Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/2011 log

Kept

Slipknot discography

Slipknot studio albums

10 articles

Slipknot

Iowa

Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses)

All Hope Is Gone

9.0: Live

Mate. Feed. Kill. Repeat.

Welcome to Our Neighborhood

Disasterpieces

Voliminal: Inside the Nine

(sic)nesses

Since the precedent now is to have studio albums-based topics, I propose removal of all the other albums until somebody pushes the latest video one through GAN. Nergaal (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Something has got to change, (sic)nesses' retention period of three months has past. This is a poor hack of a solution, but would be preferable over a full removal. Courcelles 03:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

• Comment Why can't it just be discography? It's still a topic. Just because Nirvana Studio Albums is a topic doesn't mean that all other discography topics must be consistent to it. That would be a bit odd… CrowzRSA 05:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure we have three options, 1)Reformulate it, possibly as proposed, 2)Work on and nominate (sic)nesses as a GA, 3)Delist the whole kit and caboodle. Courcelles 05:23, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I think can get (sic)nesses to GAN within this month. It should be on hold until a the article passes the nomination… CrowzRSA 17:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I can give you until month's end to get it nominated at GAN; we'll see where it goes from there. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Nominated. CrowzRSA 20:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

• Keep as (sic)nesses is now GA. CrowzRSA 23:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
• Suggest quick close as keep. Nergaal (talk) 01:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
• Comment BTW, several of these articles have dead links. At least Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses), All Hope Is Gone, Mate. Feed. Kill. Repeat., Welcome to Our Neighborhood and Voliminal: Inside the Nine. See the book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

• Closing as kept. I can assume good faith that the deadlinks will be handled in a timely manner. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Lists of World Wrestling Entertainment champions

Current World Wrestling Entertainment champions, Lists of

9 articles

WWE Champions

WWE Intercontinental Champions

World Tag Team Champions

WWE Women's Champions

World Heavyweight Champions

WWE United States Champions

WWE Tag Team Champions

WWE Divas Champions

I have placed this topic up for FTRC due to failing 3a, as List of WWE Divas Champions is not currently a Featured List. It had til the 19th and it is past it. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:37, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• Comment This whole topic needs to be updated. The Womens and World Tag Team titles are no longer active, and this topic is about current championships. Getting the Divas champions article to FL should be easy enough as its already in good condition. I can do it sometime later this week, unless someone wants to beat me to it. -- Scorpion0422 II (Talk) 21:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
  • O.k, so List of WWE Divas Champions is at FLC, that's a good start. Now, you mentioned that two of the championships are no longer active. Does that mean that they have to be removed from the topic? GamerPro64 (talk) 01:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Yes, it's been done a few times before as well. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 03:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Is this topic about current champions or overall? I ask since the current is taken out of the title; if it is, those two that are defunct will need to be removed. If it's overall, then there are many that need adding. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

The original definition was active championships, but the title was tweaked by various users until it omitted that vital bit. I assume that it is still the definition. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 03:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay; I tweaked the above to reflect, though it will mean taking off a couple of the topics. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

The defunct titles FL should be updated then. Nergaal (talk) 06:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I'll close this as keep sans the two articles when the FLC is promoted, which I'm actually surprised it hasn't been yet. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

I think it got promoted. Nergaal (talk) 18:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

• It offical that it got promoted. I updated the topic:

Current World Wrestling Entertainment champions, Lists of

7 articles

WWE Champions

WWE Intercontinental Champions

World Heavyweight Champions

WWE United States Champions

WWE Tag Team Champions

WWE Divas Champions

GamerPro64 (talk) 02:21, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

• Closed as kept, with the two defunct belts removed. Thanks for updating the topic. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Demoted

Video games developed by Key

Video games developed by Key

9 articles

Kanon

Air

Clannad

Planetarian: Chiisana Hoshi no Yume

Tomoyo After: It's a Wonderful Life

Little Busters!

Kud Wafter

Rewrite

I am placing this up for GTRC as the retention period for Rewrite has expired for more than a month. GamerPro64 17:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

I'll check with the writer of Rewrite, as on the surface it looks like it could pass GAN. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:29, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

The plot and characters sections have to be filled out, and that's basically the only thing keeping me from nominating it. It's sort of been on the backburner for a while, so that's why it's taking so long.--十八 01:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

I went ahead and put it up for GAN, since while things need to be fleshed out, now's your chance to do that. I'll close this based on the outcome of that. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 22:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

The GA nomination was closed as not successful. All that can be done at this time has been done at this time. On the plus side, 18 at least has this on the radar, so the chances for re-promotion are higher for this than for most. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

• Closed, topic delisted. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Seasons of 30 Rock

Seasons of 30 Rock

6 articles

Season 1 ^(subtopic)

Season 2 ^(subtopic)

Season 3 ^(subtopic)

Season 4 ^(subtopic)

Season 5

I am placing this up for FTRC as 30 Rock (season 5) is not up to standards and its retention has been expired for two months. GamerPro64 00:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

I'll close and demote this this weekend unless someone comes out of nowhere to fix it and push it to FLC, which I don't see happening. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

• Closed, topic delisted. Despite no further comments the result is clear. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Lists of World Wrestling Entertainment champions

World Wrestling Entertainment champions, Lists of

7 articles

WWE Champions

WWE United States Champions

World Heavyweight Champions

WWE Intercontinental Champions

WWE Tag Team Champions

WWE Divas Champions

I am placing this topic up for FTRC (once again) for its failure of 3.a, as the main article, List of current champions in World Wrestling Entertainment, was demoted from FL status in April and failed to reclaim the status three months later. GamerPro64 16:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

• Delist as time is up. Bencherlite^Talk 09:34, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

• Closed with consensus to demote. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:28, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Rock Steady

Rock Steady

6 articles

"Hey Baby"

"Hella Good"

"Underneath It All"

"Running"

Rock Steady Live

Does not include Rock Steady Tour and therefore fails 1d. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

• Delist – Doesn't look like Rock Steady Tour can be GA-ready in the near future. EA Artist is notified I hope. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Dammit, I knew I had forgotten something! Notifyfing now. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

• Delist as well. Crystal Clear x3 03:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

• Closed with consensus to delist. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Star Wars: Jedi Knight titles

Star Wars: Jedi Knight titles

6 articles

Star Wars: Dark Forces

Star Wars Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II

Star Wars Jedi Knight: Mysteries of the Sith

Star Wars Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast

Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy

I am nominating this topic for GTRC for its 3.a failure as Star Wars Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast was delisted from GA status and didn't obtain the status back three months later. GamerPro64 18:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

• Delist Per Talk:Star Wars Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast#Good Article reassessment the individual who worked to bring the game to GA status stated they don't have time to do so, and no one else has stepped up. --Teancum (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
• Comment I might try and improve Jedi Outcast, but I can't promise anything. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 08:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
• Delist for now, that is. When Star Wars Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast gets re-promoted to GA status again, then you can renominate the entire topic again. —Terrence and Phillip 05:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
• Delist Unless Jedit Outcast is pushed up to GA (although nothing's happened in the last month). Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

• Closed with consensus to delist. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:38, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

My World (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/My World for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. My World (EP)

My World

8 articles

"One Time"

"Favorite Girl"

"Bigger"

"One Less Lonely Girl"

"Love Me"

"First Dance"

"Down to Earth"

I am adding the supplementary nomination with the additions of the new GA's of the remaining album tracks, "Bigger", "First Dance", and "Down to Earth", to add these to this current good topic. Candyo32 14:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

• Why isn't My World Tour included? Nergaal (talk) 22:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

My World Tour is to support My World 2.0 era, not the EP. Candyo32 03:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

The tour supports both, trust me. The same thing happened to me with the Wonder World Tour. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:32, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Well considering the EP was sort of a precursor to 2.0, would it be safe to just include all the articles from both? Candyo32 00:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't know about that. Lady Gaga's The Fame is a good topic without The Fame Monster. And Ke$ha's Animal and Cannibal have the same separation. But the tour is for both for sure. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 06:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Don't bundle the two albums into one topic; there would be no lead article. I will support this topic if you clean up My World Tour (it's not too bad at the moment) and get it peer reviewed (WP:FT? #3c. The Tour will need to be GA/FA by 21 August (3 months after conclusion). Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I second his opinion for album merging. But I have to disagree and state that the tour is not is good or decent condition. It's missing a lot - A LOT. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

• Comment, BTW My World , "One Less Lonely Girl" and "Love Me" have some deadlinks. See book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

• The Tour article says it supports both albums, so I'm not seeing why it wouldn't be included. Either way, it should be peer reviewed to satisfy 3c. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 21:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

This needs a few more comments, I can't really close this one way or the other as is. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

• If the tour article were to be PRed soon, then this topic would have until August 20 for the tour to become a GA. Without a PR, I think this additional nom will become a FTRC instead soon. Nergaal (talk) 01:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

I'll give the tour article another 3 days to get to PR; if it doesn't I'll move this to an FTRC. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

The World Tour needs to be added in, and since it's not up to par, I'm moving this to the topic removal candidate section. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

The tour hasn't concluded yet, so it would be WP:RECENTISM, and the FT was already passed the first time before plans of a tour were even announced. Candyo32 20:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

• When does the tour end? GamerPro64 (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

• It can't be a GA yet, but that doesn't mean it should be ignored, since it will have to be added to the topic anyway, so might as well do it now. The tour end date has continued to change (a check last week had it as June 20, but i just checked and now it's July) Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

• Remove Unless the tour is cleaned up and sent to PR. Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delist; the tour article should at least be taken to peer review and fixed up as much as possible. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
• Delist unless the tour article gets peer-reviewed and added. Ucucha 10:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

• Closed with consensus to delist as GT. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Nine Inch Nails

Nine Inch Nails

7 articles

Band members

Trent Reznor

Concert tours

Live performances

Discography

Awards and nominations

Back in December, the Trent Reznor article was demoted from its GA status. 3 months later, there has been no act to bring it back to GA or higher. GamerPro64 (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Comment, Nine Inch Nails also has several deadlinks in the article. Live performances has at least one. See the book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delist as featured topic. There are a large number of problems, not just with Trent Reznor. In fact, I'd almost suggest that Nine Inch Nails itself be delisted as a FA. It has a ton of dead links, some of which have been broken for almost two years. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 17:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
  • The main article had nine dead links, I was able to fix five of then with 15 minutes work. I know nothing at all about this subject, but Reznor doesn't look impossible to fix. I'll give it a go rather than see an FT fall without a fight. Courcelles 18:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
    • Alright. I'll place the review on hold for the time being. GamerPro64 (talk) 18:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
      • Go ahead and delist this. It's so far out of my knowledge base I don't even know what I don't know... and that's making too much work for me when I have too much on my plate. I'll try to bring it back without time pressures if I can. Courcelles 09:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delist per the above. The issues with the article are too great to be fixed quickly. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
• Closed with consensus to demote from FT status. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Star Wars episodes

Star Wars episodes

7 articles

Episode I: The Phantom Menace

Episode II: Attack of the Clones

Episode III: Revenge of the Sith

Episode IV: A New Hope

Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back

Episode VI: Return of the Jedi

Two old FAs were demoted a while ago. The remaining GAs presumably need some work too. Nergaal (talk) 20:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

• Remove Unless someone wants to save this which I think is unlikely. Zginder 2011-01-20T21:32Z (UTC)
• Remove - Might as well. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
• Remove per above. JJ98 (Talk) 22:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

• Close with consensus to demote. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Celebration

Celebration (Madonna album)

4 articles

"Celebration"

"Revolver"

Celebration: The Video Collection

I believe the topic should include all the 10+ singles it covers. Only about half of them are GA/FA. Nergaal (talk) 21:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

• Delist as not comprehensive. --Admrboltz (talk) 22:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
• Keep It has all of its singles on the topic. It doesn't need anymore articles added to it. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
  • While it may have all the specific singles, why not all of the articles that are linked to under the track listing. They all have articles, thus should be part of this GT. --Admrboltz (talk) 02:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
    • I looked at all of the articles and I saw that Celebration and Revolver are exclusive to the album while the rest are from preivious albums (probably why its a greatest hits album). So, this topic is all complete. GamerPro64 (talk) 03:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
      • Articles can be part of multiple topics. The fact that an article is or would be in another topic does not mean that it should not be included if it is in the scope of the topic. Nergaal (talk) 04:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
      • Just to give a concrete example: helium is both a noble gas AND a group 1 element. Nergaal (talk) 04:32, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
• Delist A greatest hits album is about the hits! It does not make since to ignore most of the content of the topic. Zginder 2010-12-13T02:47Z (UTC)

• I would tend to be towards keep, as GamerPro64 pointed out, not all the songs present from the album are singles from it. And why the hell weren't hte wikiprojects or the primary contributers notified of this? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
• Keep Users not notified, and people who still beliving that compilation albums muat include all songs, EVEN if they are not released on that album. Tbh®tch^{Talk ©} Happy Holidays 05:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

• Comment This is poor process. At the moment there is a greatest hits GTC taking place. As this discussion involves a change in precedent, why not take the all hits/only singles discussion there. And the fact that no-one was notified is shocking. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Delist Despite this bad procedure, I would say that a greatest hits topic is incomplete without the hits. Adabow (talk · contribs) 22:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

• Keep - Ummm, not all of Madodnna's songs are singles from this greatest hits package. This nomination is absurd. It had two singles and a video. Keep Keep Keep.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 05:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
• Question for all those that vote keep: how does this topic pass criteria 1.d.:

There is no obvious gap (missing or stub article) in the topic. A topic must not cherry pick only the best articles to become featured together?

This topic is not titled "Singles from Celebration", so it should contain all the articles within the topic if they are notable enough to exist. Nergaal (talk) 05:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

As Tbhotch pointed out, they are not released as singles from this album, and have no point here. This nomination is fundamentally flawed. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Leaving asides the COI, is this an Overview topic? No. Then all the songs within its scope should be included per 1.d. The compilation sold not just because of the singles, but because of all the songs that were included. The singles reasoning sounds like saying that a TV season topic should only include the episodes that were heavily promoted, like those that were run right after the SuperBowl or around similar events, and exclude those that were not marketed in an unusual fashion. Nergaal (talk) 06:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

• Delist. This should not be considered a complete topic unless all of the songs on the album that are notable enough to have articles are at least GA status, not just the new songs on the album. A person reading this topic would want to learn about all of the songs on the album, not just the new ones. –Grondemar 07:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

• Keep I agree with the above statements that want this to remain a good topic--Blackjacks101 (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

• Delist. Singles are more 'important' to an album than the other songs, but that doesn't make other songs unimportant or irrelevant. —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 16:22, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Delist - I tend to agree with the above rationale, and the same should be applied for the Britney Spears one. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

• Close with consensus to delist. With this and the Spears one, looks like we have precedent now. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)