User talk:Turkfromturkey

March 2020

Hello, I'm JavaHurricane. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Felicity Party—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Java Hurricane 12:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think AKP is moderate Islamic than Islamist? Helal no! Their members just screamsInfidel! Turkfromturkey (talk) 09:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Turkfromturkey, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Turkfromturkey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Welfare Party (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Welfare Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:New Welfare Party, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Welfare Party (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Welfare Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:New Welfare Party, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I almost used every sources there are almost no more sources. You can delete information without reliable sources but atleast there should be basic information about this political Party in Wikipedia İ think. You can delete some information without source. Turkfromturkey (talk) 09:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Welfare Party (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MrClog was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You cannot use Wikipedia, Facebook or Twitter as sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Welfare Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:New Welfare Party, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MrClog (talk) 09:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to National Bolshevik Party. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. MrClog (talk) 09:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. YouTube is generally not a reliable source MrClog (talk) 09:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube not reliable you say, but that was party's leader's speech. And I think facts that everyone knows don't needs source. Turkfromturkey (talk) 09:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at People's Alliance (Turkey) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrClog (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not doing An edit war or something like this. That's what are you doing you Just continue deleting. Adding is wrong but deleting is right? Nice logic.Everything You are sayin is same for deleting too. That's Just childish. Turkfromturkey (talk) 13:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have reverted you only once in the last 24 hours. Originally, I reverted your edit as part of recent changes partol. When you reinstated them, I reverted you today and engaged in a talk page discussion with you. You then, while the discussion is ongoing, choose to revert me instead of first establishing consensus for your change as you're supposed to do. I respectfully request that you self-revert your addition until you've established consensus regarding your edit. --MrClog (talk) 13:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, let's continue the discussion at Talk:People's Alliance (Turkey). --MrClog (talk) 13:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can discuss instead of adding them if you don't immediately delete them. Turkfromturkey (talk) 13:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Random deleting in Wikipedia (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Random deleting in Wikipedia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Random deleting in Wikipedia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Random deleting in Wikipedia

Draft:Random deleting in Wikipedia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Random deleting in Wikipedia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Random deleting in Wikipedia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Java Hurricane 15:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Turkfromturkey, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MrClog (talk) 17:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did I sockpuppet? Turkfromturkey (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Turkfromturkey. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 17:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did I sockpuppet? Turkfromturkey (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Checkuser has confirmed that your account and Bästa svenske killen are technically indistinguishable, so yes, you did sockpuppet (as you already knew, of course). --MrClog (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. I swear to God! Didn't you read my last apologise on your talk page? If you dont, basically I said you are right, and I accepted you know Wikipedia than me (how it works, rules...) But no problem for block because I already stopped editing. I just added Islamism to ideology of newspaper Yeni Akit yesterday. Please undo your edit about that because it is really islamist thats not Like ak Party. However if you dont still no problem because I Love you my friend! Turkfromturkey (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

However I already stopped editing and honestly I dont care about a damn newspaper so if you dont wanna you can not do this. You can do whatever you want my friend I already said you know Wikipedia better. However, I gotta go it was nice to meet you despite misunderstandings. And again I am not that stubborn I didn't sockpupetry but I dont care for block as I said I already stopped editing. However goodbye my friend. Turkfromturkey (talk) 14:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think checkuser didn't examine well however why Im still talking I already said goodbye and I already said Im not editing so I dont care about block. Goodbye kind sir. Turkfromturkey (talk) 14:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just admit you used more than one account already and state what you plan to do going forward. Administrators have heard a ton of "I didn't do it" excuses, and blaming your WP:BROTHER or another wont fly either. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Welfare Party (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MrClog were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Welfare Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:New Welfare Party, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MrClog (talk) 20:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:New Welfare Party

Draft:New Welfare Party, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:New Welfare Party and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:New Welfare Party during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 22:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]