User talk:MrKIA11/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

My G5s

Please note that Encyclopedist (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log), the sockmaster of the creator of the pages I'm tagging, was banned in 2006, not today. Sceptre (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Darius Burst Pic....

I found the image here: Shmups Forum

It also can be viewed on this official web site now Famitsu.com.

I honestly don't know about the whole legal thing. All I know is, I've been told that Wikipedia is to strict on images now. I'm starting to believe them. Devilmanozzy (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Dragon Age

Why did you move "List of characters in to Dragon Age universe" to Characters of Dragon Age? I based the page name on [[List of characters in the Mass Effect universe. More importantly, why on earth did you then list it as Start class rather than list class? --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 23:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Phil The Atelist

Thanks for the deletion, but in retrospect it would probably be more sensible to restore it and move it over to User talk:Phil The Atelist - you'd have to delete the latter page as I did a copy / paste move, but at least it would keep contributions intact. Would you mind? Phil The Atelist (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Etienne lorrain

Just a small question, if you do not mind: I had listed few "references" in the "discussion" page associated with the "gujin" page, but I think never got any comment back; would any of them make valid "source"?

Etienne lorrain (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Node.js

Why did you delete that page? I wanted to read it. If you really want to save some bytes that badly, clear your user page next time. No one cares about that stuff.

There are 75 people in the node.js IRC channel. Yea, looks notable enough to me. 78.52.75.122 (talk) 03:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

IntelliGym Image

Hi MrKIA11. As promised I'm trying to improve my take on the IntelliGym article. I saw that you requested for image and I tried creating and uploading one (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Basketball_IntelliGym_Screenshot.png). For some reason, i can't make it to be seen in the article. Could not find a remedy in any WP manual. Could you pls help? Thanks DrJHoward (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Pinball WP

Did you have a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Pinball cleanup ? User:SMcCandlish is basically accusing us of making a mess of pinball-related articles. Good to see you're back, btw. JACOPLANE • 2010-01-18 15:44

Thanks for fixing template troubles

Thanks. I'm not sure what I did wrong, but it looks like I was looking at the wrong page when trying to fix it. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Warfare

The game is now defunct as you can probably tell by the estimated June 2, 2009 release date. I'll place an AFD on the page. Jacob S. grafitti 21:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Curious

How do you delsort to the video games queue since it's not hosted under WP:DELSORT, and does not appear in Vandenberg's tool? Pcap ping 21:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Hiroshi Watanabe (musician)

Hiroshi Watanabe works (or has worked) with Konami on their Bemani games, that is why his article is listed as part of the WikiProject Video game. If you do not object, I'll re-add the template.  æronphonehome  19:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks

Heya and thanks for cleaning + adding the vg/ps2 categories to the Aliens vs Predator: Extinction article. have one question touch, is the creator of an article supposed to add categories to an article or was it okay to wait? and another thing i am a bit ashamed of, i...didnt understand the citing of references as you can see in the reception section..can you help me with that one time please? is the article all in all okay so? i want to add some informations here and there about the gameplay and a bitmore details in the reception section. is a screenshot needed? greets, gbk oh, one more thing..how do you get that "This user is a member of WikiProject Video games." icon for the userpage? GBK2010 (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Technical question

I like your work on the VG deletion page, and as you seem technically proficient, here's a question. Do you think it would be possible to add the VG-source custom sources Google search engine to the deletion pages of VG articles? I mean, just like there are currently some source-searching links there already. You can find the thing I mean in the introductory paragraph of the list at WP:VG/S#List.

For example, if you use an automated tool to add deletion pages to the VG category, could that tool modify the sources template on top of deletion debates? Or maybe just add a link to the "Note: this has been added to VG deletions" thing.

User:Krator (t c) 14:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Box shots

Hello, can you please add shots to Emerald Mine and Chimera (computer game) (if they can be found)? Koren (talk) 15:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Dariusburst move

sure! if you would examine the front of the official soundtrack album, please: http://vgmdb.net/album/16136

and in most Japanese sources (namely, Taito themselves), the title is always written "DARIUSBURST", like the game's logo. Elm-39 - T/C/N 15:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

I think it does, simply because so many Japanese sources write it as "DARIUSBURST" anyway. the soundtrack album simply clarifies this. a lot of those western sources are incorrect; someone wasn't paying attention, and then eventually no one else knows better. imo it's especially wrong when even the so called "fans" don't know better. Elm-39 - T/C/N 15:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Categorising images

  • (Deletion log); 07:21 . . MrKIA11 (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Qantas check in at Adelaide Airport .jpg" (F2: Corrupt or empty image, or image page for an image on Commons)
  • (Deletion log); 07:20 . . MrKIA11 (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Australien Adelaide Park Torrens.jpg" (F2: Corrupt or empty image, or image page for an image on Commons)
<Unnecessary volume-of-examples removed. Pdfpdf (talk) 06:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)>
  • (Deletion log); 06:08 . . MrKIA11 (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Television license area - Adelaide.svg" (F2: Corrupt or empty image, or image page for an image on Commons)
  • (Deletion log); 06:05 . . MrKIA11 (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:AdelaideSkylineAdelaideOvalCloseUp.jpg" (F2: Corrupt or empty image, or image page for an image on Commons)

Hmmm. There's a lot of them, isn't there? And they're only the ones on my watchlist. No doubt there are many others, too.
Tell me please - did you give ANY thought as to why there might be so many of them at ANY stage before, during or after your mass deletion exercise?
(When I have your answer, I will ask some more questions.)
Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

I get the feeling that your comment is not assuming good faith. As my edit summaries say, I'm deleting the pages on the basis of F2, which includes image page for an image on Commons, which all of these are. Images are Commons are not supposed to be categorized on here. If you still have any questions, let me know. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
You're being a little touchy, aren't you? I asked you a fairly simple and straight-forward question, viz: "did you give ANY thought as to why there might be so many of them at ANY stage before, during or after your mass deletion exercise?" Your response COMPLETELY avoids providing ANY information relevant to the question I asked. Instead, you have gone on the attack. And, without AGF yourself, have questioned whether I'm AGF!
How about AGF, read what I wrote, and answer the question I asked you? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
OK, obviously we are misinterpreting each other. I took the italics and bold font as being a little over the top. Could you please reword your question, because I thought I answered it. I obviously misunderstood it. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry that we're not communicating effectively. I'm not trying to pick a fight. At this point of the conversation, I'm just trying to get more information.
My intention was, "When I have that information, then I'll know what question it is I want to ask you."
I could continue on that track and "play that game" with you, but although your responses have not yet provided me with the information I'm seeking, they have provided me with (other) information that is relevant.
I suggest that the most efficient path is for me to start again, using the new information that I now have. Accordingly, assuming that is OK with you (Yes, I know, BIG assumption), here goes: (I suppose I'd better sign this bit first: Pdfpdf (talk) 14:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC) )
You have deleted a large number of pages on :en:WP. (As it happens, those pages were associated with images.)
Those pages existed for a reason. They contained more information than just the image. (i.e. they contained "metadata" about the image. Metadata on :en:WP that was "useful".)
You have stated: "Images are Commons are not supposed to be categorized on here."
I'm afraid that I'm not confident I understand what you mean.
My understanding of the situation is that those "file:"s were uploaded on :en:WP and categorised on :en:WP, and then subsequently moved to commons.
Fine. No problem with that.
But then, what happens to the meta-data? (i.e. the categorisation on :en:WP?) That's still useful data.
Why does moving the images to commons suddenly invalidate that (very) useful categorisation data on :en:WP?
Is that clearer?
Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately I do not have a good reason for that. I am just following the guidelines. This might be a good issue to bring up somewhere with a larger audience, possible the village pump. I think the current thinking is that categories are meant to group only pages on this wiki, and not cross-wiki. But as far as I can tell (based on a few images that I checked), the pages were categorized after the image was moved to Commons and page was deleted. So by adding the category, the page was created for an image that was not really there, but actually on Commons. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Again, I re-iterate that I'm not trying to pick a fight, but I'm still having a bit of trouble following you. You've raised several points. I'll try to address all of them, but obviously I'm more interested in some than others. However, I've just been reminded that at 0200, I really should be doing other things. (e.g. sleeping) So I'll continue this "later". Pdfpdf (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
On rereading and on reflection, I see that my negative reaction is to the guideline. Criticising you for following the guideline is analogous to "shooting the messenger". So, my apologies for "shooting at the messenger".
(However, using the "war crimes defence", (i.e. "I was just following orders"), is probably not the best modus operandi to employ when embarking on large-scale editing exercises ...)
Yes, the village pump is probably the best place to raise the issue. Thanks for that. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Innocent Heart

I see that you have re-deleted Innocent Heart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Could you tell me who created it this time? It's probably a sock of Xtinadbest, and I need the evidence for a SPI. WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Xtinadbest/Archive, if you are interested in details.—Kww(talk) 14:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Mary Fahl albums

Hi MrKIA11, I would like to reinstate this category. I requested deletion of it in accordance with WP:G7 several days ago, but this was an accident, as I meant to request deletion of Category:Mary Fahl. I have requested speedy deletion for the latter just a few moments ago. My apologies for not paying closer attention! – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 04:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Central High School

Hey! I just thought I'd let you know that Central High School is actually located in Fort Worth, Texas, not Keller, and so I'm changing the title back to Central High School (Fort Worth, Texas). It's very confusing, I know. I myself thought CHS and the surrounding area was located in Keller for a long time. However, even though the school is in Keller ISD and has a Keller mailing address, it is in Fort Worth city limits. http://www.dfwmaps.com/index.asp?extentleft=2344743.65299554&extentright=2348004.34700446&extenttop=7017394.78457759&extentbottom=7014451.21542241&Layers=on&SHADECITY=on&AERIAL07=&AERIAL05=&Requests=on&selectpt.x=2346374&selectpt.y=7015923&selectpt.stat=none&idCmd=&identify=&mo=1&buffer=0.5&msize=small&AF=&mapTheme=dfwmaps&mapOption=Regional_Features&ortho03=&contour01=&Zoomby=7

Long URL, huh? This has the city boundaries of all municipalities in the North Central Texas Council of Governments, which includes the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. CHS's address is pinpointed. The green area to the east is Keller, and the blue area to the west is Fort Worth. So, although CHS lies very close to Keller city limits, it is actually in Fort Worth, as indicated by the map. Thanks!--Stallions2010 (talk) 23:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Stallions2010, you can actually put the URL in single brackets "[ ]" and this way the URL will appear only as a few characters in length. For example: [1]Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 00:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy moves

Thank you MrKIA11, for all the speedy help with the speedy moves. I have the same request with three more similar titles, which would probably be a lot less confusing for you to deal with directly. Please see - Death And All His Friends, Yes(Song), and Chinese sleep chant. Thanks again! -- WikHead (talk) 14:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

To be honest, I'm not sure where Yes(Song) should go. I do realise however, that Yes (song) is a dab page, and Yes (Song) redirects to Yes(Song). Trying to sort it all out has really confused me ;). I have no personal attachments to these articles, they are only naming errors I stubled upon while disambiguating links. I guess Yes (Coldplay song) would work though. -- WikHead (talk) 14:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Noriyoshi Oba-san's page

Hi,

I tried to upload a page about Ohba-san before I realized that you actually made an article about him located

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noriyoshi_Ohba

I actually work with Ohba-san at Premium Agency, Inc., he is sitting to my right side as I type this ;-)

The reason I couldn't find your article was

1. Ohba-san spells his last name in latin letters with an h 2. You can only find hin if you are searching him by his full name, typing "Noriyoshi" first, which is kinda arkward, especially for Japanese.

Still sorry for making a double entry

I would propose a merger. The problem with citation is kinda difficult, Ohba-san san said "if you take this info from my CV it MUST be valid!", can you think of a good way to veryfy the information? We will soon have a press release at our company Website annoucning that Ohba-san now works for us, but in a scientific way of thought a corporate site is kind of a bad source...

thanks for your support, I hope to hear from you soon.Lordcraymen (talk) 08:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Libertarianism disambiguation without fair warning

Why wasn't there mention of your proposing deleting this on the talk page? I last signed in 20 odd hours ago and didn't see it. Since I haven't looked at the disambiguation page lately, I can't remember what was on it. Giving people warning is useful cause now I have to figure out where to go to complain it was deleted without warning. CarolMooreDC (talk) 17:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

you wrote, moved from my talk page:
It actually fell under the umbrella of speedy deletion criteria G6. {{Db-disambig}} explains it better. There was no need for the page. You could go to WP:DRV, but there is no need. What are your concerns? If you have a reason for the page to exist, I can restore it, otherwise, I doubt the deletion will be overturned. Let me know what you think. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 17:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
There used to be 3 or 4 links which had been argued over a lot in the past, but Libertarianism (metaphysics) and Libertarian socialism were two that were not controversial. (Anarchism kept being put in and taken out.) Were either or both there when you looked? I later noticed that just before you did it someone removed the disambiguation page from Libertarianism article. Did someone recently remove Libertarian socialism also? It seems to me three links are sufficient for a page. CarolMooreDC (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
When I deleted the page, the only links left were Libertarianism, and Libertarianism (metaphysics). MrKIA11 (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
So do you think that it should be put back up, given that evidently someone (perhaps maliciously) deleted Libertarian socialism? CarolMooreDC (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
I do not mind restoring the article, but I would prefer if you first came to a consensus with MutantPlatypus, who was the one that removed Civil libertarianism and Anarchism, and marked the page for deletion. (their edit summary: Civil Libertarianism is described within the libertarianism article. Should references to social libertarianism, anarchist libertarianism, etc. be included here too? No). That was the only edit since you last edited the page. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
I do not want to put those two back and I think Libertarian socialism is pretty clear and it should have been there. But I did mention it on his talk page and encouraged him to reply here. CarolMooreDC (talk) 16:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Phew! I was afraid I had deleted libertarian socialism. We apparently agree on the other links, so why don't we move the discussion of libertarian socialism to the disambiguation talk page? MutantPlatypus (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Oh wait, it's still not there. I guess I'll discuss here, then. My concerns were only over the anarchism and civil libertarianism links. I won't object to restoring the disambiguation page so we can discuss libertarian socialism on there, but I don't think such a link belongs on there, anyway. Should we then include everything that claims the slightest connection to libertarianism? Libertarian socialism is one of the many variants of libertarianism, along with libertarian communism, libertarian capitalism, libertarian transhumanism, etc. These are better suited to (and included in) the libertarianism sidebar. Furthermore, there isn't much literature that uses "libertarianism" alone to refer to "libertarian socialism". MutantPlatypus (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
First, libertarian communism and libertarian capitalism are not the names of articles but re-directs. I personally don't have any investment in, as you reminded me, any of the 3 or 4 articles which are called Libertarian _______. In fact I have edited out junk in most of them. I just think the purpose of an encyclopedia is to inform and educate. Some people who only know about libertarianism through transhumanism, for example, might be additionally educated by typing in libertarian and seeing various alternatives. And there will be MUCH less problems with leftists who have been very active on that article in the past having fits about the article if they can see Libertarian socialism prominently as a disambiguation. However, as I've said before, the left libertarians doubtless WILL be back in force at some point in Libertarianism article and I don't see any reason to aggravate them, either in the article or in the disambiguation, as long as they have WP:RS.
In short, one new editor should not be able to overturn the whole history of the article, including having a disambiguation page deleted. CarolMooreDC (talk) 01:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
"Some people who only know about libertarianism through transhumanism, for example, might be additionally educated by typing in libertarian and seeing various alternatives."
There's also a libertarianism sidebar in every article, which serves the same purpose much more effectively, IMO. There are links to every kind of libertarianism imaginable, and its bright and blue and in your face. Someone who only knows libertarianism through transhumanism should start at the
"There will be MUCH less problems with leftists who have been very active on that article in the past having fits about the article if they can see Libertarian socialism prominently as a disambiguation."
So we just give in to them? If it becomes a problem, we can ask that it be locked against anonymous IP edits, and just keep an eye on it to report the changes that registered users make. My hope is to get administrators to join the discussion page and eventually resolve the conflict if it gets out of hand. Then, we can figure that discussion prominently on the talk page and get an edit notice on the article's editing page.
I think we're in the right here when it comes to having libertarian socialism figure less prominently. See this policy page. The socialists used it first, but I could find myriad, secondary, reliable sources referring to libertarianism (with a small-l) as the propertarian variety in modern day usage. Libertarian socialism deserves mention, but if Libertarianism is going to be more than a really big disambiguation page, then the propertarian view should figure most prominently.
I even found a poll: [2]
What do you think? I'd especially like to know what MrKIA11 thinks... MutantPlatypus (talk) 09:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I really have no input to provide. But it seems that you two agree that I should restore the page for possibly Libertarianism, Libertarian transhumanism, and Libertarian socialism, and to continue the discussion on that talk page? MrKIA11 (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I have no objections to restoring the page. MutantPlatypus (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I restored the page, so further discussion of what links are on it can continue there. Some of this discussion might be good to copy there. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

HEY WHY DON'T YOU CONTACT ME FIRST?

Why was the image deleted? I have proper permissions. Timneu22 (talk) 02:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:AN/TPS-43 deletion

Hi. I think the deletion of the Talk page is unwarranted. It includes some minor info on what's going on. The article is under vandalism attack from some anonymous sockpuppet in Colombia. I and other admins have the page watchlisted and I am blocking any new vandal from the range of IPs as sockpuppets for a month, as they appear. I think you should consider restoring the page (minus whatever vandalism may appear) and would be nice if you could also watch it as it is a vandal target for some obscure reason. -- Alexf(talk) 04:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

RE:Characters of Kingdom Hearts's FAR

I couldn't find a policy page on this, but I remember reading the answer for this at WT:FAC a while ago. When the article earned its FA star, it had to give up its GA status. Since it lost both, it's eligible only for one of the standard letter ranks assigned by a WikiProject. Obtaining either GA or FA again would require another review. (Guyinblack25 talk 15:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC))

I see your point. Technically, it is no longer GA. I didn't find any policy to clarify what should be done, so I'd say it's up to editors to interpret and apply Wikipedia definitions.
In my mind, "no longer GA" ≠ "demoted FA". I think the case where an article would qualify to be designated as both is when it obtained FA, then was demoted, then obtained GA, and was later demoted from that too. The few that meet that are Talk:All your base are belong to us and Talk:Wario. The KH characters article, however, is like Talk:Supreme Commander (video game). It went to GA first, then to FA, and was later demoted from FA.
If you disagree, that's perfectly fine. This is a rather minor point that I won't push. Whatever you decide, just make sure KH characters and Supreme Commander are listed the same way. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC))

Pinoy Big Brother Floor Plan Deletion

Good day. You deleted an image which was created by me. The website cited for saying that the photo is not mine is actually NOT an official website of the said show (Pinoy Big Brother), nor of the said network (ABS-CBN). Notice that the caption used by the website is exactly the same as that used in this article. Furthermore, the show itself, in its official website, has a virtual tour, and not a 2D floor plan. I made this floor plan in PAINT and used screen captures from those with 24/7, so I can have an accurate floor plan. Please be mindful of this, as I spent time in doing this floor plan. I hope you can revoke the deletion. Thank you. LordBelly06 (talk) 01:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I am saying that the photo is indeed mine. I made that image for one whole week using PAINT. As mentioned, I used screenshots of fellow forumers who post it online to make a somehow accurate floorplan. You can check the main site and all they have is a virtual tour. Please restore it. I gave it my time and effort, and I want to share it to the community. LordBelly06 (talk) 10:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

X-ray lithography

it seemed talk page was merged with the article there. Materialscientist (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I have to run and can't look into details. I meant this edit which moved Talk page into the main article. Materialscientist (talk) 02:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Am I mistaken or have the shinnagans with X-ray lithography caused the history of the article to be replaced by the history of Talk:X-ray lithography? Astronaut (talk) 03:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I removed that history merge (talk page + main article). Forgive me if I misunderstood something in the previous moves. Otherwise, happy editing. Materialscientist (talk) 03:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
On partial history moves: the only way I know is what has been done there: delete again and remove selected edits (hoping that internet connection doesn't break during that :-) and that the article has <5k edits). Materialscientist (talk) 22:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! (Honing steel)

A lil’ thanks for deleting/moving Honing steel, and helping make WP run smoothly and swiftly!

—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 21:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Maizex Inc Page Deletion

I have re-written the article and included several references. Is it ok if I repost it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdonkey (talkcontribs) 14:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

I have posted this in my userspace. User:Cdonkey/Maizex. Do I have enough references for this article? Thanks so much! - Cdonkey (talk) 17:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey there

I guess it was just a matter of time. Looks like everyone eventually moves on from Wikipedia.

Just wanted to thank you for all the time and effort you put into the VG project. It ran smoothly largely because of your edits.

Hope to see you on the wiki in the future. If not, I certainly understand. (Guyinblack25 talk 16:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC))

As you also well know, real life can be time consuming :-) I'm slammed with work right now, but I'm hoping to get back in September. I have 23 pages saved of new articles that haven't been posted. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Glad to hear you plan to come back. :-D See you in September. (Guyinblack25 talk 19:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC))

Great Wine Capitals Deletion

You deleted the Great Wine Capitals Global Network page last december (the english version). But I don't really understand why. It is not a text about the promotion of the Network, but a page of information I created. There is still the page in french and in italian. What can I do if I want to restore the page? I can see it has already been restored once so...Can you give me more information about that?Thank you. Gwcstcs (talk) 07:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

MfD date headers

Hi,
not sure if you're gonna read this in time, but if you do, could you comment at WT:Miscellany for deletion#Date header, and old thread of yours?
Cheers, Amalthea 18:40, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II on the PC

The reliable source is here. And on Wookieepedia they tell that the PC version will be developed by Aspyr. 84.86.199.99 (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello there!

Excuse me, can I ask you a favor please?
Could you help me find (or show me the way to) a game reviewer to review my contributed pages, which are listed below, please?
Dream Chronicles (series)
Dream Chronicles
Dream Chronicles 2: The Eternal Maze
Dream Chronicles: The Chosen Child
Dream Chronicles: The Book of Air
Thanks first for your kindness! :D --†hinhin_of_you / buzzworthy / βoy Ünder Ғlowers / Mons†er Ғierce 02:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned images

I've orphaned several game cover images of yours, removing them from Hugo (series), as this usage is basically a game-ography, per WP:NFC. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)