User talk:Smsslove

September 2023

Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Barrister Babu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Smsslove. I added the plot and the cast of the sequel of Barrister Babu, (which was there until a few weeks ago) Smsslove (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Rejoy2003. I noticed that you recently removed content from Aishwarya Sharma without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 13:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was a mistake. I was about to add more detail about her latest show but my system got off. Smsslove (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is filled with unreliable citations. Smsslove (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Neil Bhatt, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Smsslove. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ayesha singh, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Smsslove. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Smsslove|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits.

I just make edits in order to contribute to Wikipedia. Smsslove (talk) 14:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. You remain unfamiliar with the requirements of articles in mainspace. Please use (and respect) AFC, or you risk losing access to edit non draft articles. Star Mississippi 13:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to the article "Mohit Kumar (actor)" which I created and there was no issue regarding the same. Issues only raised when I edited the drafts created by someone else. Blocking from editing is preventing us from further contribution. Smsslove (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, I never made any wrong edits after the warning. I would like to get a bit of guidance in something: are we allowed to publish the article soon after completing it or are there any other procedures? Smsslove (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every account should only be used by one person.

There is no requirement to use AfC, but I believe you should because you are not yet experienced enough with the intricacies of editing here and there are issues with the article about Kumar that have been raised. Star Mississippi 02:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand. Thank you for your guidance and sincere apology for my ignorance. Smsslove (talk) 02:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I got a message recently after one article of mine got published:

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

So what do you think? Smsslove (talk) 02:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

as I said, you're not required to use AfC, no one who is extended confirmed is. However I think you would benefit from more experience. It's not an easy process. Using AfC only helps you create stronger articles. Star Mississippi 03:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thank you so much. Smsslove (talk) 05:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayesha Singh (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear factors have changed since the AfD.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayesha Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 00:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smsslove! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 00:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayesha Singh (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayesha Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 03:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't under stand why this is happening. There are many other actors and actresses with the same sources but their article have been published. Smsslove (talk) 03:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

many other articles exist.

Please stop re-submitting it without improving or you will be blocked. Star Mississippi 03:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After the article had been rejected two days ago, the article was edited, added proper citations and details. Still it was rejected without a proper explanation. Smsslove (talk) 04:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was declined, not rejected. @Tails Wx explained exactly why. Continuing to resubmit it doesn't change the outcome if you don't improve the article. Star Mississippi 04:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have made proper citations using reliable sources. On referring other articles, I found that they have used exactly the same citations for the biography of those people but their article is published. Smsslove (talk) 04:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple editors have told you why the sourcing is insufficient. Adding more that don't address the issues of depth, nor the community consensus isn't going to help. You have yet to address your focus on this article either. Star Mississippi 13:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I would advice you to refer to the article Aishwarya Sharma which is poorly cited and shows no relevant works other than the show Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin. Smsslove (talk) 06:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe Sharma isn't notable, you're welcome to nominate that for deletion. Star Mississippi 12:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want a proper explanation to why this has been rejected. Smsslove (talk) 03:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: please note that the article has now been copied and pasted to article space despite being declined. Ayesha singh was used (note the lower case for the surname to circumvent the salting of Ayesha Singh). In my view, this is completely unacceptable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayesha Singh (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

You made no edits.Continued re-submission without addressing the issues is disruptive. Please make all relevant declarations or you risk being blocked.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayesha Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 03:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayesha Singh (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I checked the added sources and none of them give in-depth coverage.

This draft is filled with unreliable sources. And random Google search links are not sources.

I recommend rejection if the issues are not addressed on the next review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayesha Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 09:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durga Aur Charu (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submission is almost entirely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Durga Aur Charu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I have provided enough citations from reliable sources. Smsslove (talk) 09:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayesha singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ayesha singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayesha Singh (3rd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was creating the articles for actresses in the List of Top Television Actresses and Ayesha Singh was the first one. I found a draft and submitted the draft for revaluation after adding citations but it kept on getting declined. Being a newbie to this field, I thought it was the fault of the draft that was prepared earlier. Thus, I created a new article. The same thing happened while I was editing the article Durga Aur Charu.

This is not a case of paid advocacy. Smsslove (talk) 11:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What made you decide to create the article at Ayesha singh even though you clearly saw that Ayesha Singh is blocked from creation for good reason? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayesha Singh was not blocked. It just needed more citations. Smsslove (talk) 00:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was, which is why you disruptively created it in lower case. Star Mississippi 02:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was intending to re write the entire draft. creating a new article was not my intention. I was surprised that the article got published and I thought that it got accepted because of the new citations I added in the re-written article. I copied the details in the draft and pasted it. I thought I was re writing the draft but only when I received the speedy deletion nomination notification did I realize what happened in real.

My intention was to improve the draft not to do something that violates any rules. It was a mistake from my part due to my lack of experience in this field. I apologize. Smsslove (talk) 04:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've been told the draft is not ready, disruptively re-creating it in mainspace is not the solution. Consider this a final warning, or you will be blocked. Star Mississippi 12:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durga Aur Charu (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

First of all, the plot section is too long. MOS:PLOT suggests 700 word max. Secondly, many of the sources only briefly talk about the closure of the show and are not in-depth. Interviews of people who are involved in the creation of the series are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Durga Aur Charu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Indian television actors

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Indian television actors appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 07:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durga Aur Charu (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on fictional subjects should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance—not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article, such as Durga Aur Charu. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Durga Aur Charu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•growths)} 15:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Priyanka Chahar Choudhary has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Priyanka Chahar Choudhary. Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I read the comment. But doesn't the citations provided prove that the article pass the criteria? Smsslove (talk) 07:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Required citations have been added. Enough citations are provided to prove that the subject in the article passes the eligibility criteria. But there are a lot of music videos done by the same which has no in depth articles. Smsslove (talk) 13:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The citations that has been used- Times of India, Hindustan Times, etc are considered the most reliable sources for most articles. Take a look on the article Aishwarya Sharma and it can be noted that it has even much less reliable sources yet got published. Smsslove (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neha Rana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neha Rana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neha Rana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 07:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just created the article. You are free to make changes to improve the same or delte it if you feel that it violates any of the rules. Smsslove (talk) 14:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chahar Choudhary has been accepted

Priyanka Chahar Choudhary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the article? Why is it missing after it got reviewed? Smsslove (talk) 03:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to bring in to your attention that the above said article has been deleted from Wikipedia. It was deleted earlier but many creates contributed to the draft and finally I did my contributions and submitted the draft to get it approved and published. I want to know the reason it was deleted. Smsslove (talk) 05:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been deleted five times. While in their actions as an AFC reviewer @TechnoSquirrel69 believed your draft addressed those deletions, @JBW did not, and the deletion was within his remit as an admin (as it was Squirrel's as a reviewer). If you believe the deletion is incorrect, you may open a deletion review. Star Mississippi 14:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to know the mistakes in the article as such mistakes can be avoided later on. I am not in for any other review. Thank you for the message. Smsslove (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is the same issues as we've addressed above, consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Choudhary showed sourcing wasn't enough depth. Just mentioning Choudhary isn't sufficient, it needs to be about her work. Given the number of deletions, a new article is going to be a higher barrier to acceptance. Star Mississippi 20:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Smsslove! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 15:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isha Malviya (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

Do you have any source other than Times of India? ToI(and just Indian news industry in general) have inadequate disclosures for paid news content. See WP:TOI. Words like "web desk", lack of byline, and overtly promotional wordings are sign of paid-for articles. Also, most of the sources, even if reliable, are 75% unedited quotes and short announcements that the actress is going to be featured in a film or whatever.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isha Malviya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ishaan Dhawan (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ishaan Dhawan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 02:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You posted to the Twinkle talk page, which is for discussion related to the operation of the Twinkle gadget. Please ask questions at the Help desk. 331dot (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Isha Malviya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isha Malviya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isha Malviya (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.