User talk:Renamed user kejfwe92u9kfo34440fk

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Iranian Queer Organization. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Gobonobo ^T ^C 10:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: June 2010

dear Gobonobo sorry, i just didn't know that i myself have to put the Articles for deletion notices code in the article. i added this code to the correct information on IRQO and edit it again.

Sincerely, Raham

Hi Raham. Could you please engage in discussion here or on the talk page for Iranian Queer Organization instead of reverting the article to a previous version? There are several problems with the version that you and other new editors (User:Degarbash, User:Irqo.pglo) have been promoting.

Your version removes the organization's founder, Arsham Parsi. The article is currently undergoing a deletion discussion and it's important that the references remain in place to establish the organization's notability. Sentences like The path to freedom outside of Iran is filled with unexpected problems. are unencyclopaedic and do not convey any meaningful information. I've added the board members to the infobox, since this seems to be something you wanted to include. Phone numbers and emails are not included on wikipedia articles. Also, Category:LGBT IRQO rights organizations is not a legitimate category. Thanks, Gobonobo ^T ^C 11:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gobonobo

thanks for the directions. i will forward your points to chief of board of IRQO Mrs. Saghi Ghahraman. So they can edit it in the standard way and then we will edit it again.

Thanks. I see that Parsi has left the organization and have included that in the article as well. Gobonobo ^T ^C 11:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. i really appreciate your help and i am sure the board of IRQO will too. after Mr. Parsi left the IRQO there is lots of interfere happens in resources of IRQO. so the board is really care about changes in important resources like Wikipedia about the correct information. Raham20 (talk) 12:16, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Iranian Queer Organization has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://ketabkhane88.blogfa.com/. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The external links to blogs has copy right. Raham20 (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JoopeA (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://pride.joopea.info/home/iran-in-amsterdam-pride-sponsors/equal-rights-supporters/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:JoopeA may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 10:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RahamRaf! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 10:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JoopeA Foundation (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JoopeA Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JoopeA Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 23:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Legacypac,

you might flag this as non notable because you've probably searched 'JoopeA Foundation'. The word 'foundation' usually drops a lot of results from showing in search engine. I wonder if you could search 'JoopeA' again? The results will show the notability.

Regards, Raham 03:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IranPride Day has been accepted

IranPride Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Catrìona (talk) 20:23, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RahamRaf, thank you so much for writing this article. I have nominated it to appear on the main page. If you have any suggestions for alternate "hooks" or better wording, I would welcome your input. Catrìona (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Catrìona. It's really appreciated. Your suggested hook is perfect. I'd try to improve the post more continuously. Raham 07:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for IranPride Day

On 9 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article IranPride Day, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite homosexuality being punishable by death, Iranian LGBT activists celebrate IranPride Day (logo pictured) by secretly photographing themselves holding rainbow flags in Tehran? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/IranPride Day. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, IranPride Day), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cas Liber. I've took a look at statistics. I's very interesting. Thanks a lot for the info. Btw, the page was on the mainpage too couple of days ago. It was amazing :) Raham 10:19, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Elham Malekpoor Arashlu

Hi, I'm Rosguill. RahamRaf, thanks for creating Elham Malekpoor Arashlu!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article's subject may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The best way to demonstrate notability is to provide citations to in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources that are not affiliated with Elham Malekpoor Arashlu. Currently, all of the sources offering in-depth coverage of Elham appear to either have employed or published her.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:04, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosguill, thanks for the tip. I do my best to fix the issue as soon as possible. Raham 10:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JoopeA (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JoopeA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JoopeA, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Joopea-logo.png

The file File:Joopea-logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Useless file

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CptViraj (Talk) 04:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:JoopeA

Hello, Renamed user kejfwe92u9kfo34440fk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "JoopeA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 04:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]