Jump to content

User talk:User18762

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Svitlana Biedarieva (August 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Majority of sources are articles written by her, which do not count towards notability because they are not independent. Significant coverage by reliable, independent sources are needed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 18:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with this decision. The sources listed are reliable, peer reviewed third-party sources which are independent and reliable. This includes Art Margins published by MIT Press, October journal (also MIT Press) which is of the most respected international journals in art history, Space and Culture journal published by SAGE, Financial Times, and the Burlington Journal, among others. Additionally, there are pages on the Woodrow Wilson International Center and CEC ArtsLink Residency in New York where her profiles are listed. All these are independent sources. The only source directly linked to her is the personal website. User18762 (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have resubmitted, adding several third-party indepndent sources. Please review User18762 (talk) 20:14, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you choose ~5 refs that you think demonstrate her notability the best? Keep in mind that the sources should be independent, reliable and provide significant coverage. Since she is also an artist, you can also choose to demonstrate her notability under WP:NARTIST. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 20:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The source analysis I performed for your first submission:
Refs 1-9: By her, so aren't independent
Refs 10-11: Her website, so not independent.
Refs 11-15: Profiles of her ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 20:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added several sources, please check User18762 (talk) 20:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see my other reply above. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 20:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Refs 21, 18, 17, 13, 14, 15. 16, 10, 23, 24, 1 User18762 (talk) 20:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 21: Discusses her work more than her, but count towards Criteria#3 at WP:NARTIST so looks fine.
Ref 18: An interview, so doesn't count as not independent.
Ref 17: Partly by her, so doesn't count as not independent.
Refs 13 and 14: If you can prove the exhibition was significant/important, it satisfies crit#4 at WP:NARTIST. Otherwise, looks to be WP:ROUTINE coverage of an event.
Refs 15 and 16: By her or interview with her, so doesn't count as not independent.
Ref 24: She's mentioned once (checked using ctrl+f), so doesn't count as no significant coverage.
Ref 25: Once again, not really about her, about the exhibition so no significant coverage.
Ref 10: My translator doesn't work on downloaded pdfs, but seems to be similar to the previous exhibition coverage, so see above.
Overall, only refs 21 and the exhibition coverage may count. For the exhibition coverage, you need to demonstrate that her work has "been a substantial part of a significant exhibition." Doesn't currently seem to meet WP:NBIO, but I'll let a different reviewer review it again.
PS. the reason I asked for around 5 refs was because it makes it easier for us. Next time, please only provide the number of refs asked. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 21:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I added one more in the styke of ref 21. - ref 23 User18762 (talk) 21:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the criteria 3: The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series);
Book reviews: 1,2, 32
Reviews of the exhibitions that she curated: 24,25,19
Coverage of her artistic work: 10,11, 13,14, User18762 (talk) 21:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Leave this as a comment on the draft. I'm letting a different reviewer review this. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 21:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I have found two references more, so the reference numbers that I mentioned in my previous message goes +2 after ref 14 User18762 (talk) 22:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, User18762! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 18:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Svitlana Biedarieva has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Svitlana Biedarieva. Thanks! ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 17:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment. The license on the source website has beeen updated to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 User18762 (talk) 20:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, CC-BY-SA 4.0 User18762 (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So what is your association with this person, since you got her to change her copyright(which is still incompatible)? 331dot (talk) 21:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Images are not relevant to the draft approval process anyway; I would just wait and sort out the images later. 331dot (talk) 21:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
i simply emailed to the contact page of the website User18762 (talk) 21:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are you otherwise in communication with her about your efforts? 331dot (talk) 22:14, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
no. my aim is to make an account of people who work with curatorial practice and art in ukraine. this is the first trial article User18762 (talk) 22:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My cuts and moving content done with intent to improve chance a reviewer will approve. Your ref cuts also a good idea. In the end, her career may not be sufficiently advanced to merit an article (see WP:TOOSOON). Being an editor of books is less valuable than being a sole author. David notMD (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with references! I appreciate it. This is very useful to learn the correct format!
There are generally very few books published in her field, so can be still valuable (or qualify as WP:NARTIST, as the reviewer mentioned). User18762 (talk) 22:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, User18762, and welcome to Women in Red. I see from your comments above that you are keen to cover women artists and art curators in Ukraine. This should certainly help us along with our efforts to chip away at the gender gap on Wikipedia. Further to the excellent advice you have already received from other editors in connection with your first attempt at writing a biography, you will find some useful guidance in our essays, summarized in our Ten Simple Rules. Rather than including a long list of references, it is usually better to look first for three really good independent sources which provide detailed information on the subject. Once a short article has been accepted on this basis, in collaboration with contributions from other editors it can be expanded further. Why not try to rewrite your draft of Svitlana Biedarieva on this basis and let me know when you think it is ready for article space. We can then work together on bringing the draft up to acceptable standards. Please also let me know if you run into any other difficulties. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ipigott, thank you for the warm welcome and all the advice! Happy to join the group. I believe it is important to give visibility to women in arts, and particularly, to develop deeper knowldege about women in Ukrainian culture, which is not very well known globally. I will work on the references and the text further to shorten them, and then let you know! User18762 (talk) 23:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your improvements to Svitlana Biedarieva. I've moved it to mainspace. As she is an art historian and writer, I've tagged the talk page WIR-282 and included the article and the photo on our current focus page on women writers. Please let me know if you need any help with your next article. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott Thank you very much for the edits and the review of the article! I greatly appreciate your help. This is very encouraging, and I am very happy that this topic is of interest! I have begun gathering material for next two articles about Ukrainian women in art; so soon I will post more :) User18762 (talk) 00:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 07:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2023

[edit]
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - November 2023

[edit]
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red December 2023

[edit]
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red January 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red June 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
    Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:User18762&oldid=1254191765"