Jump to content

User talk:Rim sim/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

I noticed that you were new and/or have yet to receive any messages so I just thought I'd pop in to say "hello". Hello. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, Wikipedia is often not straight forward but there is a good starting point by reading the links on Help:Getting started. since it's so big but we won't bite so Be Bold and get what you know down in microchips! If you do make a mistake, that's fine, we'll assume good faith and just correct you: it'll take a few seconds maximum! Here, however, are a few links to get you started:

There are lots of policies and guidelines to get to grips with but they all make your life easier and your stay more fun in the long run. Make sure edits are verifyable to a reliable source. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or add {{helpme}} to your userpage - someone will come very, very quickly to your aid. Please be sure to sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? ;)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a great time, all the best, sayonara and good luck!-- Rim sim (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rim sim, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Rim sim!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:40, Sunday, November 10, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together


ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is section header of discussion.The discussion is about the topic topic. Thank you. 113.172.88.157 (talk) 10:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have temporarily blocked The basis of for disrupting WP:NORN with rambling forum-style discussions. They seem to disagree with you about something concerning your edits at Western world. Do you have any idea what that's about? Take a look at their talkpage. I have advised them on the appropriate way to discuss or challenge edits, but I don't think they're listening. Acroterion (talk) 13:27, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Considering classical architecture and history, are not part of any emergence of the Western world, as pointed at my talk page? Back then, the only concept of the world was "of an all-round conflict". It goes along with Ancient world and indeed, after pre-Christian brutality. Instead we are to consider the western triumphal reference provided by author Rim sim on 19 November, to understand an ancient Western world before the Schism of 1054? That would be Western architecture specifically, inheritance from the Classical world of conflicted early european empires and emperors.
I repeat once more that emergence of Western culture (architectural, linguistic) rather is rooted definitely in the emergence of Christianity throughout the rise of the Classical Roman-Greek principles and christian supremacy as well, but not the Western world; this instead, emerged from the Christian east-west Schism of 1054, well into the Dark Ages (historiography), just as the page stated before 19 November. Sure I am that Late Antiquity is often misinterpreted, a period leading into the Dark Ages, because it is the eve of the spread of Christianity throughout all of Europe that made Christianity the continent's uniting cultural subset of white people (right about when, and later in opposition to, the Islam's religious spread in the Middle East, by the way). Then also as hinted before, revisions by Rim sim would be around the topic of the North-South divide (white people versus the southern populations), not really about the Western world which is about white people but not necessarily (see Latin America and Eastern Europe plenty of whites, but not Western world). The basis of (talk) 09:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusion is that Western world is not a concept rooted in the emergence of the Roman Republic through the Classical ancient Roman-Greek worlds, which would anticipate the whole spread of Christianity throughout Europe from the Dark Ages; it is rooted in the Christian East-West schism of 1054 instead, and by any source especially. This is about the very first sentence added on top of previous version on 19 November by user Rim sim: undeniably wrong.
The concept of "the West" first came into existence with the emergence of the Roman Republic, the roots of which can be traced back to Ancient Greece.
Instead whole revision by the user (user coming from editing the world of industrial porn acting) has been substantially accepted over mine. The basis of (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pornography

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pornography you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 08:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pornography

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pornography, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pornography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stress.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pornography

[edit]

The article Pornography you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pornography for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shaktism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Godhead.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban violations

[edit]

Rim sim, as far as I can see, your topic ban imposed ten years ago (AE log) which you were later blocked for violating [1] was never lifted. As such you should not be editing any content about India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan. If I have missed where this was modified, please let me know. Callanecc This is an old sanction, but do you recall whether this was lifted? If not, how do you feel it ought to be enforced? A large number of Rim sim's contributions for the last year have been violations. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it was ever lifted but it's been long enough that I may be wrong. I'm keen to hear what Rim sim has to say about that before commenting on any further steps. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was actually unblocked from that ban about two weeks later [2]. Logging back after many years, checked if there are any further blocks on my account and there were none [3]. Started to edit again only from then, regards. Rim sim (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're confused between a block and a ban. A block appears in the block log while the topic ban was imposed in the message I left on your talk page at the time. At the time I also explained that "this means that you cannot make any edit related to India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan, broadly construed, anywhere on Wikipedia until you successfully appeal that sanction." Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my confusion, at that time I made quite a few appeals on talk pages and left Wikipedia altogether after removal of that block. Over the last few years since coming back I am understanding how wikipedia works and have made some positive contributions so far. I hope that topic ban on my account is lifted as it was imposed a very long time ago when I was just an amateur who started editing. Rim sim (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Rim sim, to be able to edit topics related to India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan you would need to successfully appeal the topic ban. Generally you should do this at WP:AN or WP:AE. See Wikipedia:Contentious topics#Appeals and amendments for more information on how that works. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban lifted

[edit]

Hi Rim sim, following your appeal on AN I've lifted your topic ban. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rim_sim/Archive_1&oldid=1206559532"