User talk:Nofil Jawed

Welcome!

Hello, Nofil Jawed! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Nofil Jawed, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nofil Jawed! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Biman Bangladesh Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pakistan International Airlines, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful editing if you have a connection to a subject

Hello, Nofil Jawed. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pakistan International Airlines, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Shaheen Air. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 01:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And maybe you should also read WP:CIVIL regarding your edit summary in this [1] edit.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 01:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, forums are not reliable sources per WP:SPS [2].--Jetstreamer ^Talk 01:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using forums as sources [3]. They are not considered reliable.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 02:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Nofil Jawed. Thank you.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 03:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Your recent editing history at Shaheen Air shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for adding irrelevant information and sometimes Wrong Information too

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan_International_Airlines. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 09:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Hi there Nofel Jawed! You have been editing on various Aviation related pages recently. Giving information on Wikipedia is a good as Wikipedia is made for this but adding irrelevant info isn't required. Previously you've been given warning from other bots on Wikipedia and now again you're given warning for adding irrelevant and sometimes wrong info on aviation related pages especially at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_International_Airlines 's fleet section. I hope you understand this and the rules and regulations of editing in Wikipedia. As said earlier, no need add IRRELEVANT information even if your father works in the airline. Many of your editing were false editing.[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 09:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. MilborneOne (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shaheen Air

Please explain why edits that:

fixed bad spelling
fixed bad grammar
removed unsourced speculation about the future in accordance with WP:CRYSTAL
removed advertising in accordance with Wikipedia Policy
removed background colours from a table in accordance with Wikipedia Policy
added a better-quality image
added better Wikilinks

are bad edits that must be undone. Respond here, I will be keeping watch on your Talk page. YSSYguy (talk) 19:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond; why do you continually undo proper changes? What makes you think that bad spelling and bad grammar "looks better"? YSSYguy (talk) 22:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked from editing all Wikipedia pages with the exception of this one. Not responding is but another indication that your only intention is to push your preferred version of articles and to war.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for continuing to edit war. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. MilborneOne (talk) 18:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nofil Jawed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked by MilborneOne for "apparently" adding too much information on Shaheen Air's Wikipedia pages fleet section. He stated "No need to make it long and confusing" Firstly, it was not long. Secondly, It was not confusing. I put notes on every Aircraft section to what I had seen. If you look at any other Airline's page on Wikipedia, they have some interesting facts (notes) on their fleet section. They have notes on every aircraft. For an example, Shaheen Air currently has 2 Airbus A330-200's on order. For notes, it would be a good idea for me to put when the aircraft's are going to arrive, rather than just telling them that they're coming and they're on order. People need information. I'm sure you understand. If there is any issue, please leave a message on my talk page.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Unblock expired. Mike V • Talk 22:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked for warring.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Block Request

Hello Nofil Jawed. Regarding the full protection of the article, I think you should take a look at MilborneOne(talk · contribs)'s disruptive behaviour across it, along with the one at Shaheen Air (where the user is well over WP:3RR even after having been warned of this.) He continuously tries to start an editing war. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nofil Jawed (talk • contribs) 00:05, 27 April 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you're referring to the right editor? MilborneOne has not been involved in editing the content of Shaheen Air, although they have protected the article at least twice to stop edit wars. —C.Fred (talk) 01:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YSSYguy was also involed.

Frankly, you should only be worrying about your own conduct. Admins can take care of any other editors who might need sanctions. —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred and MilborneOne: This [4] shows that Nofil Jawed's only intention is to continue warring.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nofil Jawed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nofil Jawed. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]