Jump to content

User talk:Wikigeek2011

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Galway-Jackson was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant talk 16:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ankit MaityTalkContribs 06:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Wikigeek2011, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. Any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rcsprinter (rap) @ 17:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Wikigeek2011. You have new messages at Rcsprinter123's talk page.
Message added 17:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Rcsprinter (articulate) @ 17:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Galway-Jackson concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Galway-Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ultraliberal

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ultraliberal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ging287 (talk) 15:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ultraliberal may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Judaism]] emanating from the mainly ex-Christian conversion group but also others in LJ an d {Reform Judaism]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
nonsense ferret 16:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Galway-Jackson concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Galway-Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Galway-Jackson

[edit]

Hello Wikigeek2011. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Jonathan Galway-Jackson".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Galway-Jackson}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. C679 07:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Nouvelles for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Nouvelles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nouvelles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CatCrofts (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Troubles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 17:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also the Ulster Defence Association article, as well as other Troubles related articles, is under a 1-revert-restriction, meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24 hour period. FDW777 (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 21:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Correection Hi - one will address each and every point and correct it with the required information in the best English possible (my second language).

There is problem that much of the national press they got has dropped from google due to google recycling old national press articles.

One is in charge of the Nouvelles wikipedia as one has been for 10 years writing about them for the France public. They have finished the album and I want to add due to covid why this has as most indie bands signed to Britains indie labels not been released.

Wikigeek

January 2021

[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
EvergreenFir (talk) 23:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikigeek2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is currently a wiki-bullying attack on this band in breach of The Coronavirus Act which has caused bands in England to stop performance and recording, the in-house team are duly spending time updating online presence and dealing with journalists for their album release after lockdown is lifted. No-one is currently paid to promote this band everything is in-house under the group's label. This errs in England and Wales law and Wiki regulations worldwide. Please unblock immediately and stop this bullying, harassment and discrimination against this band. Thanks Wikigeek2011 (talk) 20:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 20:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikigeek2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No one is being paid. One came on this week to help wiki by removing dead links.I do not understand why you are bullying me and stopping me do what I have done on wiki for a decade with no problems, and there are none now which are not in resolution, the site usually fix is being attacked when I have merely been trying to help. Wikigeek2011 (talk) 20:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC) I have helped a music group and others free of charge on wiki for a decade. I came on this week due to Covid lockdown to help wiki by what I thought they wanted - deleting dead links etc. This was then all removed and nothing explained to me as to why, when all I was doing was helping. I sought to help wiki nothing else, certainly not harm it. Wikigeek2011 (talk) 20:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have not explained who "we" is or responded to the claim that this account seems to be for a group. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have read and understand the Terms and Conditions. I will make useful contributions. I am not being paid to maintain this music groups page. I have no coi in the group. I have no intention to disrupt wikipedia. Please unblock my account.

Un-block

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikigeek2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing in my second language. I have been a wiki writor for 10 years for this band as they have a name that is in our language and many people follow them here.

I often mistake We for one (in my language we write one meaning I).

There is only me / one.

I understand the Term and Conditions and there is no conflit of interest.

I am and never have been paid.

I was trying to remove dead links.

There is a member of NOUVELLES who is very polticial and they are being attacked by a editior who would be a political opponent

I am trying help as the arbitration is closed, and the band have got a lawyer to take the defamation to court.

I was trying to update a page to say that covid had postponsed release of the album.

I do not intend to do more than address concerns - the band is being called to names like they are not which is defamtaion.

They have went from 2008 full page NME to the last gig before covid at Kendal Calling instead of playing BBC at Glastonbury.

I now have all evidence to prove that the IRA editors attacks are false and I have the right under Terms and Conditions to not be blocked and update the page.

After that, it there is problems, then we can take from there. It is best the political opponent editor is left out of putting the page one has worked on for 10 years up to now when the album of the NOUVELLES is going to HMV and other shops, as it is a political attack on one member of the NOUVELLES.

I think all this is fair and clear, as I was trying to be by cleaning up the page.

I have everything here on hard copy and digil gathering to prove the spurious defamation case which no-one wants to take but it is going to be put in court by the bands lawyers if things like "the nouvells are pub band" are not removed - the whole world knows they never have been that and it must be a mistake or misunderstanging eg small newspapers leaving their stories on google when other biggers ones remove or are removed by the algoritm.

I just want to make the page corrent and tidy under the Terms and Conditions.

Band sold 100 000 records and downloads - can not be a pub band. They sell 10 tshirts a week on fb and cds from their label as well and elesewhere eg ebay and indie record shops biggest in UK.

There has been a big mistake due to obvious hate or poltiical hate and all one is trying to do is prevent needless laweyer and other actions due to no arbitration which is breaking Terms and Conditions I signed up to in 2011.

I have not been paid, not broken rules and do intend to do what I was doing stating the facts with references.


Wikigeek2011

Wikigeek2011 (talk) 21:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm going to use what you just said here to decline this unblock request "I am trying to help E/F by advising s/he will be in court to defend this" This is a clear, and beyond ANY shadow of a doubt a legal threat to take a Wikipedia editor to court. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you state for the record whether you have any connection to the band or its members other than being a fan? FDW777 (talk) 10:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence available to prove both points errrors

[edit]

Evergreen Fri has accused an office of being paid to host this page.

There is one person me who has done this free of charge for 10 years.

It is best that it would be impossible to prove otherwise, there fore the 2 reasons to exclude me are cyberbullying, harassment due to 2nd attempt, and spurious.

I am trying to help E/F by advising s/he will be in court to defend this and there is absolutely no payments over 10 years not an office either.

I have worked solidly within the terms and conditions and only me unpaid intended to do so.

I have no coi du tout.

The band label have paid a lawyer and I think this is silly, as there is such zero possible evidience to prove otherwise.

I am a neutral volunteer who came on to clean up the page.

I am honestly trying to help Evergreen - s/he has beleievd a false narrative by those who have always tried to censor the page due to political reasons not Evergreen but others.


Wikigeek


wikigeek

ANI, again

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

[edit]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Per WP:NLT, you are not permitted to pursue (or even announce the advent of) any legal remedies on Wikipedia proper. Until any and all pertinent legal matters are resolved, it is inappropriate for you to employ Wikipedia, the website, toward that end, really, in any way whatsoever (with the exception of categorically rescinding said legal action). El_C 16:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikigeek2011&oldid=1142690022"