User talk:RajveerSingha1950

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RajveerSingha1950!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anniyan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Khaleja, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am RajveerSingha1950.

Dear, you have made a mistake so, please edit this. RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 14:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @RajveerSingha1950. Do you have a reliable source you can cite which verifies the Hindi-dubbed version of Khaleja? — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RajveerSingha1950. I see that you have restored the claim about a Hindi-dubbed version. Remember Wikipedia's content policy for Verifiability: All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. There is a list of generally reliable sources at WP:ICTFSOURCES. Perhaps one of those has an article that you can use to verify the claim. I will remove the claim again. If you restore it without citing a published reliable source to verify, then, unfortunately, I will refer the situation to an administrator's noticeboard for appropriate action. — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Archer1234

Thanks. RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm JML1148. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Khaleja, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 11:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shilpa Shirodkar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User talk:Geniac, I had edited it after I saw Shilpa Shirodkar's profile on Google. The D.O.B. was written 20/11/1969(20 November 1969). You had made a mistake, but still there is a lot of time to revert it. This is not a warning at all, I'm just telling you to revert it. Hope you don't mind. RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 10:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will not revert my edit. Google is a search engine, not a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Geniac (talk) 21:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Geniac (talk)

It is also a reliable source. I am not even forcing you that Google proves that the year 1969 isn't false. Tell me, what is the proof that whatever you're saying is true? RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't know what you're trying to say. But I see now that one source says 1969 and one says 1973, so I've made an edit as per WP:DOB, which says "include all birth dates/years for which a reliable source exists, clearly noting discrepancies". Geniac (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Geniac (talk) Okay, I'll view that article. RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 12:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Geniac, it's okay that you added slashes (/) in the article like (20 November 1969/20 November 1973). You even used "or" here, like (20 November 1969 'or' 20 November 1973). Kudos to you! RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maati-O-Manush (2009 film) (May 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Note IMDB is not a reliable source see WP:IMDB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maati-O-Manush (2009 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RajveerSingha1950! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maati-O-Manush (2009 film) (May 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maati-O-Manush (2009 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maati-O-Manush (2009 film) (May 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maati-O-Manush (2009 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please listen, KylieTastic

I wanted to create an article about an underrated film which is lesser known. I couldn't do it easily so I took the help of draft and created it, I don't know what are the external references about the film, including its theatrical release. I had got to know that it was released in 2009. I had added the details I know and other details which I took from the internet, please don't reject the article. If I don't or "I can't" edit it again, you could definitely create an article about this film. I want this film's recognition even in the worldwide. It didn't even get a single rating after all. I am not a chairman of the film's production house, this film can touch your heart too Miss Kylie. It is free on YouTube as written in the drafted article. You can ask Wikipedia too, but don't reject it. It's a request. RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You too are an expert editor, right? RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 09:54, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RajveerSingha1950 all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). In the case of files also see Wikipedia:Notability (films) for other specific criteria. The only source you have is not even a valid link. Note that sources do not have to be in English. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 12:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
MissKylie, will my drafted article be approved? RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 13:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, not without multiple independent reliable sources to show notability or sources that show how it passes the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (films). I have linked two WikiProjects on Draft talk:Maati-O-Manush (2009 film) that are related in case someone is interested. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Veera (2011 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pradeep Rawat. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's all right, Mr. JaGa and DPL the bot. RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 10:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Vedam (film), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sabina Mausam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabina Mausam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabina Mausam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 20:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be made. I didn't have any choice, so I did this. Dear Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 21:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RajveerSingha1950 What is about the choice? Are you connected to the subject? If you’re connected then pls disclose it. Thanks Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then please make this page on Wikipedia as well. Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 07:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sabina Mausam. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome! Wikishovel (talk) RajveerSingha1950 (talk) 12:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sabina Mausam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandhya.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maati-O-Manush (2009 film)[edit]

Hello, RajveerSingha1950. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maati-O-Manush (2009 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maati-O-Manush (2009 film) (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvement.

Qcne (talk) 13:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]