User talk:Theresonly1zlatan
Welcome
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
King Philip V of Spain, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi King Philip V of Spain! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Map
[edit]The map is actually hosted on the "sister" project of commons. Commons is a central repository for many of the images Wikipedia (for all of its languages) uses. Any errors would need to be raised there on the talk page. Aboutmovies (talk) 15:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
end of county of barcelona
[edit]I used "rollback" on two of your edits because they were very similar to the edits made by User:Santos30, a user who has been blocked from both the Spanish and the English wikipedia for pushing this line of thought. Please accept my excuses if you are not Santos30.
Before restoring the date of 1714 in County of Barcelona, provide reliable sources in Talk:Crown_of_Castile#1715_or_1716.3F. I left a comment there. --Enric Naval (talk) 18:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
About Recapture of Bahia User:Provocateur was undoing a edit that was made several months ago[1]. The author was most probably Santos30, a biased user who tried to exaggerate the importance of the Crown of Castile and minimize the importance of the Crown of Spain. The correct version is the version restored by Provocateur. Again, sorry for using rollback without checking your other edits first. --Enric Naval (talk) 18:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Lepanto edits
[edit]I'm also in favor of a more compact infobox, but I think you should try to be more neutral in your comments, particularly your recent revert.[2] Even if you disagree, you should asssume good faith and not refer to different opinions of how articles should be written as "destructive". Comment on content, not the contributor.
Peter Isotalo 11:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Seven Years War Infobox flags
[edit]KP, I wanted to stop by and let you know why I reverted your edits to the Seven Years War article, since it looks like you may be new. The issue of flags in article infoboxes has been a contentious one, but the Manual of Style expresses a preference for not putting flags in infoboxes at all. Additionally, you get a problem with flags being ahistorical or anachronistic, which is what complicates the Austrian issue.
The Austrian red-white-red flag has been used for Austria since the 14th century, but "Austria" was not the only province of the Habsburg Empire that was involved in this war. When the "Austrians" were involved in a battle, it was actually Austrians, Bohemians, Tyroleans, Carinthians, Carniolans, Hungarians, Croats, etc. who fought in their units. To my knowledge, each would have used the flag of their domain to represent their "national" allegiance. Additionally, the Habsburg black-yellow flag has not been billed as anything other than a civil flag until the 19th century. It may be worth it to use the Holy Roman Emperor's standard, which surely the Austrian army would have employed as their universal identifier, but that brings about complications (in that the other states of the Holy Roman Empire weren't exactly contributing troops to the conflict). Since WP:INFOBOXFLAG indicates a preference for not having flags, my vote tends to be to eliminate all the flags from the Infobox for uniformity. Thank you for your edits. Cdtew (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Greek War of Independence
[edit]Hi, I had reverted your previous revert on the Greek War of Independence for this reason:
- The First Hellenic Republic was created on January 1822, but the Greek War of Independence had started almost a year earlier, in February-March 1821. As it can be seen on the paint in the Greek War of Independence infobox, until the creation of the First Hellenic Republic, most Greek rebels used the so-called Greek revolution flag mainly, as well as a variety of other flags (some "warlords" or rebel leaders had their own flags). So, that flag must be included to show that, previously to the creation of the First Hellenic Republic, there were Greek rebel forces fighting against their enemies. Otherwise, the infobox would not have sense, as it would state that during almost a year (1821-1822), the Ottoman Empire was fighting against no one. Regards,--HCPUNXKID (talk) 17:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cilicia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- In the 13th century BC, a major population shift occurred as the [[Sea Peoples]] (who may have been the ancestors of the [[Philistines]], [[Sicily|Sicilians]], [[Tyrrhenians]], [[
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars involving Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravenstein. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, King Philip V of Spain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, King Philip V of Spain. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Theresonly1zlatan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Operation Barbarossa
[edit]Hello, I've just reverted your edits to the Operation Barbarossa article as they appeared to be long stings of ( characters. I note that you've made similar edits previously and self reverted them as having been accidental - I reverted as vandalism, but suspect it actually wasn't on looking at your edits. I'm not sure what causes this, but would suggest that you look into it. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 07:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)