Jump to content

User talk:Kingofthedead/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Qualcomm Allplay

Qualcomm Allplay platform has been speedy deleted, I have similarly tagged sonos from which the article was derived, let's see consistency in action. Mgillespie (talk) 08:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Since it is a very old page (from 2007) it could simply be reverted to the original, before the promotional content was added, as the company does seem notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article. MB298 (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Do my understanding is, that becuase you haven't heard of Qualcomm Allplay hardware platform it got deleted, but becuase you have of sonos, thats OK to stay....

I won't be bothering to add content to Wikipedia in future, its simply not wptg the effort when someone else comes along and tramples over it

barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For quickly and efficiently creating Ammon Bundy in response to current events. LavaBaron (talk) 01:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

American date formats

Hi, MB. I noticed that you reviewed the new Katie Fraine article, which employs incorrectly formatted dates for an article written in American English. I would be grateful if you and your fellow new article reviewers would be more conscious of the date formats used in the main body text, infobox, and footnotes. Articles written in American English about American subjects should employ American-style MDY date formats (e.g., January 1, 2015), not British/international-style DMY date formats (e.g., 1 January 2015). There is a limited exception for articles about American military history subjects, which sometimes employ DMY dates. You reviewers are on the front lines of dealing with new users, and gentle guidance could help them get it right, rather than waiting for more experienced editors to correct these articles. Please spread the word. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. I will make sure to take note of this in the future. MB298 (talk) 00:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the review

Thanks for the review and for initiating the talk for Revelation 21. JohnThorne (talk) 00:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your miscellaneous subpage

I suggest that you remove the Tyler entry from there. It could be considered a BLP vio. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

I removed it. MB298 (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joe Biden presidential campaign, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://ballotpedia.org/Joe_Biden_possible_presidential_campaign,_2016.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

This issue was resolved and found not to be a copyvio. MB298 (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Huckabee presidential campaign for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Huckabee presidential campaign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Huckabee presidential campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CatcherStorm talk 09:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #191

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Not sure that SF BoS needs a party-affiliation diagram

Hi MB298. I see that you created a party affiliation diagram and added it to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. This seems a little unnecessary to me. Firstly, SF supervisors are elected on a non-partisan basis, so listing political groups or showing them visually doesn't make much sense. Also, as you can see all 11 members happen to be registered Democrats, and that's been the case for quite a while. If you don't mind I'll remove the graphic and the misleading "Political groups: Democratic Party (11)" statement. Aside from this instance, though, thanks for creating these for other bodies that do have partisan elections. Rupert Clayton (talk) 20:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

barnstar

The Malheur Occupation Barnstar

For exceptional and tireless work on the Malheur article from day one. LavaBaron (talk) 05:14, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaine Cooper

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaine Cooper. Thanks. Reinoutr (talk) 07:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC) --07:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ward (sheriff)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ward (sheriff). Thanks. Reinoutr (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

Don't decide what's notable & what's racist

I am talking about the Korean eyes. It's an ethnological fact that is an existing topic of significant fact (hence notable). Also, being racial & being racist are 2 different concepts. You are warned for article obstruction. Wikibreaking (talk) 03:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

I tagged the article for cleanup. MB298 (talk) 03:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
That shouldn't be decided by you. 1. The neutrality of this article has been questioned. All I did was quoting academic books on Ethnology. 2. The notability of this article was claimed. It is an existing topic of significant facts, hence it is notable. Quoting on notability, ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail" & "The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability 3. The validity of the sources were questioned. They are all legitimate books on Ethnology. All valid.

Wikibreaking (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Metlifecare

Many thanks for the assistance and kind words for the Metlifecare article! PragmaticOutcome (talk) 03:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

List of mayors of Washington, D.C.

Why did you revert my edit to this? The table that was given had the exact same information right below it, I felt that it was obviously misplaced. Thanks DoomLexus (talk) 07:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Feel free to ignore this, I understand the table now -- sorry for removing it!! I acted in good faith, didn't mean to edit harmfully. DoomLexus (talk) 16:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
All is well. MB298 (talk) 17:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #192

17:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Korean eyes listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Korean eyes. Since you had some involvement with the Korean eyes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mkdwtalk 18:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Note about the no content tag

Please wait at least 10 minutes before putting up the tag, it is frowned upon to put one up the second a article starts. Thanks. Wgolf (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Wesley Matthews

I just wanted to expand a little bit on this. Jimmy Butler once had this atrocious picture in the infobox and it was agreed upon that the picture was lowering the quality of the article so "any picture is better than no picture" is not always true. Even if it's not in the infobox, it's still not giving the article anything. If you want to start a discussion on it, feel free. I just wanted to mention the Jimmy Butler situation because it's very similar. You can't put all that in an edit summary! —DangerousJXD (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

16:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #193

Until the day I die (film) delete flag

Hi,

I'm new to Wikipedia and wanted to set a skeleton frame for the article on the film - I'm in touch with the director and producer of the film so all the information will be press material. Can I recreate the page since the original deleted one didn't have this info and I took too long in publishing it?


Thanks! Lrtorres (talk) 21:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Before you recreate the article, you'll want to make sure it satisfies the film notability criteria. Make sure you cite several reliable sources as well. MB298 (talk) 00:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The film itself is an independent production and was released in a niche cable channel (Cine Latino), not sure how the notability rules will apply but it hasn't garnered many reviews yet. However, the production is complete as of January 2016.

Thanks! 104.179.214.194 (talk) 05:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as President Trump, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix (talk) 02:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: Page was redirect. MB298 (talk) 04:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Curaçao\ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix (talk) 04:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: Page was redirect. MB298 (talk) 04:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Ammon Bundy caricature

I've removed the caricature image you added. Unless the caricature itself is a subject of the article, adding it constitutes editorializing, which goes against Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy. -- The Anome (talk) 12:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trumpa

A tag has been placed on Trumpa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

Ammon Bundy Page

Hi MB298, Thanks for the welcome. I really appreciate it. With regards to the Ammon Bundy page, I added "domestic terrorist" based on the US law Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I - CRIMES CHAPTER 113B - TERRORISM Sec. 2331 (5) (B) (ii) which states that "to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion" based on his actions at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge for which has been arrested. This is in compliance with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xanekka (talkcontribs) 18:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

I do agree that Bundy should technically be called a domestic terrorist, but on the Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge page it has been generally established that they are militants or something along those lines (I guess he would be both). Keep in mind your edits must adhere to the WP:BLP and probably will be reverted at some point if other editors don't think it follows that policy. MB298 (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Then can we state in the article that definition of a militant and a domestic terrorist both applies to Bundy? As it stands now, both would be accurate and as the story develops, we or other editors can continue to edit. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xanekka (talkcontribs) 18:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

DS alert AP

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Just an FYI... I sent one to myself also. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Lutz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #194

21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3pac. Since you had some involvement with the 3pac redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #195

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

MyIntent Project

MB298, thanks for connecting about the MyIntent page. Here's some more context in case it's helpful? Let me know if you need any other info. The project has made an impact in the lives of over 25,000 individuals and has an ever larger community that is growing quickly. It is a collaborative project that is here to stay over the long term. It has already carved its own slice in American culture, by being featured on The Today Show and the cover of Time Magazine.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1521:121:DB3:3D79:BC0C:CAF0 (talkcontribs)

Barnstar

Thank you for the barnstar last week. :) Can you believe the occupation is over? CaseyPenk (talk) 04:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

16:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #196

Wikidata weekly summary #196

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #197

Wikidata weekly summary #186

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 7

Newsletter • February 2016

This month:

One database for Wikipedia requests

Development of the extension for setting up WikiProjects, as described in the last issue of this newsletter, is currently underway. No terribly exciting news on this front.

In the meantime, we are working on a prototype for a new service we hope to announce soon. The problem: there are requests scattered all across Wikipedia, including requests for new articles and requests for improvements to existing articles. We Wikipedians are very good at coming up with lists of things to do. But once we write these lists, where do they end up? How can we make them useful for all editors—even those who do not browse the missing articles lists, or the particular WikiProjects that have lists?

Introducing Wikipedia Requests, a new tool to centralize the various lists of requests around Wikipedia. Requests will be tagged by category and WikiProject, making it easier to find requests based on what your interests are. Accompanying this service will be a bot that will let you generate reports from this database on any wiki page, including WikiProjects. This means that once a request is filed centrally, it can syndicated all throughout Wikipedia, and once it is fulfilled, it will be marked as "complete" throughout Wikipedia. The idea for this service came about when I saw that it was easy to put together to-do lists based on database queries, but it was harder to do this for human-generated requests when those requests are scattered throughout the wiki, siloed throughout several pages. This should especially be useful for WikiProjects that have overlapping interests.

The newsletter this month is fairly brief; not a lot of news, just checking in to say that we are hard at work and hope to have more for you soon.

Until next time,

Harej (talk) 01:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

VisualEditor News #1—2016

Elitre (WMF), 19:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Jackson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Request for Comment: Marco Rubio

There is an ongoing RfC at Talk: Marco Rubio which you may care to weigh in on.   Spartan7W §   15:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Spartan7W:  Done. MB298 (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks!   Spartan7W §   01:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #198

Hillary C listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hillary C. Since you had some involvement with the Hillary C redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 03:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Mr. Trump listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mr. Trump. Since you had some involvement with the Mr. Trump redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 03:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Mr. Obama listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mr. Obama. Since you had some involvement with the Mr. Obama redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Back Obama listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Back Obama. Since you had some involvement with the Back Obama redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Greece. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greece.. Since you had some involvement with the Greece. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Mexicp listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mexicp. Since you had some involvement with the Mexicp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Broo, listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Broo,. Since you had some involvement with the Broo, redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Jerseu listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jerseu. Since you had some involvement with the Jerseu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)