User talk:Medianadia

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Miss Universe 2006 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Miss Universe 2006 was changed by Medianadia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870557 on 2017-05-31T14:50:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Medianadia, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Medianadia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elena Correa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. El cid, el campeador (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Richie Campbell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Binibining Pilipinas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refer to the basic rule of capitalization. Richie Campbell (talk) 12:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Universe 2017. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You saw the note and edit history yet did it anyways, clearly disruptive editing. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 15:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:NOTUSA

Hello, Medianadia. The above-named guidance tells us that the abbreviation "USA" should not be used except when it is the actual part of a quotation or proper name (or in some other technical contexts). Earlier today, you made a series of edits that use "USA" in lists where all other countries in the list are being identified by their full common names. I've reverted your edits, in each case citing MOS:NOTUSA in the edit summary. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Medianadia. I see that you've continued to make these edits. Would you please explain why you think MOS:NOTUSA does not apply? NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello once again. I see that you continue to make these edits and continue to refuse to engage in discussion about them. This is becoming disruptive. Please explain why you think MOS:NOTUSA does not apply to these articles. NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 15:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please conform with the above requests to stop making changes against WP policy. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 15:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:NOTUSA - August 2017

I see that you've returned to making edits that violate MOS:NOTUSA and that you continue to refuse to discuss the matter. If your intention is anything other than disruption, would you please explain why you think MOS:NOTUSA does not apply? NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the fifth time that I am asking you to explain why you think MOS:NOTUSA does not apply to the articles that you have been editing. Will you please provide an answer now? NewYorkActuary (talk) 12:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Slon02 (talk) 02:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:NOTUSA - September 2017

Despite last month's block, I see that you've returned to making edits that violate MOS:NOTUSA. You need to stop doing this. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop violating MOS:NOTUSA. NewYorkActuary (talk) 12:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm 1997kB. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – 1997 kB 10:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logowithboarder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logowithboarder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:NOTUSA - October 2017

You continue to engage in disruptive editing. Please stop now. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Miss Universe 2017 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
If you truly believe that MOS:NOTUSA does not apply to your edits, please join the discussion at Talk:Miss Universe 2017 NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss World 2017. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 20:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Manushi Chhillar.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 12:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding blank lines to tables

You have been reverted enough times to know that other editors are contesting your practice of adding blank lines (for future years) to the titleholders tables of various pageant articles. Please stop doing that. If you feel that these blank lines are beneficial to the articles, I'll be happy to discuss the matter with you. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Miss World 2017. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 17:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPI

Please see:

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dyhp612

K.e.coffman (talk) 02:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Demi-Leigh Nel-Peters. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 03:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over adding blank lines to tables

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miss Honduras. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You have been adding these blank lines to many articles and have had them reverted by several editors. If you truly believe that these articles are improved by having tables with blank lines, please start a discussion on the Talk page of WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Medianadia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conny Notarstefano (LAZIO)

Buon pomeriggio Volevamo avvertire che prima di inserire notizie importanti si è pregati di documentarsi accuratamente. La Sig.na Conny Notarstefano ha PARTECIPATO e VINTO questa edizione 2017 con la regione LAZIO e non con la Puglia come riportato nella casella descrittiva. La sig.na Conny Notarstefano infatti vive e studia a Roma, in Puglia c'è solo nata. In quella casella di colore giallo va specificata REGIONE con la quale ha vinto il titolo di MISS MONDO ITALIA e cioè il LAZIO. Grazie Marco Ciriaci MEDIASEVEN Produzioni Esclusivista MISS MONDO LAZIO

Marco Ciriaci (talk) 14:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.25% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for December:

Seasonal celebrations First ladies Go local #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of AnnLivinova (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 15:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]