User talk:Kevleyski

No worries

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Pyrmont Brewery circa 1880 from Pyrmont Bridge (towards Pyrmont).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pyrmont Brewery circa 1880 from Pyrmont Bridge (towards Pyrmont).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyrmont Brewery (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pyrmont Brewery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pyrmont Brewery, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevleyski! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DannyS712 (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyrmont Brewery (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vQ195P_Pi9yvdBtV_PkECqyT6-WRqu7PtfmPjZzXKHy7hYJPV6P5VQFrWqhdtnohslk4T0OZ7LO0S7r/pub?slide=id.g79cfb57841f257d3_1. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Pyrmont Brewery may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep these are "written using your own words and structure" it's not copyrighted material - from me

AfC notification: Draft:Pyrmont Brewery has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pyrmont Brewery. Thanks! Zeromonk (talk) 08:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Quick summary with respect to copyright around this article - those slides are all my own work I can assure you there is no violation going on here The 1880s photo is well out of copyright and searching for it has

I don’t think we should just let history die

Also why is adding articles so hard - say I was elderly on a computer - there is a real barrier here for content that will get lost

I’m an absolute supporter of Creative Commons, and yes have to be carful around ‘fair use’ and so on - but I’m also in favour of if no one is complaining then let it go - this way it becomes self moderating - denying any new article is not beneficial to anyone that might be able to contribute or improve the article or hey my great grandad took that picture here’s the original etc....

(sorry for the rant, I appreciate it’s not easy)

Kev Lambert (talk) 18:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyrmont Brewery (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pyrmont Brewery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pyrmont Brewery, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t understand why an article seed can not be planted here for others to add any info they might have on a brewery in the late 1880s

This is Australian brewing history Kev Lambert (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pyrmont Brewery

Hello, Kevleyski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pyrmont Brewery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Too sad Nothing wrong with this article Kev Lambert (talk) 06:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Drink while you think

Hello, Kevleyski

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EchidnaLives, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Drink while you think, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|EchidnaLives}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have added references, its great well known game and has value to be included for prosterity Kev Lambert (talk) 10:09, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you want to create an article, but unfortunately this is an unencyclopedic topic, and hasn't got a lot of coverage other than guides on how to play the game. However, acknowledging you are contesting it, I have not readded the proposed deletion tag, and have nominated it for AfD (Articles for Deletion), where people discuss this topic and whether deletion is appropriate. Now, the community can decide. You can see the notice below. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, echidnaLives - talk - edits 10:23, 24 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

No problem but let’s consider to remove the other drinking games in this case, I just used them as a template for one that I knew to be popular Kev Lambert (talk) 11:05, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand using other articles as a template, however the main problem was citations. Here's a comparison between the Drink while you think article and Never have I ever:

Drink while you think:

https://drinkinggamezone.com/drinking-games/drink-while-you-think - Guide to the game is not significant coverage

https://www.glasswithatwist.com/articles/the-name-game.html - Guide to the game is not significant coverage

https://matadornetwork.com/read/drinking-games-can-play-bar/ - Slight mention and rules are not significant coverage

https://www.barnonedrinks.com/games/t/think-while-you-drink-19.html - Guide to the game is not significant coverage

Never have I ever:

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Ping-pong,+endurance,+card,+and+other+types+of+drinking+games:+are+...-a0165912679 - Article by the Journal of Alcohol & Drug Education, all about topic and reliable, significant coverage

https://flathatnews.com/2007/03/25/ten-reasons-not-hook-drunk/ - Mentions simple rules of game, doesn't contribute to significant coverage but does back up a claim in the article.

https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150526/lakeview/cards-against-humanity-puts-kibosh-on-under-guns-show-theater/ - Major Chicago news outlet, significant coverage and backs up claim.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/elmhurst/community/chi-ugc-article-never-have-i-ever-improv-at-under-the-gun-the-2015-06-02-story.html - Significant coverage, another major outlet, reliable.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rMBhQIx-U4 - Youtube is generally unreliable, but this backs up a claim about the movie, considered reliable and significant coverage (in context of article).

I must clarify, I am not doing writing this to try and prove you wrong. It's because, looking at your edits, you're an editor with a lot of promise. You have made good contributions, and I trust that, with guidance, you could become a great article writer!

Another thing I would like to say is: The articles for deletion process is not immediate. Neither is proposed deletion. They both take a week, and with AfD, it could go on for longer. Therefore, if there is significant coverage, you can add it to the article, and the discussion could result in WP:HEY, when a nominated article for deletion is improved before the end of the discussion, and is subsequently kept. Alternatively, you could request that it is moved to the draft namespace, where the article can be worked on before coming back into the main part of Wikipedia. (If the article ends up being deleted, you can get it undeleted to the draft space at WP:REFUND)

If you do choose to improve the article, I wish you good luck. If the article gets deleted, I would encourage you to continue working on other articles and areas, unless you want to request undeletion as I said above. And, of course, the community could still decide to keep it. We'll see what consensus emerges.

If you have any questions, I would encourage you to let me know through {{ping}}, or drop a message at my talk page, and I'll help you out. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 11:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)>[reply]

Nomination of Drink while you think for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drink while you think is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drink while you think until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 10:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]