Jump to content

Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2021 April 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 6 << Mar | April | May >> April 8 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 7

[edit]

Viewing point maps

[edit]

There is a type of map displaying points where the points seem to be strangely embedded into the page. Hovering the points gives a small tooltip with the name of the point but this is impossible to see the different points when many of them are stacked into a small area.
Is it possible to get a larger version of or zoom in to these types of maps? Clicking the map just brings up the base map without the points and zooming in to the page through the browser does not affect the points.
I have seen these types of maps mainly on French Wikipedia though they likely exist on other versions too. How are these maps created and where is the point data coming from? Is it possible to pull up a zoom-able map with these points or to download them?
Here is a page that has two examples of the type of map I am talking about: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juiverie
Many thanks! Busmargali (talk) 06:11, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Busmargali: The page you linked is on the french Wikipedia, which is a seperate project. These maps are created by using a svg map of french and later generating the hover points with CSS, which makes then unable to be zoomed. However, here on the english Wikipedia we have a zoomable alternative based on OpenStreetMap, see Wikipedia:Maps_for_Wikipedia and {{Maplink}}. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to get my password if Email was wiped to my account, but I have proof of my account from a previous email before I switched emails

[edit]

The email is wiped without my intent (it was the email service itself) but I have a single wikipedia email from wikipedia sent to me about my account referring to it about whatever it is that I had to my account previously before. Is there a way I can contact an admin and just forward this wikipedia email from the active email as proof that this is indeed me and my account in order to revert my account to that active email?--2600:1700:4000:62E0:FD5F:D6A1:8447:13DB (talk) 06:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely not, i am afraid. If you no longer have access to the email account used on Wikipedia, you only can register a new account with a new username. The sole exception to this would be if the old account had Steward, Oversight or a similar high-profile user right. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you created a {{Committed identity}}, you may be able to use that. (If you didn't, it's now too late.) Certes (talk) 12:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User page with 252 categories

[edit]

I found a user page that has 252 categories:

Categories
  1. Category:Accommodationist Wikipedians
  2. Category:Apatheist Wikipedians
  3. Category:Categorist Wikipedians
  4. Category:Chinese Wikipedians
  5. Category:Darwikinist Wikipedians
  6. Category:Eventualist Wikipedians
  7. Category:Evolutionist Wikipedians
  8. Category:Existentialist Wikipedians
  9. Category:Hong Kong Wikipedians
  10. Category:Inclusionist Wikipedians
  11. Category:Incrementalist Wikipedians
  12. Category:Male Wikipedians
  13. Category:Mathematicist Wikipedians
  14. Category:Mesopedianist Wikipedians
  15. Category:Metapedianist Wikipedians
  16. Category:Neutralist Wikipedians
  17. Category:Pastafarian Wikipedians
  18. Category:Proofreaders zh-en
  19. Category:Rationalist Wikipedians
  20. Category:Redirectionist Wikipedians
  21. Category:Redlinking Wikipedians
  22. Category:Rouge editors
  23. Category:Separatist Wikipedians
  24. Category:Spheroidal Earther Wikipedians
  25. Category:Stoic Wikipedians
  26. Category:Structurist Wikipedians
  27. Category:Temporary maintenance holdings
  28. Category:Translators zh-en
  29. Category:Transwikist Wikipedians
  30. Category:User android programmer-1
  31. Category:User bash-1
  32. Category:User batch-3
  33. Category:User c-2User c++-2
  34. Category:User cmd-3
  35. Category:User c sharp-3
  36. Category:User css-2
  37. Category:User en-5
  38. Category:User groovy
  39. Category:User haskell-2
  40. Category:User html-2
  41. Category:User java-5
  42. Category:User js-3
  43. Category:User kotlin
  44. Category:User latexUser latex-1
  45. Category:User luaUser sql-1
  46. Category:User Markdown
  47. Category:User mw-4
  48. Category:User mysql-1
  49. Category:User pas-3
  50. Category:User python-2
  51. Category:User r-2User scala-2
  52. Category:User regex-3
  53. Category:User svgUser svg-3
  54. Category:User template coder-5
  55. Category:User TypeScript
  56. Category:User Wikitext-3
  57. Category:User Wikitext-5
  58. Category:User xhtml-3
  59. Category:User xml-4
  60. Category:User xsd
  61. Category:User zh-N
  62. Category:Wik# Category:Wikipedians who use RedWarn
  63. Category:Wikipedia AdventurersWikipedians with a sense of humor
  64. Category:Wikipedia AfC reviewers
  65. Category:Wikipedia autoconfirmed users
  66. Category:Wikipedia extended confirmed users
  67. Category:Wikipedia LibrariansWikipedians who have access to Al Manhal
  68. Category:Wikipedia new page reviewers
  69. Category:Wikipedian mathematicians
  70. Category:Wikipedian pianistsWikipedian pianists-3
  71. Category:Wikipedian recent changes patrollers
  72. Category:Wikipedians in an unfunny self-referential category
  73. Category:Wikipedians in a red category
  74. Category:Wikipedians in China
  75. Category:Wikipedians in Hong Kong
  76. Category:Wikipedians interested in algebra
  77. Category:Wikipedians interested in alternate history
  78. Category:Wikipedians interested in Antarctica
  79. Category:Wikipedians interested in art
  80. Category:Wikipedians interested in artificial intelligence
  81. Category:Wikipedians interested in asteroids
  82. Category:Wikipedians interested in astronomy
  83. Category:Wikipedians interested in biology
  84. Category:Wikipedians interested in China
  85. Category:Wikipedians interested in cognitive science
  86. Category:Wikipedians interested in Computer applications
  87. Category:Wikipedians interested in computer science
  88. Category:Wikipedians interested in conlanging or conworlding
  89. Category:Wikipedians interested in conspiracy theories
  90. Category:Wikipedians interested in data science
  91. Category:Wikipedians interested in data visualization
  92. Category:Wikipedians interested in democracy
  93. Category:Wikipedians interested in diplomacy
  94. Category:Wikipedians interested in economics
  95. Category:Wikipedians interested in energy
  96. Category:Wikipedians interested in environmentalism
  97. Category:Wikipedians interested in environmental protection
  98. Category:Wikipedians interested in etymology
  99. Category:Wikipedians interested in Europe
  100. Category:Wikipedians interested in free software
  101. Category:Wikipedians interested in future studies
  102. Category:Wikipedians interested in game theory
  103. Category:Wikipedians interested in general relativity
  104. Category:Wikipedians interested in geometry
  105. Category:Wikipedians interested in geopolitics
  106. Category:Wikipedians interested in green energy
  107. Category:Wikipedians interested in health and hygiene
  108. Category:Wikipedians interested in history
  109. Category:Wikipedians interested in Hong Kong
  110. Category:Wikipedians interested in human rights
  111. Category:Wikipedians interested in integral or transpersonal thought
  112. Category:Wikipedians interested in intellectual property
  113. Category:Wikipedians interested in Internet
  114. Category:Wikipedians interested in internet security
  115. Category:Wikipedians interested in intersectionality
  116. Category:Wikipedians interested in large numbers
  117. Category:Wikipedians interested in law and morality
  118. Category:Wikipedians interested in linguistics
  119. Category:Wikipedians interested in literature
  120. Category:Wikipedians interested in logicWikipedians interested in numbers
  121. Category:Wikipedians interested in mathematics
  122. Category:Wikipedians interested in metaphysics
  123. Category:Wikipedians interested in nature
  124. Category:Wikipedians interested in news sources
  125. Category:Wikipedians interested in onomastics
  126. Category:Wikipedians interested in open access
  127. Category:Wikipedians interested in philosophy
  128. Category:Wikipedians interested in physics
  129. Category:Wikipedians interested in pi
  130. Category:Wikipedians interested in political science
  131. Category:Wikipedians interested in politics
  132. Category:Wikipedians interested in probability
  133. Category:Wikipedians interested in psychology
  134. Category:Wikipedians interested in puzzles
  135. Category:Wikipedians interested in quantum field theory
  136. Category:Wikipedians interested in quantum physics
  137. Category:Wikipedians interested in recycling
  138. Category:Wikipedians interested in relativity
  139. Category:Wikipedians interested in religion
  140. Category:Wikipedians interested in science
  141. Category:Wikipedians interested in secularism
  142. Category:Wikipedians interested in social ethics
  143. Category:Wikipedians interested in social sciences
  144. Category:Wikipedians interested in sociology
  145. Category:Wikipedians interested in Solar System
  146. Category:Wikipedians interested in spaceflight
  147. Category:Wikipedians interested in space science
  148. Category:Wikipedians interested in statistics
  149. Category:Wikipedians interested in string theory
  150. Category:Wikipedians interested in surrealism
  151. Category:Wikipedians interested in technology
  152. Category:Wikipedians interested in the Americas
  153. Category:Wikipedians interested in the Arctic
  154. Category:Wikipedians interested in the Earth
  155. Category:Wikipedians interested in the English language
  156. Category:Wikipedians interested in the environment
  157. Category:Wikipedians interested in the philosophy of physics
  158. Category:Wikipedians interested in thermodynamics
  159. Category:Wikipedians interested in transhumanism
  160. Category:Wikipedians interested in trigonometry
  161. Category:Wikipedians interested in video game development
  162. Category:Wikipedians interested in video games
  163. Category:Wikipedians interested in voting methods
  164. Category:Wikipedians in the Counter-Vandalism Unit
  165. Category:Wikipedians in the Welcoming Committee
  166. Category:Wikipedians of Earth
  167. Category:Wikipedians on the Typo Team
  168. Category:Wikipedians requesting help improving their user pages
  169. Category:Wikipedians under investigation by the Categories Police
  170. Category:Wikipedians who are definitely not socks
  171. Category:Wikipedians who are members of categories listed on Special:WantedCategories
  172. Category:Wikipedians who are too sarcastic for their own good and who no one takes seriously or takes too seriously
  173. Category:Wikipedians who cannot be trout-slapped because they are already fish
  174. Category:Wikipedians who contribute to Wikidata
  175. Category:Wikipedians who contribute to Wikimedia Commons
  176. Category:Wikipedians who convert raster images to scalable vector graphics
  177. Category:Wikipedians who edit audio files
  178. Category:Wikipedians who edit by smartphone
  179. Category:Wikipedians who enjoy life
  180. Category:Wikipedians who have access to Annual Reviews
  181. Category:Wikipedians who have access to Cairn
  182. Category:Wikipedians who have access to CEEOL
  183. Category:Wikipedians who have access to EBSCO
  184. Category:Wikipedians who have access to Edinburgh University Press
  185. Category:Wikipedians who have access to Foreign Affairs
  186. Category:Wikipedians who have access to Gale
  187. Category:Wikipedians who have access to HeinOnline
  188. Category:Wikipedians who have access to JSTOR
  189. Category:Wikipedians who have access to OpenEdition
  190. Category:Wikipedians who have access to Oxford University Press
  191. Category:Wikipedians who have access to Women Writers Online
  192. Category:Wikipedians who have access to World Bank
  193. Category:Wikipedians who have had the appearance of their user page modified against their will
  194. Category:Wikipedians who like Minecraft
  195. Category:Wikipedians who listen to music
  196. Category:Wikipedians who listen to video game music
  197. Category:Wikipedians who participate in the Feedback Request Service
  198. Category:Wikipedians who program conditional templates
  199. Category:Wikipedians who put really really long redlinked categories at the bottom of their userpage as a conversation piece
  200. Category:Wikipedians who retain deleted categories on their userpages
  201. Category:Wikipedians who should probably stop screwing around with categories, lest they draw unwanted attention from the Categories Police
  202. Category:Wikipedians who suspect that they are a sockpuppet of themselves
  203. Category:Wikipedians who think people who police user page categories need to find something else to do
  204. Category:Wikipedians who think this category should be deleted
  205. Category:Wikipedians who understand ParserFunctions
  206. Category:Wikipedians who use Anti-vandal tool
  207. Category:Wikipedians who use AutoShortDesc
  208. Category:Wikipedians who use Blender (software)
  209. Category:Wikipedians who use dashes script
  210. Category:Wikipedians who use Discord (software)
  211. Category:Wikipedians who use Eclipse (software)
  212. Category:Wikipedians who use FileZilla
  213. Category:Wikipedians who use GIMP
  214. Category:Wikipedians who use Git
  215. Category:Wikipedians who use GNU nano
  216. Category:Wikipedians who use Google Chrome
  217. Category:Wikipedians who use Google Drive
  218. Category:Wikipedians who use HotCat
  219. Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle
  220. Category:Wikipedians who use Inkscape
  221. Category:Wikipedians who use Microsoft Visual Studio
  222. Category:Wikipedians who use MonoBook
  223. Category:Wikipedians who use Notepad++
  224. Category:Wikipedians who use Paint.net
  225. Category:Wikipedians who use ProveIt
  226. Category:Wikipedians who use RedWarn
  227. Category:Wikipedians who use reFill
  228. Category:Wikipedians who use SpaceEngine
  229. Category:Wikipedians who use SWViewer
  230. Category:Wikipedians who use WeChat
  231. Category:Wikipedians who use wikEd
  232. Category:Wikipedians who use Wikipedia Mobile
  233. Category:Wikipedians who use WPCleaner
  234. Category:Wikipedians willing to assist with templates
  235. Category:Wikipedians willing to provide third opinions
  236. Category:Wikipedians with alternative accounts
  237. Category:Wikipedians with one or more red-linked categories on their user talk page
  238. Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user page
  239. Category:Wikipedians with unconventional user categories
  240. Category:Wikipedian typo adopters
  241. Category:Wikipedian user script developers
  242. Category:Wikipedian vector graphics editors
  243. Category:Wikipedian video game developers
  244. Category:Wikipedian WikiCats
  245. Category:Wikipedia pending changes reviewers
  246. Category:Wikipedia rollbackers
  247. Category:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors members
  248. Category:WikiProject Redirect participants
  249. Category:WikiProject Short descriptions participants
  250. Category:WikiProject Templates participants
  251. Category:WikiProject Userboxes participants
  252. Category:Wipedians who think this category should be deleted

Is there a policy that covers this? Seems a bit spammy to me. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:36, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I know of. Is it doing any harm to the project? I'd say not. Mjroots (talk) 08:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This looks to be Wikipedia:Userboxitis, which isn't sanction-able. Feel free to take their userpage to MfD if you'd like to cause them some minor annoyance for no benefit. Elli (talk | contribs) 09:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The harm to the project is cluttering up 252 categories with another entry. What if a thousand people decided to do that? That's the problem with spam. If it was done once it would be OK. If it is done hundreds of times it becomes spam instead of just being promotional. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine, and isn't really "cluttering up" anything. I'd withdraw the RFD if I were in your position. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I noticed that we publish a number of Regional and National Catholic Newspapers in the UK - some that we own, and others that we publish on behalf of other people. I am aware that you have lists of papers and pages of information for most UK newspapers but we've not added any information about our papers. I started add them all to Wikipedia, but I got the following message: It appears you are adding external links to many different Wikipedia pages in rapid succession. This is often a sign of people spamming Wikipedia... I was intending to add the links as that was a quick job - and then add a page of information for each publication (you already have one of our publications on the wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Voice_of_Lancaster - so I was going to add something similar for each one). I don't want to violate any of the rules regarding adding information so I thought it was best to check with you first before making any more updates.

Should I carry on with creating a page for each publication or should I stop?

Thanks, Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.39.128.93 (talk)

Hello, Nick. Wikipedia does not contain, and is not intended to contain, everything, but only things that meet its criteria of notability - roughly, that enough has been published about the subject in reliable sources that are totally independent of the subject to base an article on. For this reason, most list articles contain only entries that are notable - entries that are, or could be, the subject of independent Wikipedia articles. The article Catholic Voice of Lancaster, though it has been around for twelve years, is seriously deficient in not citing any sources, and unless somebody does find and add some suitable sources (remember, they have to be written and published completely independently of the subject) then that article is likely to get deleted, and will then get removed from List of newspapers in the United Kingdom. If any of your publications meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability, then somebody could write articles about them - preferably not you, because of your conflict of interest, but you are not forbidden to try, provided you make the necessary declarations as a WP:paid editor. But otherwise, no, Wikipedia will not take note of them. External links in Wikipedia articles are strictly controlled (according to the policy in EL), and in any case, adding links to a website you are associated with is regarded as a Conflit of Interest. In Wikipedia terms, yes, you were spamming. --ColinFine (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What WikiProjects have I joined?

[edit]

Over the years, I have joined a few WikiProjects. I can remember some of them, but I suspect there are others that have slipped my mind. I would like to clean them up - is there a way to find all the Projects I have joined?--Gronk Oz (talk) 07:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gronk Oz: Go to your user page, click on the link at the left side of the page marked "What links here". Then go down the list and see what Wikiprojects have your user name linked from them. I keep tabs on projects that I am a member of via a section of my user page. Mjroots (talk) 08:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A search can help narrow it down. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mjroots and PrimeHunter: that is exactly what I needed; thank you both! There are lots of projects there that I don't remember ever touching, so it's probably a good idea to clean them up. --Gronk Oz (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"This article incorporates information from the corresponding article in the French Wikipedia."

[edit]

Is there a template that could be used to add the text "This article incorporates information from the corresponding article in the French Wikipedia." and similar. I see templates for other Wikipedia:Wikimedia sister projects but not other language wikipedias. I'd like to replace the improper hatnote at Jacques Dufilho and other pages. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Shhhnotsoloud: uh, we shouldn't be citing Wikipedia at all... Elli (talk | contribs) 09:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, we shouldn't be citing other language Wikipedias. If it's a translation (which it looks like it is), then Template:Translated should be added to the talkpage, not the article itself. We definitely shouldn't be assuming that unsourced information is correct because it's on another language Wikipedia, which is what that hatnote is trying to do. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:53, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia#Translating from other language Wikimedia projects. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Joseph2302: and all: I think Template:Translated page is what I really wanted: thanks for bringing it to my attention. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article for April 7 date

[edit]

I was reading the article for the April 7 date ... located here ---> April 7. I wanted to make an edit to the introductory paragraph. When I hit the "Edit" button, there was really nothing to edit. It just listed a bunch of templates. So, I imagine that the entire template itself needs to be edited ... and that said edit would subsequently appear in all "date"-type of articles (not just the April 7 article). So, my question: what Talk Page do I need to go to? Here? Or somewhere else? This is my specific edit / question. The article states: 268 days remain until the end of the year.. I thought that sentences are not supposed to start with numbers. So, it would have to be re-worded to something like: A total of 268 days remain until the end of the year. (or some such wording). (Am I correct about that rule of grammar?) What needs to be done? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect this issue will affect the other 365 day of the year articles. You are correct that sentences should almost never start with figures. My suggestion would be to replace the full stop at the end of the first sentence with a semicolon. Mjroots (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The text is made by {{Day}}. There is already an old discussion at Template talk:Day#Present tense. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I can't make heads or tails out of that template page article ... {{Day}}. I don't see anywhere, where there is some sort of text that states "X number of days remain until the end of the year". (And, thus, said text would be edit-able, I imagine?) Also, that discussion is two years old ... so, posting there would not be effective. What -- if anything -- should I do? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It reads the day from the page name so the display is disabled at top of Template:Day where it would make a bunch of meaningless error messages. I have added an example display to Template:Day#Usage. On preview it displays what the previewed version would display. You can ask for input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:27, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images not showing on some election infoboxes

[edit]

I was creating an article for the 1949 New York City mayoral election using the infobox from the 1945 New York City mayoral election, but when I did this, I noticed that the middle images do not show in these infoboxes, despite being there in the source. I tried changing the sizes but it did not fix it. I could not identify any reason why this was happening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AJD2002 (talkcontribs) 17:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no |image2= parameter in that infobox. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No response to edit proposals on edit restricted articles - next step?

[edit]

Hi, a question for the Ediquette Team: I'm an unregistered IP, and there are pages I can't edit. Unless it's typos, I always declare on the talk page first anyway, but sometimes that's all that happens. Does it occur that some 'inedible' article is forgotten, more or less? I feel it would be inappropriate/fruitless to go "HEY GUYS!" on the talk page, so is there some other, established chain-of-command procedure to follow? I guess I could contact users found on the article history page, but is that comme il faut, or a faux pas? TiA! T 84.208.86.134 (talk) 23:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I understand the question to be, what happens if you want to suggest a change to a semi-protected page, and no one answers your comment on the article talk page? You can use the {{Edit semi-protected}} template, which puts your question in a category that helpful editors patrol. I'm not guaranteeing the response is quick - I haven't used it and don't really know the backlog time - but at least you're in the queue. You could also create an account. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Edit requests probably explains this better and in more detail than I can. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks, yes, that was indeed the question; and also the solution, it seems, although I've yet to try it. Thanks again :) T 84.208.86.134 (talk) 23:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a user page template for not being able to edit due to being in China and having spotty internet?

[edit]

I discovered the numerous WikiBreak templates today and decided to put one on my user page due to high school. Since I plan on going to China for university, and the VPN connections are spotty there, I plan on having another notice on my user page later this year. Is there a template for "this person will have limited access to Wikipedia due to being in China and having restricted Internet" or something like that? The "no internet" template doesn't seem to convey the right message. Thanks! Félix An (talk) 23:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Félix An: there is no need to use a template. Just put your message on your page using the usual markup. -Arch dude (talk) 02:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone help me neatly organize the userboxes on my user page?

[edit]

I see some people with their userboxes nicely lined up in a bigger box. Can someone help me do that on my user page, please? Thanks! Félix An (talk) 23:50, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Félix An: When you see a page with a format you like, you can open the page for editing to examine its wikitext to see how the formatting was accomplished. -Arch dude (talk) 02:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I used {{userboxtop}} here. PrimeHunter (talk) 08:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Félix An (talk) 12:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Félix An I'm happy with mine. Grab what I've done if you like it too Fiddle Faddle 12:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]