User talk:Ttjohn

Welcome!

Hello, Ttjohn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Your article on Puthuppally was excellent work for a newcomer. Well done. I've amended it very slightly, so as to more closely meet our formatting standards - have a look. DS 14:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Vettom Mani"

A page you created, Vettom Mani, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. – Jerry^teps 06:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vettom Mani

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vettom Mani, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability, possible self promotion

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ariconte (talk) 10:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to St. George's Church, Puthuppally, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: St. George's Church, Puthuppally was changed by Ttjohn (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-04-17T08:37:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to St. George's Church, Puthuppally constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 08:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should keep the St. George page, as that's what the church was reconsecrated as centuries ago and how the website that you linked to displays its name. I think the Puthuppally page should either be removed or expanded to a page on that area around the church. Banaticus (talk) 09:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of St. Thomas Orthodox Church Vellukutta

I have nominated St. Thomas Orthodox Church Vellukutta, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Thomas Orthodox Church Vellukutta. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 15:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ttjohn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 331 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Vettam Mani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Indian Orthodox Church

Template:Infobox Indian Orthodox Church has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kaldari (talk) 08:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vellukutta.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vellukutta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]