithus (talk) 07:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ya right so if u feel so then it's ok I have no issues. Keenan Fernandes (talk) 07:51, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Naigaon, you may be blocked from editing.
You have repeatedly been told not to link common words, such as "city", not to link back to the same artilce, to only link the first use and only use a simple settlement type such as city. - Arjayay (talk) 12:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its You (Arjayay) who vandalizes Wikipedia. Coz I always have added correct info in Wikipedia. Whereas u have always been removing the right info I add in Wikipedia that is very Wrong. U have no right to remove my added info. Coz many other Wikipedia editors too make changes like me in Wikipedia wherever required. Keenan Fernandes (talk) 16:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Borivali, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The info I add in Wikipedia is always right. I don't know why do you (Arjayay) have a problem with my added info always. As a Wikipedia Editor, I have full right to make changes in Wikipedia i.e add accurate info & remove unwanted info in Wikipedia. You have no right to send me any warnings of Blocking me whenever u wish. Coz if u do so it means that u have a personal grudge with me on Wikipedia. Keenan Fernandes (talk) 16:34, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]