User talk:VirtualRash

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Koit, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Koit was changed by VirtualRash (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954732 on 2012-07-26T04:13:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 04:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Moonbase Alpha (video game) was changed by VirtualRash (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905616 on 2012-09-04T00:26:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fifty Thousand Shades of Grey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fifty Thousand Shades of Grey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Toa Nidhiki05 00:06, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 4chan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thebestofall007 (talk) 02:40, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Cuteyiffyfox.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cuteyiffyfox.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Say It Isn't So.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Say It Isn't So.ogg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Snidely Whiplash

Unfortunately, your image substitution has been considered to be unconstructive for over 5 years -- see Talk:Snidely Whiplash#Please don't use File:Villainc.svg as a portrait of Snidely... AnonMoos (talk) 04:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Snidely Whiplash, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

June 2013

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Snidely Whiplash that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Кукурузные палочки.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Кукурузные палочки.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Asiana Airlines, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raggs, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JetBlast (talk) 21:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mudflap girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perdue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm AsceticRose. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Combarbalá have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. AsceticRosé 17:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Acabashi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Salat because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Acabashi (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Snidely Whiplash yet again

"Villainc" is simply not a specific portrait of Snidely, as has already been gone over several times... AnonMoos (talk) 03:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I modified the photo to look like Snidely.VirtualRash (talk) 11:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You gave it green skin, but it's still basically a generic depiction of a stock melodrama villain character, and not a specific portrait of Snidely Whiplash. AnonMoos (talk) 22:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm DemocraticLuntz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Antonio Stradivari because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 03:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Jong-il. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Nick Levine (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Jong-il, you may be blocked from editing. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kim Jong-il, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:03, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Jong-il with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]