User talk:Sky Attacker/March-June 2009

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Sky Attacker, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Jac16888 ^Talk 18:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Thanks

No problem. A few websites that could be of use for Cathedral (band) related page would be discogs.com, blabbermouth.net, metalunderground.com, metal-rules.com, non-review sections of allmusic.com, any music-related magazine (Kerrang! Decibel, Revolver, among others), and others. As for the photo thing, I'm not really experienced in uploading photos on wikipedia, but I want to be someday. I'll probably bring it to the attention of someone on wikipedia. I hope you have a great time on wikipedia. Backtable^{Speak to Me}about what I have done 03:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My reply to your reply

You should check official sources this type of debate - for that, Spirit of Metal is nowhere near as reliable compared to Cathedral's then record company, Earache. Here's their catalogue page for Soul Sacrifice (MOSH40): [1]. The track list for that EP is:

1. Soul Sacrifice
2. Autumn Twilight
3. Frozen Rapture
4. Golden Blood (Flooding)

So, these three last tracks are not originally from the Statik Majik EP, something that isn't pointed out in the article (but should be).

There's also this release, which might be the reason you are mixing things up: [2]. It is a combinations of both EPs in a single disc, released in 1999... A proof that the original Statik Majik had only four tracks. Musicaindustrial (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Keep on doing the good work. Musicaindustrial (talk) 10:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would?

Haha. After that edit I was wondering about the centering bit and then forgot it and got caught up with other things. FireCrystal (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 7th Studio Album

Thanks, !voted :-) I've !voted delete, with a comment that the article can be recreated once it has a name confirmed by a WP:RS. Although policy is usually to wait until an album charts, I think that in this case the band are sufficiently notable to have an article on an as-yet unreleased album, but we should at the very least wait until its name is confirmed.

Incidentally, it might be worth removing the {{prod}}-tag while we gather consensus for deleting/keeping - anyone can contest a {{prod}}-tag simply be removing it - the worst that could happen is either someone else re-adds it, or sends the article to articles for deletion (in which case we just shift the debate from the talk page to the AFD page). I wouldn't do either, however, since there's a discussion ongoing about it.

Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 14:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dont Hang Up

Thank you for adding the in-line citations. Good job. I've removed the tage. I made a few more edits to the article and added an infobox as well. You may want to check or add to the article as you see fit. --Wolfer68 (talk) 16:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hehe, thanks. :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sky Attacker. You have new messages at Bongomatic's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bongo matic 06:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Can you help?

I once did an article called Industrial rock sales and awards. It might help you out. Also try the Rockdetector site ([3]); their band discography section has chart placements. Cheers. Musicaindustrial (talk) 13:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re mexico

Mexico is still the main focus of the outbreak. The reason that the United States is leading in labratory cases (and is where the virus was first detected as a 'new' strain) is that the Untied States excells in labratory testing. Mexicos numbers are low because (1) Mexico is full of Tijuana doctors. (2) The Mexican goverment put a moratorum on releasing new numbers. (3) Mexico shut down most of their cities, its very likely many people with flu like symptoms are staying home trying to ride out the illness on knockoff drugs and home remedies over fears that going to the hospital will put them in contact with sick people. Put hey thats just my opinion. --PigFlu Oink (talk) 23:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Most active editors set up archiving which is done automatically by a bot every 5 or 7 days (per your desire) and moves old content to an archive in case you need to look it up in future. Cheerios. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:36, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this edit

wtf? :) Drzamich (talk) 13:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I didn't write that sentence. Please look through the edit history.-5- (talk) 21:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from SchnitzelMannGreek

Thanks for asking:) I'm not from 3 different countries but from America-i was born there. But my heritage includes half greek(the blue flag) and half assyrian. Assyrians are also known as syriacs or aramaics(jesus spoke aramaic) and they come from the north Middle-East. They aren't Jewish or Arab..but are similar in food. But I was born in America. Again, Thanks for asking:)User:SchnitzelMannGreek 03:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suicidal Lemming

No they weren't. He reverted his edit and instead put it on my talk page. Thanks for being concerned. Marcus2 (talk) 12:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overmilk

Haha, for sure it is. One of the most ridiculous articles I have ever seen. AeonicOmega (talk) 07:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The overmilk's AfD

Hello. Currently The overmilk is nominated for speedy deletion (see the top of the article), so there's no need to bring it to AfD. If the author fails to give a valid reason to keep the article (which is very likely to happen, as the article is pure rubbish), it will be deleted soon. You can leave your opinion on the article's talk page if you feel it's necessary. Regards. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted by an admin. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Gin

It's all getting a bit silly, isn't it? I've responded on the deletion discussion, thanks for the heads-up. TrulyBlue (talk) 11:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism patrol

Thanks for working in concert with Nakon to deal with that while I was AFK. Tyciol (talk) 20:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Mario Semi-Protection Bros.

Hey there! That article is currently the featured article of the day. It is usually discouraged to protect the featured article and it is best to discuss it first. If you feel it is becoming incredibly unmanageble post a thread about it on WP:AN. Thank you for keeping an eye on the article though :).¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:53, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thank You

Not a problem :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 23:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

db-spam

Just wondering what this was about. There isn't anything in there that promotes the book. It's more of a hoax or a sideways attack than a spam page. Is there anything in particular that you saw that made you see it as promotional?--Terrillja _talk 00:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sky Attacker. You have new messages at Equendil's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Remove please

Im not sure what you're asking. The article name you gave me doesn't exist. The article apparently has never existed as there is no deletion log. And if you are asking me to delete it, you're asking the wrong person. Administrators are the only ones who can delete an article, and I'm not an admin. Anyone can, however, post a deletion template, which will bring it to the admin's attention. Note, there are three different types of deletion tags, AfD, prod, and speedy delete. Drew Smith W hat I've done 11:15, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yellow Air Taxi

An article that you have been involved in editing, Yellow Air Taxi, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow Air Taxi. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request

I'm not an admin, anyway. :) Sorry. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 19:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userpages

Quick note: Users are allowed to remove warnings from their own user pages, and generally reformat them at will. See WP:BLANKING. There's no need to revert anyone removing warnings from their pages. henrik•talk 05:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the user has been indef blocked, you can also just replace the contents of their talk and user page with {{indef}}. That has tended to get people to move on most of the time IME.--Terrillja _talk 05:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sky Attacker. You have new messages at Bsadowski1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bsadowski1 (talk) 02:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hotshot (game)

It does now. Sorry, I've gotten a habit of sending the adws before I load the preloaded AfD and fill it in. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 01:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Association of Sporting Events for Rabbits

You mentioned that the article might be OK after Wikifying. What is that and how is it done? I would like to do it or have it done asap, to see if it can be saved from deletion!Gyldwiz (talk) 14:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Delete

To answer your question about what I meant about Snow Delete, I meant Delete and close per WP:SNOW Eauhomme (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:your message on my page

Hello, Sky Attacker. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

re:Translate

Cool, thanks for the notification :), feel free to move the talk page to the main page (if it meets inclusion standards) and add it to the pages needing cleanup after translation if it needs that - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 21:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions on User_talk:AskMissA

Hello, Sky Attacker. You have new messages at Meiskam's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reply

Somebody is already looking into it. Thanks for stopping by. Until It Sleeps 04:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More info is on my talk page as well. Until It Sleeps 04:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Mailei

Hey Sky Attacker. I think I fixed the article on Marcus Mailei. Do you think you can look it over and get rid of the Lacking Inline Citations box at the top? Thanks. Eagles247

Thanks and will do.

nice work...

...right here. Drmies (talk) 01:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Hello, I would like to know why you deleted my additions to Adam Saab's wiki page? Do you know Adam?

Thanks,

hlukeh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.255.77 (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On WIki v. Off Wiki

As far as I know, I've never met anyone here off wiki. I also don't use e-mail and am not in communication with anyone here outside of Wikipedia. At some point I may decide it's worth responding to e-mails. But life is complicated enough communicating on Wikipedia and I like the idea of everything I do here being out in the open. Cheers. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thank you

You're very much welcome. Mouse Nightshirt | talk 00:54, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hey

Thanks for the comment. I appreciate it. :) Acebulf (talk) 02:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sky Attacker. You have new messages at Noosentaal's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I be blocked again? Just because this person says so? PLEASE tell me why, seriously ThePizzaMakingCaveman (talk) 05:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hee hee

I just had to drop by and say I got a chuckle out of your edit summaries, thanks for the laugh before I went to sleep! Ariel♥Gold 09:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey vandalism fighter,

I filed a report on a BLP violation that you've been active with also, see [4]. BTW, I do feel the need to chastise you for belitting the importance of the colors of doors. If it were the color of pills, and you were in The Matrix, you would feel differently, wouldn't you? Well, do you know for sure you're not in The Matrix now? Ha! Drmies (talk) 16:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 16:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Latvian charts

Instead of fixing the redlinks, the best thing to do is delete the chart entry: all the Latvian charts are on WP:BADCHARTS.—Kww(talk) 04:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All deleted as a result of WP:Articles for deletion/Latvian_Airplay_Top.—Kww(talk) 05:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Just doing my part to keep Wikipedia clean and accurate. Have a great day! Thanks for the note :) HarlandQPitt (talk) 06:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No article allowed?

Hi Sky Attacher, Just wondering why you deleted my article. For users in the german section of wiki, prinz should obviously redirect/bring up pages 'princes' but for english, I don't believe a redirect is needed. Obviously this is a small article at this stage but I will be elaborating on it over the next few days with photos, gigography, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukemunn (talk • contribs) 10:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your message

Hello, Sky Attacker. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you

Thank you, I'm doing my best. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sky, given his history, you would do well to encourage Johnny to stop stalking my article contributions. Wikipedia has lots and lots of articles to work on. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ChildofMidnight, you'd do well not to delete well-sourced, non-contentious material from an article purely because I added it as you did here[5]. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well-sourced, non-contentious? My Macquarie Dictionary begs to differ. Orderinchaos 15:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Film series

You caught me as I was adding the sub articles. Just checking that you agree that all should be deleted. Darrenhusted (talk) 21:35, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

The Soundgarden articles are some of the articles I maintain, and I like to keep articles consistent. Per Wikipedia MOS, years shouldn't be linked - Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Dates.-5- (talk) 06:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is that supposed to mean?-5- (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certain that they still have many fans.-5- (talk) 06:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I enjoy their music.-5- (talk) 06:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice list. I see that you've yet to tire of Black Hole Sun.

I guess I could list my favorites from each album:

Ultramega OK - Flower, Beyond the Wheel, He Didn't

Louder than Love - Hands All Over, Loud Love, Big Dumb Sex

Badmotorfinger - Besides the singles, Searching with My Good Eye Closed, Room a Thousand Years Wide, Mind Riot, Holy Water, New Damage

Superunknown - Basically the whole album

DOTU - Pretty Noose, Burden in My Hand (favorite Soundgarden song), Overfloater, Boot Camp-5- (talk) 06:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to reveal too much personally, but no. Socialising is not something that comes very easy to me.-5- (talk) 06:32, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, pleasure to make your acquaintance.-5- (talk) 06:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Communication

Hi

I spent the whole day writing on COMMUNICATION

I understand someone is functoning as a gatekeeper of wiki but currently we have on wiki this ancient stuff about encoder and decoder, Communication 1 Primary School texbook 1951. Please help me and tell me about the process by which we can CHANGE that primary school text from 1951 to something more modern?

So in short - what will happen to my article and will it have an impact and therefore WHY I DID BOTHER?

I guess many of us have ths question

Thnak you cheers :-)

ania

Hi

I spent the whole day writing on COMMUNICATION

I understand someone is functoning as a gatekeeper of wiki but currently we have on wiki this ancient stuff about encoder and decoder, Communication 1 Primary School texbook 1951. Please help me and tell me about the process by which we can CHANGE that primary school text from 1951 to something more modern?

So in short - what will happen to my article and will it have an impact and therefore WHY I DID BOTHER?

I guess many of us have ths question

Thnak you cheers :-)

ania

Hey

Hey, Sky Attacker. First let me say that I did not intend to overwrite the previous user's edit when I made this change. I simply wanted to add information to the previous version. Second, as an inexperienced Wikipedia user, I would like to appeal to you that, as a matter of fact, this law is by and large unenforced (with the exception of a highly publicized instance in Jackson, MS, I believe). I live in Starkville, MS, and I can say for a fact that Fantasy Land in Columbus, MS has sold sex toys for years without interference. While it would be difficult to compile a full and accurate list of adult stores in Mississippi with their history regarding state interference, a quick google will at least show that a large number of them in operation. I'm not sure that there has ever been an actual prosecution regarding this law, so I believe that it should be mentioned in the article that the law is largely unenforced. It would be inaccurate to imply otherwise. I only wish for an accurate representation of the reality, and I think the paragraph is misleading as is. Dbb49 (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly nod

I must say that I much admire you and others like you for taking on this immense responsibility of anti-vandalizing Wikipedia. Keep it up. (Although you do ruin a fun night of ridiculing Twilight.)

-deanoffail —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deanoffail (talk • contribs) 08:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wabbits

I just made my first exit. I asked someone else if it was a good edit. Can you check it too? I had to use brackets like the other blue words had to make it work. Is this correct?

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunthamund (talk • contribs) 01:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Man's Talkback Notice

My page, you know the drill. :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 23:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You got new message

Hello, Sky Attacker. You have new messages at 98.154.26.247's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey Legend,

keep up the good work. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 04:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Substituting warning templates

You are doing great work reverting vandalism, but one thing that I noticed is that you are not substituting the user warning templates. All of the warning templates should be substituted when used. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:21, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Yes, just add subst: before the template name. For example, {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}. See Wikipedia:Substitution if you want extra details. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"electronic rock" not in the intro

skyattacker i thought we had discussed this "electronic rock" genre. its ok to have it among the list of genres (and its there!).....but not as main descriptor in the Intro! they were not always "electronic rock". listen to speak&spell, a broken frame, construction time again, violator etc etc...."electronic rock" only applies to some of their latest work ( some tracks from 93 on). how would "electronic rock" fit with tunes like "Get the balance Right", "Just can't get enough", "everything counts","world in my eyes", "halo" etc etc? (theres no rock elements in those). the main genre that would represent better their career is "synthpop"....but "electronic" is probably even better as its even more generic. personally i would just have "music band" in the intro.....but "electronic" is acceptable as its the common denominator of these 30 years of depeche mode music. regardsSequencer10 (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]