User talk:Total-MAdMaN

Hello, Total-MAdMaN, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Invitation to tea

Hello! Total-MAdMaN, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Charles (talk) 19:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I keep bumping into you around the newbies' contributions page and you are one of the best newbies I've seen in the time I've been here! Here's a barnstar for your great work! AndieM (Leave a message!) 19:44, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COIN

Hey, I seen you've made a lot of reports at WP:COIN lately. I haven't looked into many of them but it looks like they're all great cases for the noticeboard. Keep up the great work! OlYeller21^Talktome 17:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your reports to UAA Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 14:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Total-MAdMaN, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thank you for your efforts to keep the encyclopedia well-referenced and free of vandalism. Keep up the good work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Rock Festival

Please stop reverting my last contribution to this article. "...that has been existed" is not an English sentence. Morgan Katarn (talk) 15:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase in the article is "that has existed" not "that has been existed" and is a grammatically correct phrase. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but please stop reverting my edits to other articles like to Kazuya Mishima. I changed the phrase from "he" to his name because otherwise it is not sure who is meant. Morgan Katarn (talk) 17:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverts

I already told you to stop reverting some of my useful edits. If you continue doing so, I'll be slowly forced to inform an admin about your behavior. Just stop! Master Katarn (talk) 13:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The revert of your Darth Vader edit was because "Born as" is not the term used on the English Wikipedia to refer to someone's birth name. See Mickey Rooney or Marilyn Manson, both of which use "born" not "born as". The Stacy Kiebler revert was because it was unsourced. A statement about a person's heritage needs to be backed up by reliable sources. If the German Wikipedia has such sources you should add them. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 13:17, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, about Darth Vader I face the truth and I'm looking for a reliable source for Stacy Keibler. If I find something then please stop reverting my edit on this article. Master Katarn (talk) 13:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert, to the article Scorpion is very unacceptable. Please stop it. A ninja makes automatically Ninjitsu und I provided a link for my last edit to this article too. Ninjitsu is alternatively created by Ninjas. M0RG@N (talk) 14:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true in real life, but in the Mortal Kombat games neither Scorpion nor Sub Zero have ever used Ninjitsu. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 15:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vale recreation fc article

Hi, you've marked the vale recreation fc article that it needs additional verification, what does need additional? I have quoted a number of external websites. Thanks (Darrylgsy (talk) 18:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

The websites listed don't meet the criteria for reliable sources. Two are the club's own site and one is just a page that someone set up to list results. The only one that might be considered a reliable source is the TheFA.com. I'd suggest adding references showing that that the people listed in the Notable Former Players section played for the club and backing up the third and sixth paragraphs in the Overview section. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 19:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit surprised that you have chosen this page to cite for mistakes, as you will have seen I have made some effort to get as much information as possible. I have found dozens of other club article sthat have no references what so ever but they are still left without any additional verificaiton noted. At least I have some, I know some are just the clubs site, but this shows that the infomation is correct? I am new to all of this and would appreciate some allownaces?

Some of those players were playing when there was no Internet so finding articles is not going to be easy. As for the part referencing the stat site, as this were matches player over 20 years ago not sure what else I can do? The site contains records for hundreds of clubs including professional ones. I will of course try and find some other articles. (Darrylgsy (talk) 10:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

(Talk page stalker) Don't judge one page with another. Every page has to abide by the rules and we cannot look at every page. I only look at new articles for example. I think there is enough refs now, but will let Total-MAdMaN be the judge. However, section headings shouldn't have refs. Need to put the refs inside the section somewhere. Bgwhite (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BLP prods

Please do not add a BLPPROD tag if any reference, reliable or unreliable, is present in the article. Jake LeDoux did have an IMDb reference. While this is an unreliable ref, it is a ref that sources statements made in the article. A more appropriate tag would have been {{BLP IMDB refimprove}}. Bgwhite (talk) 07:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir

Dear Sir We tried to publish an article on NGO (Foundation for the Future) but it was blocked by Wikipedia. We don´t know the reason and we don´t really know how to publish it. Could you help us or explain us what we are doing wrong? Best regards, Dima, http://foundationforfuture.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dima123 (talk • contribs) 11:30, June 13, 2012‎ (UTC)

The reason the article was deleted was because there was no indication of why the foundation was notable. On Wikipedia for an article to stick around for any length of time it needs to demonstrate notability of the subject backed up by independent sources. I'd first recommend reading through the links listed in the welcome on your Talk page. That should show you how to create an article that won't be swiftly deleted after creation. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 21:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent speedy deletion tag

I noticed that you tagged Netflix machine for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag from the article because it does not meet the criterion specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging articles for speedy deletion. "Neologism" is not a valid criteria for deletion. elektrik SHOOS (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rehoboth?

Can you check the spelling on that one? I can't find an account to consider blocking. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd. There should be an account as I copied the name straight from the page history of Rehoboth Human capital and training consultants. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 21:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

csd

Poppyuk is new, and not aware of the rules. I think it would be better to politely point out on the talk page what belongs in the user page, instead of going the CSD route.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 12:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Düringer

Please stop adding deletion tags to this article and please stop controlling my contributions. If you continue, adding deletion tags to worked out articles, I will report you for vandalism and you will get blocked from editing the Wikipedia. So please stop! M0RG@N (talk) 22:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read what the text in the proposed deletion box says. That explains why I tagged the article. Also, threatening to report people who do something you don't like is likely to get you reported. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 22:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is exisiting since January 2012. I see no reason why you added a deletion tag. Just because you won't aggree with that article doesn't mean that this article should get removed. It's a well worked out article and I'm totally satisfied with it. So please stop doing so! M0RG@N (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added the proposed deletion because the article doesn't conform to Wikipedia's rules on biographies of living persons. The reason for doing so is explained in the proposed deletion box on the article. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the article doesn't conform to Wikipedia's rules so why does it exist since january 2012 then?! Are you absolutely blind or what?! Just stop adding the deletion tag! M0RG@N (talk) 11:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's so many pages added to Wikipedia every minute that one or two will slip through. It doesn't mean that it should be allowed to stay just because no one noticed it. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 11:19, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reported you! And that no one noticed this article is also a nonsense. Let's see what the admins will tell about your behavior. You've also started edit warring with your behaviour, constantly adding the deletion tag. I'm totally fed up with you! M0RG@N (talk) 11:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You fell under the edit warring rules before I did due to your continued removal of the proposed deletion. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, you fell under it because you constantly tried to add the deletion tag and those have been reverted many times. M0RG@N (talk) 13:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI for Morgan Katarn

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I have started an ANI discussion regarding Morgan and his disruptive behavior. You have spent a signficant amount of time dealing with him, so your thoughts would be welcome. Some guy (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your CSD tagging

Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. -- Luke (Talk) 23:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]