- 1 Speedy deletion contested: Geetha junior college
- 2 Talkback
- 3 ZSpeed, you are invited to the Teahouse
- 4 Category:Iran Locations
- 5 Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
- 6 Mocktail
- 7 Note
- 8 Category:Solitary Animals
- 9 Talkback
- 10 Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
- 11 Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world
- 12 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 13 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 14 Nomination of List of solitary animals for deletion
Speedy deletion contested: Geetha junior college
Hello ZSpeed, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Geetha junior college, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Electric Catfish 20:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I changed it to a PROD, or a proposed deletion. Best, Electric Catfish 20:58, 31 July 2012 (UTC).
—David Levy 21:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
ZSpeed, you are invited to the Teahouse
Category:Iran Locations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 18:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Hi, ZSpeed, thank you for tagging the above article for speedy deletion. However, you didn't specify a reason why it qualified. Your edit summary was 'I think this page is spam'. The article would normally be classed as a hoax, but in this case it was a vandalised redirect to Non-alcoholic beverage. I've restored the pre-vandalism version. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:08, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Category:Solitary Animals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BabelStone (talk) 00:15, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world
Why you want this page to be deleted? Can you quote any guidline or policy from Wikipedia?
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Nomination of List of solitary animals for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of solitary animals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of solitary animals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MiguelMadeira (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)