User talk:Vazeer os

Welcome!

Hello, Vazeer os, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 05:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dargah, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Jim1138 (talk) 05:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dargah. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dargah was changed by Vazeer os (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870227 on 2016-09-05T05:38:07+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Dargah. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 05:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't understand how to add a reference (see above), would you please not edit Wikipedia? Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dargah. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 09:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

log out option

Please enable log out option Vazeer os (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khwajah Abu; Abu Al Wafa Urf Khwajah Ibadullah Bin Shah Abdur'Rauf Bin Shah Wafa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khwajah Abu; Abu Al Wafa Urf Khwajah Ibadullah Bin Shah Abdur'Rauf Bin Shah Wafa, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. thayts 💬 16:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit that you recently made to List of Sufi saints seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits again

I undid more of your edits as they look bad, have all sorts of extraneous characters, and don't make much sense. They do not conform to wp:policy nor wp:Manual of Style. You should be more brief in your talk. Most don't want to read a wp:WALLOFTEXT such as you added to my talk page. I don't see http://www.nawraskings.life/ as being a wp:reliable source I would suggest you read Help:Editing, wp:Welcome, and/or wp:The Wikipedia Adventure about how to edit articles. The welcome section above contains this information. Your current editing style is not working. Jim1138 (talk) 05:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Please stop adding http://www.nawraskings.life to articles. Mz7 (talk) 07:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wali, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 07:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Khwajah Abu Abu Al Wafa Urf Khwajah Ibadullah Bin Shah Abdur Rauf Bin Shah Wafa Urf Hazrath Sayyid Ghalib Shaheed (RA) ==

Hello Vazeer os,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Khwajah Abu Abu Al Wafa Urf Khwajah Ibadullah Bin Shah Abdur Rauf Bin Shah Wafa Urf Hazrath Sayyid Ghalib Shaheed (RA)an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can Sayyid Ghalib Shaheed (RA).

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 12:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The article is not promotional, hyperlink only as some reference, in case some one feeling promotional, hyperlinks will not be linked, it is actual work, please enable the same of my past work. Thanking you

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazrath Sayyid Ghalib Shaheed (RA)

Hello Vazeer os,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hazrath Sayyid Ghalib Shaheed (RA) for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Refactoring other's talk

Changing other's talk (refactoring) as you did on your talk page here in this manner is considered bad practice at best. See WP:TPO Jim1138 (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]