User talk:Rajputudor

Welcome

Hello, Rajputudor, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Rajputudor, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inez de Venegas moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Inez de Venegas, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added sources to my article Rajputudor (talk) 14:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inez de Venegas (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inez de Venegas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inez de Venegas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rajputudor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Catherine of Aragon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr.Charmer thank you I did not know you had to cite ,I will cite my sources and add the pictures back Sorry for any inconvenience Rajputudor (talk) 17:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Margherita d'Este moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Margherita d'Este, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:50, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anne de Beaujeu?

Was she married to John VIII, Count of Vendome?? --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no she wasn't his wife's father was

AH. Ok. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like some assistance with Isabelle de Beauvau? --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Udai Singh II, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC) Hey alivardi I added a link to references and added back the information thanks for letting me know about the reference problem sincerely Rajputudor[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Udai Singh II, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

We can not use Wikipedia articles as references for other Wikipedia articles. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC) oh ok thank you[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inez de Venegas (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

Where does all of this information come from? Especially the "it is possible" parts? Is that something written in a scholarly book, or something that you concluded? Please add references as appropriate. Note that http://www.tudorwomen.com/ is not a reliable source and cannot be the basis for a Wikipedia article. Also, you cannot insert your own opinions -- things like "if she were alive around that time I doubt she would respect Queen Anne as she hated Spain and sided with the french. " and "beloved" are not appropriate for an encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inez de Venegas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inez de Venegas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marie de Bourbon (1428–1448) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marie de Bourbon (1428–1448) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie de Bourbon (1428–1448) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 09:57, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inez de Venegas

Hello, Rajputudor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inez de Venegas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Margherita d'Este

Hello, Rajputudor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Margherita d'Este, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Margherita d'Este

Hello, Rajputudor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Margherita d'Este".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inez de Venegas

Hello, Rajputudor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inez de Venegas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]