User talk:VishGopi

March 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hiphop Tamizha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. We are not against you being his fan. But please stop writing in the article that you are his fan. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International Tamizhan is dropped

As Adhi has said in this interview: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/music/adhi-hip-hops-into-a-revolution-with-maanavan/articleshow/65440306.cms. So please don't re-add it. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Sorry bro! I didn't get that. It's a bad news. Anyway thank you for the information bro! VishGopi (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hiphop Tamizha discography

Hello VishGopi,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Cwmhiraeth and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Hiphop Tamizha discography for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Hiphop Tamizha.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:VishGopi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:VishGopi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 10:11, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanjith Hegde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vijay Kumar (Eruma Saani)

The article Vijay Kumar (Eruma Saani) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JamesG5 (talk) 08:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of VishGopi

Hello VishGopi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged VishGopi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GMG ^talk 16:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vijay Kumar (Eruma Saani) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijay Kumar (Eruma Saani) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Kumar (Eruma Saani) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 02:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, VishGopi, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

VishGopi, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VishGopi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VishGopi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I used multiple accounts. I don't know how to put permission for images. So only I used two account. I don't know that using multiple accounts is an violating one. I accept my mistake and I apologise. Hereby I will not use my second account. So please unblock my account User:VishGopi. If I do this continuesly, then you block me permanently. VishGopi (talk) 17:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. MER-C 14:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VishGopi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Bbb23, I'm sorry for that I used two accounts. I accept my mistake and I apologise. I edited many useful contents and also I deleted some fake informations. Here after I will not use two accounts. If you notice anything that I'm using two accounts, then you block me permanently. So please unblock my account User:VishGopi. VishGopi (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Let's say that you have addressed sockpuppetry satisfactorily. But I see two more grounds that you need to address: (1) writing about yourself and (2) reposting deleted content. I'd like to see an explanation in your own words why the first is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. MER-C 14:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MER-C, I'm VishGopi. I created Wikipedia account before 3 years. In starting time I don't know to edit, and so I didn't you Wikipedia for more days. After that only I came to know how to use Wikipedia. I have edited many contents in many articles. I also deleted the wrong contents that I seen. And also created some articles. But now I'm blocked indefinitely. If you review my request and unblock me, I will very thankful for you and I will do many good edits and so. Here after I will not violate Wikipedia.VishGopi VishGopi (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VishGopi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I used two Wikipedia user accounts in a same IP address. Until you block me, I don't know that it was a violate one Wikipedia. Hereafter I will use only one account in Wikipedia which is User:VishGopi. And I will not violate Wikipedia in any cost. So please accept my request and unblock me. Previous I edited my name in Wikipedia, and I got a warning. That after I didn't do such an edits. Likewise hereafter I won't use multiple accounts or any other violating things. So please unblock me.

Decline reason:

You have so far refused to answer MER-C's question, "I'd like to see an explanation in your own words why the first is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia". Additionally, you have demonstrated your grasp of English is not sufficient to edit the English Wikipedia. I'm meaning no offense; I don't understand any other language sufficiently to edit in another language. Yamla (talk) 11:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VishGopi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The things which are against the Wikipedia's conditions should be prohibited. Administrators and other users are preventing the violations and vandalism. Without knowing some conditions, I did some violating edits. Now I know about that. Hereby I won't do any violation or vandalism. I will against the vandalism. Accept my request of unblock. I edit only fair content. Thank you

Decline reason:

We need you to be a lot more specific. What exactly were your "violating edits" and what did they violate? only (talk) 10:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you now have four failed unblock requests demonstrating you do not understand or have the ability to write English sufficiently well to participate in this project, I have revoked talk page access. en.wiki isn't for you; I suggest contributing in the native language version of Wikipedia, if one exists. --Yamla (talk) 10:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Proposed deletion of Aalambana

The article Aalambana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence film has entered main production, per WP:NFF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 21:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]