User talk:MoyaiViper

Vandalism

Ok, so the first thing you should know about me is that I LOVE vandalism on Wikipedia. Now please don't get the wrong idea. I am not here to vandalize articles or disrupt Wikipedia until I get blocked. I just like to see how people are really creative in their vandalism. I find it kind of funny. Here I will post some of my favorite vandalisms from across the whole site.

lmho: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_Trump&oldid=3837531

Tilt baby tilt: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=890379696

Thats obvious: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huntley,_Nebraska&oldid=5333818

Not the same one: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barry_W._Benson&oldid=1023494897

True: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_Inquisition&oldid=1071287509

This sockpuppet user edited many articles to be nearly all the same. It all happened within 10 minutes and he was blocked soon after: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jake_Moon&oldid=107223139

From Maternal insult

Prevention

You can only prevent this insult by not answering questions that includes the word "Joe" (unless someone in your family is named Joe). If you answer this question, it's game over for you.

From Nyan Cat

Origin

Animated GIF

Nyan cat is a slice of heaven. Before my brother goes s*** in my dogs face he always watches nyan cat. if you dont like nyan cat barney will jump out of your bedroom and kill you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MoyaiViper! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MoyaiViper/sandbox

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:MoyaiViper/sandbox, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to vandalize, I was trying to make a funny article like Wikipedia:My little brother did it. It was just a joke. Sorry. MoyaiViper (talk) 17:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

essay

Anyone know how to submit a humouros essay you want to be an internal wiki article like Wikipedia:My little brother did it, Wikipedia:Go ahead, vandalize, Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you, etc?

Your thread has been archived

Hi MoyaiViper! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, essay, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okey doke MoyaiViper (talk) 18:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoyaiViper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I admit I was mostly only editing on my user pages. I can edit more pages that aren't my user pages if you unblock me please. Also i read the reason I was blocked, for trolling? If i was it was unintentionalMoyaiViper (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please tell what articles you might edit and what you specifically want to do. 331dot (talk) 22:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoyaiViper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Heres what I might edit and what I specifically want to do:I know a lot about some less known bands so I could create articles for some of them that don't have articles, and provide additional info for other ones. I can also fix grammatical errors and spelling errors. I plan on making edits to Moving Gelatine Plates if i get unblocked, i know some info I could probably add about them. MoyaiViper (talk) 01:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declining unblock request since you say you are retiring. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:16, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm retiring since i cant get unblocked {{retired}}

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoyaiViper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for nearly 3 months now, so I thought it would be a good enough time to try to appeal my ban. I admit that in the time I have been blocked, I did use the sockpuppets Moqwerty qwerty qwerty, Moqwertybaby and MoqwertyIsBackBaby (to vandalize because I was ticked off at being blocked. I stopped using those accounts after they got blocked), Redrose43 (which I stopped using after it was blocked) and JollyRancherWest74 to make constructive edits (I have stopped using that account a few weeks ago). I would like to also say that I do not understand my block very well. I was blocked by Bbb23 for the reason "clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, trolling". I can see the "not here to build an encyclopedia" as I was mostly editing my user pages, but I do not understand "trolling". I was blocked very shortly after I started making edits to the other articles. If someone could unblock me, and/or explain my block in more context, that would be great. Thanks, and I hope you appreciate my honesty. MoyaiViper (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on edits like Special:Diff/1089113900, I'd say you lack the maturity to edit English Wikipedia. If you can edit a sister project for six months without causing any trouble, vandalizing, or engaging in any form of sock puppetry or block evasion, we'll consider unblocking you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MoyaiViper (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked and tagged JollyRancherWest74.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate:NinjaRobotPirate if i did not create sockpuppets on this wiki for 6 months would i be unblocked? MoyaiViper (talk) 21:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock 1/29/23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoyaiViper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been (a few days over) 6 months since I last edited Wikipedia. If I am unblocked some edits I will do: I will add info to some articles about lesser known musical bands and fix grammar and spelling errors. I will edit less on my user sandbox. Thank you, Wikipedia staff, for being so considerate in helping me understand why I was blocked and giving me some advice to have a chance of my block being lifted. Hopefully, if my block is lifted, I will be able to build this encyclopedia and be a valuable contributor. Thanks!

Decline reason:

You forgot to point to the other project where you've been editing for at least six months. Yamla (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoyaiViper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't lie, I didn't edit another sister project. I didn't edit on any Wikipedia related projects for 6 months. I would hope that this would be acceptable though, because the edits that I made on my alt JollyRancherWest74 were constructive and the edits on my main account (that weren't in user pages) were constructive.

Decline reason:

While you say you won't lie, the fact that you lied not once but repeatedly during the period of your block renders it impossible for us to believe you. Think of it this way - it suggests that you believe that you being constructive would be enough to not need to comply with any other rules, which is not a behavioural mindset we want to encourage. Nosebagbear (talk) 01:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MoyaiViper (talk) 22:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every single edit by JollyRancherWest74 violated WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. It's a poor choice to claim this was a legitimate alt account (it wasn't, see WP:SOCK) and all the edits were appropriate. --Yamla (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say it was legitimate. I acknowledge it was a sockpuppet account and shouldn't have been used.

You do have a point though, they did violate those policies. I shouldn't have edited under that account in the first place. (But I did get thanked for this edit.) MoyaiViper (talk) 00:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MoyaiViper&oldid=1136565721#Unblock_1/29/23

A random guy said I was blocked in error I just noticed (Since my page was protected)

Check into this guy, looks like hes been doing this on a few other talk pages MoyaiViper (talk) 22:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh whoops hes blocked already sorry MoyaiViper (talk) 22:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock 3/1/23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoyaiViper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge my edits on my sockpuppets were not legitimate. I acknowledge that I should have been editing more on the encyclopedia and not on my user pages. I would really like to be unblocked, I feel like I could add more information to certain articles and contribute positively and not on my user pages. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Closed per above Nosebagbear (talk) 01:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MoyaiViper (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've revoked TPA because the user is doing nothing but screwing arounde with this page. I know I'm leaving the two unblock requests, but I'll let another administrator do what they will with them.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]