User talk:Soura Chhandak

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Soura Chhandak. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! JaventheAldericky (talk) 03:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bappi Lahiri has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bappi Lahiri was changed by Soura Chhandak (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907606 on 2018-11-21T03:51:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sunny Deol filmography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tolly 4 bolly 03:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Betaab, you may be blocked from editing. Tolly 4 bolly 10:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soura Chhandak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Soura Chhandak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Darr. Shellwood (talk) 19:05, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shararat (2002 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding unsourced changes, and changes from the actual sources KylieTastic (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reshma Aur Shera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 12:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ajith Kumar filmography, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 13:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Till Not Known but in Future Who Knows

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Till Not Known but in Future Who Knows requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 22:22, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 22:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prakash Kaur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prakash Kaur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. From AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 22:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 22:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Soura Chhandak,

If you write another purely negative article, you will receive a block. Please find a productive and positive way to spend your time on Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Killer Chihuahua 23:30, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luck (2009 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Italic and Gujrati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Braun Strowman, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:40, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Luck (2009 film). Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. N.J.A. | talk 18:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For blocking the account

Please retrieve my account I will not add any wrong information and I am sorry for my work Soura Chhandak (talk) 03:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]