User talk:Selfworm
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| DS Notice, Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections |
|---|
 This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
| Disambiguation link notification for March 19 |
|---|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tunguska event, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Around the World (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC) |
| References |
|---|
 |
| Disambiguation link notification for April 16 |
|---|
|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camponotus saundersi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
| Keith Raniere Merge |
|---|
|
Selfworm, I did merge the content for Keith Raniere. Check the talk page I gave the diff! Why would you revert WP:BOLD instead of consulting me first? If there's a problem then WP:DIY. Waddie96 (talk) 07:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
|
| Note |
|---|
|
Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here. General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:
- Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
- We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources. (For the difference between primary and secondary sources, see WP:MEDDEF.)
- Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS). High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
- The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
- We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
- More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, how to format citations quickly and easily.
- Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
- We use very few capital letters and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
- Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities.
- Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article.
- Please format citations consistently within an article and be sure to cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books; see WP:MEDHOW for how to format citations.
- Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
- Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.
Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.
– the WikiProject Medicine team Jytdog (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
2018 missile strikes against Syria
[edit]Just curious, Selfworm, about how in this debate you've mentioned my name several times with no reference to where I made any assertiona about what the title of that article should be. Other than your mentions, my name is only seen as a relister who made a comment. I have not participated in that debete. Please explain. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 19:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I was used to assuming that the user tag that appears at the very end of a comment is always the user tag of the person who wrote the comment. I had never before seen something of the form:
06:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC) --Relisted. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 23:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I don't remember what I was thinking at the moment but I must have automatically assumed either that (1) you had the word "--Relisted." as part of your user tag for whatever reason or that (2) the word "--Relisted." was the last word of the comment just before your signature, as in:
[...] One happened just today. Editor abcdef (talk) 06:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC) --Relisted.
where I thought that it was meant that the thing that "happened just today" was done by "Editor abcdef" at "06:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)". I now see that my assumption was incorrect. Learn something new every day I guess. My apologies for incorrectly referring to you when I should have referred to Editor abcdef. Would you like for me to strike out your name in my comments and place Editor abcdef's name next to it? selfwormTalk) 19:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation. Probably best to replace the instances you made to show Editor abcdef as having written those things. If I decide to close the debate, it would be confusing to other editors, since closers cannot also be participants. Thanks again! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 20:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Selfworm, as far as indentation goes, it's best to use extra indentation (add two colons instead of one, ::) when not using bullets after replying to a bulleted comment, or it will appear to have the same amount of indentation as what it's replying to. Also, it is probably not necessary to remind participants that move discussions are not votes; discussions are closed by uninvolved administrators or page movers who are well aware of this. While I have no real opinion on the move request itself (as I was the previous closer), I would be happy to address a few of the assumptions you made in your "supportive arguments" that might not hold up under scrutiny. For example, we do not preemptively disambiguate article titles. Per WP:D, disambiguation only takes place when "there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead," not when there are other things in the real world that might make the title ambiguous. We fix ambiguous links all the time whenever the need arises (I've done thousands myself), but again, WP:CRYSTAL is part of policy. And "no good argument against it" is a reasonable standard, but not the one we employ per WP:TITLECHANGES, which is instead "if there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed." On the other hand, in this case the current title is relatively new, so there is less of an assumption that the title should remain in place. Dekimasuよ! 18:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information! selfwormTalk) 19:16, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
| Alzheimer's disease research |
|---|
|
Hello Selfworm. There are editing vulnerabilities in the article on AD research because one assumes a wide range of primary research to systematic reviews might be available. Concerning this edit, 1) the review on lithium had little to do with AD research, providing only one outdated inconclusive study; follow WP:MEDDATE for choosing recent reviews. 2) PMID 24766396 is speculative with no clinical results to offer. 3) the Danish study you cited seems to be a stretch for having relevance to AD, and may be WP:OR. This is a tutorial for choosing strong medical references. Jytdog provided you with excellent guidelines above; it's worth the time to review and apply them. Good luck. --Zefr (talk) 02:24, 27 May 2018 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Selfworm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Selfworm/VandalizeMe
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Selfworm/VandalizeMe, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
- It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 10:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Do you have a source at hand for your addition in the article's lead ([1])?--Kmhkmh (talk) 02:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Subgroup test for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subgroup test until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ebony Jackson (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
"China Insights" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect China Insights and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 31#China Insights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Category:Investigations has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Investigations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 22:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Periodic table (van der Waals radius)
[edit]
Template:Periodic table (van der Waals radius) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
[edit]An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Władysław Franciszek Jabłonowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosco.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)