User talk:Mstatt

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mstatt, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Terror threat analytics, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Quasar G. 22:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Terror threat analytics[edit]

The article Terror threat analytics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A neologism which has not become famous (there are only two results for the phrase on Google).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Quasar G. 22:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Terror threat analytics[edit]

The article Terror threat analytics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Appears to be largely original research and promotional. See also neologisms.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terror threat analytics for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terror threat analytics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terror threat analytics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

reply to|Robert McClenon This is an ongoing body of work and I have linked a Harpers article to the base of using a complex adaptive systems model to try and predict wars. I will be adding citations properly as I continue cleaning up and adjusting the grammar. This is a combination of technology and other fields to combat a very real problem.

Proposed deletion of Michael J. Stattelman[edit]

The article Michael J. Stattelman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael J. Stattelman for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael J. Stattelman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Stattelman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Michael J. Stattelman article[edit]

Hello Mstatt. Before I put my comment on the proposal to delete the article Michael J. Stattelman, I thought I would drop you a note so that you can remedy the shortcomings I was going to highlight.

The first problem I see is with regard to Wikipedia:Verifiability. The criterion for including material in Wikipedia is not simply whether it is true; it must also be verifiable. I quote: "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." There are too many assertions about Mr. Stattelman in this article that are not supported by any cited source.

Verifiable content from independent reliable sources is also the key to what Wikipedia calls notability (see Wikipedia:Notability), which is my second point. For inclusion in Wikipedia, a subject must be notable in the Wikipedia sense of the word. There are lots of special criteria for different types of article, but underlying them all is the general notability guideline, which states: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." (quoted from WP:GNG).

I find that the best way to avoid deletion of an article is to ensure that it cites high quality independent sources for every factual aspect of the article, and that as many of these sources as possible give the subject "significant coverage" as explained at WP:GNG. Ultimately these are the criteria upon which the decision to keep or delete an article will be based.

I hope this may help. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, and do contact me if you need any help with this. Best regards — Hebrides (talk) 16:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Mstatt. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content weapons moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Content weapons, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]