User talk:Natural RX

Archives

/Archive 1: October '08 - December '13
/Archive 2: January '14 - December '16

Leave a message. If you start a discussion here, please post all replies on here.

Your GA nomination of 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire

The article 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2016 Fort McMurray wildfire for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Acefitt -- Acefitt (talk) 02:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of GO Transit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article GO Transit you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrWooHoo -- MrWooHoo (talk) 14:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article GO Transit you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold

. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:GO Transit for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrWooHoo -- MrWooHoo (talk) 03:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article GO Transit you nominated as a good article has passed

; see Talk:GO Transit for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrWooHoo -- MrWooHoo (talk) 03:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Ontario generating station lists

Hi there! I was doing some work on articles relating to OPG and saw that there are two duplicate article listing generating stations in Ontario. Are you still willing to delete List of power generating stations in Ontario to deal with the duplication? It seems there wasn't a lot of discussion for a merger but if you G7 your page you can still add some of the content from it to the other page. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 01:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@RA0808: Hey. Willing to G7 my page, but the only thing that needs integrating is the defunct power stations on my page. Wesleyville Generating Station information in particular, I believe it got placed there because some other stub got deleted, and may have been the impetus for my list in the first place. Can you integrate it somehow? --Natural R_X 15:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Abiogenesis

On 2 March 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Abiogenesis, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited GO Transit bus services, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Talleyrand Terminal Railroad logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Talleyrand Terminal Railroad logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent Yard/Keele Yard

My apologies, I wasn't aware of the official switch by the TTC. I'll go ahead and take care of that for you now. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UrbanToronto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UrbanToronto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UrbanToronto until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TTR

You created the Union Station Rail Corridor article and removed the anchor for Toronto Terminals Railway from the Union Station article. Please be more careful about the impact you edits may have. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CG Railway infobox

Template:CG Railway infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 10:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

York Region rail-interchange icons

I have a few concerns with the Viva rint icons you recently added. Firstly, the generic Viva icon () and the Viva Blue icon () are exactly the same making it visually ambiguous without clicking.

Additionally, the icons are still too wide to fit nicely in a Routemap such as Viva Pink, which requires 2 of them side by side (). Perhaps a single stylized, coloured V (something like V or V ) would be more useful? BLAixx 04:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's visually ambiguous between the general viva and viva blue. I also agree just a stylized 'v' would work better. So how about a) a general link to viva rapid transit is left as the full 'viva' logo, and reference to viva blue is just the stylized 'v'? --Natural R_X 13:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is great, exactly what I had in mind! -BLAixx 19:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award

		The Red Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Natural RX for writing the new article Union Station Rail Corridor during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 15:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Natural RX. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

--'''[[User:Natural RX|<font color="#000000">Natural</font>]] [[User talk:Natural RX|<font color="#228b22">R</font><sub><font color="#000000">X</font></sub>]]'''

: --Natural R_X

to

--'''[[User:Natural RX|<span style="color: #000000">Natural</span>]] [[User talk:Natural RX|<span style="color: #228b22">R</span><sub style="color: #000000">X</sub>]]'''

: --Natural R_X

—Anomalocaris (talk) 23:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, it's been changed. --Natural R_X 02:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is this you?

I notice that not only do you share the name with this entity, but you even use their logo colors in your signature. By chance are you affilated? Un school 04:50, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

lmao no sir. Clearly they ripped my handle. My thinking behind it was a bit more philosophical and beyond pot too. --Natural R_X 14:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if it makes you feel any better, they're one of the more reputable outlets of that type around. Un school 04:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of power generating stations in Ontario

I merged the article into List of generating stations in Ontario Harizotoh9 (talk) 02:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire (2)

The article 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2016 Fort McMurray wildfire for things which need to be addressed. Ribbet32 (talk) 04:47, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry I've been away, work has kept me busy and exhausted. I'll still be taking a look at this. Ribbet32 (talk) 13:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, no problem! --Natural R_X 13:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you saw but I've completed the criteria 2 review Ribbet32 (talk) 02:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire (3)

Hate to WP:KETTLE given my previous long absence from the review, but it's been one month since your last edits and two weeks since my last comment, and you've been editing other articles during this time. Are you planning to come back to this? Ribbet32 (talk) 22:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire

The article 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2016 Fort McMurray wildfire for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bot appears to have had a brain malfunction. It was a pass. Ribbet32 (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for all your support Ribbet32. Looks like the notification error is an ongoing issue. Cheers. --Natural R_X 15:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Natural RX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ISG colour (again)

Hey, posted some newer thoughts on the Independent Senators Group colour here a few minutes ago and was interested in your feedback. The Tom (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Submissions for The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third anniversary. You are receiving this message because you participated in previous years of the challenge but have not yet submitted any article improvements for this year. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved, ensuring that all submissions are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors in November.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or go the challenge page at WP:CAN10K for more information. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Reidgreg (talk) and WP:CAN10K, 21:03, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CG Railway/inline

Template:CG Railway/inline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 01:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go Transit

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Canadian stations)#Go station naming regarding station naming conventions for Go Transit. Cards84664 00:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Providence and Worcester Railroad logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Providence and Worcester Railroad logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:T-Line (Hamilton)

Template:T-Line (Hamilton) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:GO Transit Peterborough

Template:GO Transit Peterborough has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:St-Laurent et Atlantique Railroad logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:St-Laurent et Atlantique Railroad logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Massena Terminal Railroad logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Massena Terminal Railroad logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

G&W logos

Hi Natural RX. I just wanted to let you know you may be seeing more of the bot messages about non-free use rationales for G&W logos (one for the Connecticut Southern Railroad logo you uploaded should show up shortly). A few years ago, G&W was kind enough to replace all their logos on websites with SVG versions, which are much higher quality. As I or other editors come across png versions, they will get replaced. If it interests you, you could certainly speed up the process yourself. I know you're not very active, so I wanted to make sure you knew there's no urgent need to respond to most of these messages. Thanks! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Trainsandotherthings: Wish I had time for such things. I would caution about the resolution you're uploading them at. I see File:Connecticut_Southern_Railroad_logo.svg was already bot tagged for a reduction. A large logo is not necessary for the articles and runs afoul of WP:NFCC, the PNGs I originally uploaded were sized down to comply with that. I'd recommend exporting any remaining ones at a more appropriate size (117 × 86 was the original size for the PNGs, I'm sure you could find a nicer number no more than 100px height). --Natural R_X 05:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why it's taking so long to do the reduction; normally the bot runs pretty fast and takes care of it, as it did for File:Massena Terminal Railroad Logo.svg. I take the SVGs from the G&W website, and for some reason, when I save them they're quite large even though they appear rather small on the website. My concern with the PNGs is that while the are appropriately sized, they're not as good quality. I will see what I can do to ensure they aren't getting uploaded so large going forward, thanks for letting me know. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Connecticut Southern Railroad logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connecticut Southern Railroad logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Finch Central LRT

Template:Finch Central LRT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CAN-AFG detainee issue

Template:CAN-AFG detainee issue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Line 2 SSE

Template:Line 2 SSE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]