User talk:Listowy

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Listowy, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary
Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
Take a look at Consensus of standards
Create a User page
Be bold
Ignore all rules

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alf 14:51, 28 August 2005 (UTC).[reply]

... Thank You for some tips - I will do my best:). Best wishes, Listowy.

Zapraszam

Wikipedia:Polish Wikipedians' notice board--Witkacy 00:55, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj Witkacy !

Musze przyznac, ze znalazlem pod podanym adresem interesujace projekty, mozliwe, ze uda mi sie cos wniesc do tego wspolnego dziela. Niedawno postanowilem sie zarejstrowac i od tego czasu pracuje nad kat. "Polska nauka i technologia", ktorej jeszcze kilka dni temu wcale nie bylo. Na razie to drobne fragmenty. Obecnie mysle nad dodaniem do tego folderu informacji nt "Polskiego programu sztucznego serca". Czas pokaze. Pozdrawiam

Czesc Listowy, fajnie ze sie zabrales za ta tematyke - co do strony Poland.gov.pl material z niej moze byc uzywany, zerknij na [1]. Pozdrawiam--Witkacy 13:12, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć

Pisząc artykuły w nazwach własnych używaj polskich liter (jak to jest np. w Poznań) robiąc jednocześnie redirecty takie jak Poznan. Pozdrawiam Radomil talk 22:21, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cipher Bureau

Nice to hear from you. Couple of questions:

1. Was the Biuro Szyfrów Russian-cryptology section actually designated, analogously to the German section, as B.S.-3?

2. Do you know of substantial sources on the Russian-cryptology section? I'd be interested in reading them and perhaps summarizing them for Wiki.

3. Did you see MattCrypto's suggestion on the Template:Cipher Bureau discussion page? logologist 03:01, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1.BS1 – cipher section, BS2 – radio intelligence section, BS3 – Russian section, BS4 – German section. In France, rest of the BS that manage to cross the border was designate as ‘’Section Z’’

2. Maybe this one would be helpful: dr.Grzegorz Nowik ZANIM ZŁAMANO ENIGMĘ. POLSKI RADIOWYWIAD PODCZAS WOJNY Z BOLSZEWICKĄ ROSJĄ 1918-1920.

3. I have just read his suggestion. However, so far, I don't have any information about periods of employment in sections.

What do you think about that?

SUB ART ( connected with BS4)

Cipher Bureau edit
Section 4 (German)
Personnel:
Chief of German section:
Maksymilian Ciężki
Mathematician-cryptologists:
Marian Rejewski Jerzy Różycki Henryk Zygalski
Others:
Antoni Palluth ?
Devices:
Enigma "doubles" Grill Clock Cyclometer and Card catalog Cryptologic bomb Zygalski (perforated) sheets

SUB ART ( connected with BS3)

Cipher Bureau edit
Section 3 (Russian)
Personnel:
Chief of Russian section:
Jan Graliński
Cryptologists:
Jan Graliński Piotr Smoleński ?
Others:
?

MAIN ART

Cipher Bureau edit
Introduction:
Chief of Cipher Bureau:
Gwido Langer
Deputy Chief of Cipher Bureau:
Maksymilian Ciężki
Sections:
Section 3 (Russian) Section 4 (German)

Best wishes, Listowy 20:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added Sections 1 and 2 to Template:Cipher Bureau.

Was Section 1 responsible for maintaining Polish ciphers and codes?

yes

Was Section 2 responsible for radio monitoring (supervised by Ciężki)?

correct

Were there a total of 4 sections?

Were the four "sections" actually called that in Polish (sekcja)?

Some sources say ‘’sekcje’’, some ‘’referaty’’ , but according to all : 4 sections

Where did you find the information about the Cipher Bureau's structure?

'i.e. Link they use sekcje

When and by whom was Nowik's book published? logologist 02:28, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ZANIM ZŁAMANO ENIGMĘ... Oficyna Wydawnicza RYTM,2005 ’’’ Link

Listowy 07:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rejewski diagrams

Could you get diagrams of the cryptological bomb and Zygalski sheets for the Cipher Bureau article from Marian Rejewski's papers? logologist 06:32, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zygalski sheet diagram.jpg Listowy 07:29, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pałac Saski

Thanks for the above information. Rejewski's "bomb" and "sheets" diagrams appeared in Kozaczuk's book on Enigma.

Do you by any chance know of a way to restore the illustration to Pałac Saski that Lupo has just deleted? logologist 09:10, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't restore that image, but I uploaded new one. May it be? Listowy 16:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jak najbardziej. Dziękuję! logologist 02:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for the "perforated sheet" illustration — apparently the first on the Wikipedia. It should help people get a concrete feel for the thing.

As for the (constructive) suggestion of placing individuals' employment periods in Template:Cipher Bureau, I think we may count ourselves lucky that any of the personnel survived the war — at least, to 1974 — and left us as much information as we do have. It is often forgotten that the Poles were overrun and had to destroy files. (In some cases when they failed to do so, people died as a result.) logologist 08:42, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Bomb" illustration

Have you by any chance had an opportunity to try to track down the bomba kryptologiczna diagram in Marian Rejewski's papers? It would be well to place a copy in the "Bomba (cryptography)" article.

Best regards. logologist 03:10, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:‘Cryptologic bomb’ machine - drawing from M.Rejewski’s papers.jpg Listowy 20:20, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the diagrams of the 3 Polish cryptologic devices. I had long been hoping they could be obtained for Wiki. They make a world of difference. Thanks! logologist 23:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome. I have also found an illustration of Lacida-Polish cipher machine, so I thought that it would be good idea to add it to the Lacida article. It also needs a description, like you have done with previous diagrams. Best wishes, 08:45, 10 October 2005 Listowy(UTC)

Thanks from me, too — cheers! I don't suppose you could put copyright and source information on those images, though? — Matt Crypto 18:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

All these diagrams, direct connect with Enigma, are reproduction of Rejewski's pictures. Therefore I'm not sure which tag should be used: PD-Poland or Fair-Use ... Any suggestion:)? Listowy 09:07, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please email me at Logologist — "E-mail this user"? Thanks. logologist 22:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Linking your email with Wikipedia "enables others to contact you through your user or user-talk page without the need of revealing your identity" (see "Preferences" at top of your "User" page). logologist 21:19, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay:). E-mail sent. Listowy 09:07, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

tank:template

I've rv'ed your additional fields. If you think they should go in then please add the relevant data to each of the articles that uses the template first. There's about 160 of them. GraemeLeggett 20:11, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. In my opinion it is important data, but maybe not essential in the info box, so it can be mentioned in plain text. Best wishes, Listowy 12:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For speed i suggest where the gun has an autoloader try putting it in the infobox armament line eg "155 mm gun wth autoloader" then follow that up by statng the roles under crew eg "3 (driver gunner commander)" GraemeLeggett 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Perforated sheets

Importing the Cryptologic bomb diagram into the Cipher Bureau article was an excellent idea. If it will fit, why not also add the Perforated sheet illustration? logologist 07:15, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In the Cipher Bureau article, could the Cyclometer and Zygalski's "perforated sheet" illustrations be interchanged? (The cyclometer was invented first, about 1934, well before Zygalski's perforated sheets, invented in late 1938.) Also, the perforated-sheet caption should probably read Zygalski's "perforated sheet", in the singular, though linked to "Perforated sheets," in the plural. Regards, logologist 14:40, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Thanks for the wonderful photo of the three cryptologists. It makes their tragedy so much more tangible.

I wanted to add a caption but didn't succeed. Could you try placing it (I would suggest, in all three men's articles)? I propose: "From left: Jan Graliński, Jerzy Różycki, Piotr Smoleński. All three Polish cryptologists would perish in the 1942 Lamoricière disaster." logologist 15:51, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Now it should be OK. I have also added that image to all articles. Listowy 19:57, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PC Bruno and Cadix

What do you think of Matt Crypto's suggestion either to split the "PC Bruno" article into separate "PC Bruno" and "Cadix" articles, or to rename the present article "PC Bruno and Cadix"?

Would it be feasible to blow up the Cadix-staff photo about 4 times, to make the individual faces visible without having to enlarge for each viewing?

Regards, logologist 20:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion: Unless that article is not very long, we shouldn’t split it. I think that renaming it is a better idea. Check your e-mail, please, you should find my proposition of this image. Best wishes, Listowy 09:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blow-up

Thanks for inserting the beautiful Cadix-photo blow-up into the "PC Bruno" article. It's now possible to make out each individual. It makes them more than just abstract names! logologist|Talk 22:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:‘Cryptologic_bomb’_machine_-_drawing_from_M.Rejewski’s_papers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:‘Cryptologic_bomb’_machine_-_drawing_from_M.Rejewski’s_papers.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 20:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:PZL-37 Los.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PZL-37 Los.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Thuresson 12:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ANX

Hi there, just wondered what the "ANX" was that you added to the cipher bureau box? (It's presumably not the "Automotive Network Exchange"!) — Matt Crypto 18:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Of course you are right. The "ANX" was one of the most effective key recovering method. Almost all German messages started from the letters AN followed by X. English TOx (‘x’ as a separator). I have changed that redirection, because we don't have an appropriate article. Best wishes, Listowy 17:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello Listowy! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus talk} 16:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not minor

Please don't mark all of your edits as minor, most of them are not. See: Help:Minor edit.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus talk} 17:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to follow these tips. However sometimes is really hard to estimate whether it is or not:). Best wishes, Listowy 10:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Captured_German_transporter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Captured_German_transporter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Polish_copy_of_Enigma_made_by_Biuro_Szyfrow_.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Polish_copy_of_Enigma_made_by_Biuro_Szyfrow_.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Second World War europe.PNG

This image needs to be corrected. There were no Axis powers before 1940. See Tripartite Pact for details. Mieciu K 11:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check current version. Is there still any way to make this image better?:) Listowy 12:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, but still the Political status of the Czech protectorate and Slovakia should be explained in the "legend" right now they are simply called Germany which is a big simplification. Mieciu K 21:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was another complaint about the fact that the Ukrainian and Belarussian republics are in a different colour than the rest of the USSR, while these soviet republics had some degree of autonomy most people neither know or are interested in this fact. Instead most people get the impression that this map shows the "occupation" of Belarussia and Ukraine. The entire USSR should be in one colour. Mieciu K 17:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Palac_Saski.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Palac_Saski.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biuro Szyfrów

With some effort, this could be a WP:GA indeed.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 17:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Campaignbox Invasion of Poland

A tag has been placed on Template:Campaignbox Invasion of Poland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Cipher Bureau main/temp

A tag has been placed on Template:Cipher Bureau main/temp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review of Biuro Szyfrów

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I have completed the GA review of Biuro Szyfrów, with the review located at Talk:Biuro Szyfrów/GA1. I have put the article on hold for seven days to allow you time to deal with the issues I have outlined on the review page. Please let me know on the review page or on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 13:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Polish_Air_Force.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Polish_Air_Force.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:MK_III_Polish_Mine_Detector.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MK_III_Polish_Mine_Detector.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 05:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biuro Szyfrów

As one of the primary editors of this article I wanted to let you know that someone submitted the Biuro Szyfrów article for GA. I reviewed the article, placed it on hold and left some comments on the talk page. Please let me know if you have any questions. --Kumioko (talk) 02:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gwido Langer Gustave Bertrand Kenneth McFarlan.jpg

The illustration, "File:Gwido Langer Gustave Bertrand Kenneth McFarlan.jpg," which appears in several articles, including "Biuro Szyfrów," may be at risk due to a "deprecated tag." Could the tag be replaced? Nihil novi (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Warszawa - defilada.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Warszawa - defilada.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{Autotranslate|1=File:GROM.jpg|base=Image source/heading}

{Autotranslate|1=File:GROM.jpg|base=Image source}Herr Kriss (talk) 23:59, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dworzec.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dworzec.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biuro Szyfrów - references need improvement

This article, which you've contributed to, needs more references if it is to maintain its GA status. See Talk:Biuro_Szyfrów#Citations_needed. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 22:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mjr Maksymilian Ciężki.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Mjr Maksymilian Ciężki.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Listowy}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Gralinski, Rozycki and Smolenski.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Gralinski, Rozycki and Smolenski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mjr Maksymilian Ciężki.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mjr Maksymilian Ciężki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EP09 Simulator

The article EP09 Simulator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This topic clearly fails WP:GNG - no references, no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Gwido Langer Gustave Bertrand Kenneth McFarlan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Gwido Langer Gustave Bertrand Kenneth McFarlan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DrKiernan (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]