Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 238

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 235 Archive 236 Archive 237 Archive 238 Archive 239 Archive 240 → Archive 245

File:MGM Cartoon 60s.jpg

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Marole3 (talk) 01:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC) I think it should be kept.

Oku Tech

I believe the page follows all Wikipedia guidelines and does not contain any element with in intention of advertisement. -Jugmendra (talk) 08:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done Jugmendra, this is currently up for deletion as a proposed deletion. In this type of situation you can contest the deletion by removing the PROD template, although I'd recommend that you add more sourcing to the article. (For speedy deletions or AfD, you wouldn't be able to remove the template, but for PRODs you can. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Comaval/sandbox

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) User:Comaval/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comaval (talk • contribs) 08:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done It looks like portions of this were taken directly from this website. All content will need to be re-written in your own words. Some of it looks to be slightly closely paraphrased from things like this, but the lead contained two sentences taken directly from the first website. However that said, I will e-mail you a copy of the article so you can edit things. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:HG Christie draft

I, Paola.alvino, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paola.alvino (talk) 16:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:EzStorage

I, 2607:FCC8:6201:5C00:99A6:2A1C:CF62:6060, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2607:FCC8:6201:5C00:99A6:2A1C:CF62:6060 (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joan Susannah Sadler (nee Wilkinson)

I, Tswilk3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tswilk3 (talk) 18:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC) ,

Draft:Royal Aero Club Records Racing and Rally Association

I, Petechilcott, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Petechilcott (talk) 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


The website quoted as having the copyright has actually taken information from our organisations's handbook. I don't think we can infringe our own copyright in this insatnce -Petechilcott (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

no Declined. @Petechilcott: We cannot restore copyrighted material on the basis of the word of some Wikipedia account. You don't control the servers, you don't host or distribute the content of a Wikipedia article. The Wikimedia Foundation does that. And the Wikimedia Foundation doesn't have permission to distribute that content. A random Wikipedia account claiming to represent the copyright holder cannot grant that permission. Permission must be sent to the Wikimedia foundation via a communication channel that is verifiably traceable to the copyright holder, such as an email from your organization's domain, or a statement on your organization's web site that the handbook is either public domain or released to the public under an acceptable free license such as Creative Commons. See WP:CONSENT for more information. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

OK - I'm progressing! To which address should I send my email. I will also look at the Creative Commons path

Petechilcott (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Padyukov Sergey

I, Geneticist 007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Geneticist 007 (talk) 06:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Charter of Honour

I, Timoluege, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Timoluege (talk) 08:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Designite

I, Ocpjp7, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ocpjp7 (talk) 08:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Intent to edit and resubmit -Ocpjp7 (talk) 08:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Brenda Kerr

I, Rugbyleagueorg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rugbyleagueorg (talk) 03:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Kind of mildly concerned that the username looks like it represents an organization... Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
    @Rugbylelagueorg: Are you aware that organizations are not permitted to have Wikipedia accounts? Please go to WP:CHU/Simple and request a change of username that represents only you as an individual. I'm reluctant to proceed with your request until that is done. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Rugby, an example of what I found concerning would be this edit, which comes across as a little promotional, especially since it looks like it was taken from the club itself. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Unwoman

This article was previously recovered from deletion under PROD and it is my understanding that an article isn't supposed to be PRODed twice, which this one was. Please restore it again and, hopefully someone won't try PRODing it a third time. -Blackfyr (talk) 01:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unwoman, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RoySmith (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
  • Blackfyr, the second deletion was actually at AfD and not PROD, which is a completely different beast. I remember this AfD and it wasn't really easy to find sourcing overall, since a lot of it would be considered WP:TRIVIAL coverage. You can talk to RoySmith about getting the page restored or userfied, as he seemed open to the idea. The main thing you'd need to do is show where she's received more coverage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • This could be helpful, since it helps back up that she's a pioneer in the steampunk genre per the documentary. Of course we'd have to show that the documentary is notable, which might take time since it looks like it hasn't actually released yet. Still, it's a start. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I've restored this to Draft:Unwoman. You can continue to work on the article there. Please keep in mind that this does not mean it will automatically move back to mainspace; you will need to add appropriate sources to meet our notability rules, as per the AfD. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:SmartDeploy Enterprise

I, Ksmith2003, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ksmith2003 (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Continue to work on page for publication -Ksmith2003 (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Patricia Matthews (politician)

I, Calgarytech, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Calgarytech (talk) 16:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Patricia Matthews (politician) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Gradient-only optimisation

I, Saiteki-ka, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saiteki-ka (talk) 21:14, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:InvisibleMouse1.jpg

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Marole3 (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • @Marole3: This is a fair use image screenshot from The Invisible Mouse, a 1947 Tom and Jerry cartoon. It was deleted more than 6 years ago. What do you want to do with it? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

I think it's part of the article and should be restored. Also true for File:InvisibleMouse3.jpg.Marole3 (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Marole3.

  • Done Both restored and orphan timer extended. Please use, else they will delete again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:SprintGround

I, 86.88.22.168, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.88.22.168 (talk) 07:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Guillermo Garcia (businessman)

I am requesting that the hoax article Guillermo Garcia (businessman) be undeleted and archived to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Guillermo Garcia (businessman) as the second longest hoax existing on Wikipedia. -Pppery (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Wolves of Périgord

Uncontroversially deleted after being PROD-tagged with a blanket rationale as one of seven articles created by user Bearerofthecup.

Concerns:

  1. Wolfcatcher Royal was PROD-tagged with the blanket rationale, despite being an official public office that has been in existence in some form for approx. 716 years, and is today still a public office in France. PROD nominator does not speak or read French. Had they opened fr:Lieutenant de louveterie they would have noted a 16k article that can serve as expansion for the English.
  2. PROD nominator in the related discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf of Soissons made a non-policy based delete !vote because they were unable to read the language of most of the sources in that article despite numerous being presented, including making the false assumption that subject matter was fictional, when sources confirmed it being a fact. Nobody else opined deletion.
  3. Something similar happened when Wolf of Ansbach was de-PROD'ed and AfD'ed.

Thus I find a closer look at Wolves of Périgord is warranted. Please userfy to User:Sam Sailor/Drafts/Wolves of Périgord. -Sam Sailor Talk! 14:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Wolf of Sarlat

Uncontroversially deleted after being PROD-tagged with a blanket rationale as one of seven articles created by user Bearerofthecup.

Concerns:

Identical to Wolves of Périgord above

  1. Wolfcatcher Royal was PROD-tagged with the blanket rationale, despite being an official public office that has been in existence in some form for approx. 716 years, and is today still a public office in France. PROD nominator does not speak or read French. Had they opened fr:Lieutenant de louveterie they would have noted a 16k article that can serve as expansion for the English.
  2. PROD nominator in the related discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf of Soissons made a non-policy based delete !vote because he was unable to read the language of most of the sources in that article despite numerous being presented, including making the false assumption that subject matter was fictional, when sources confirmed it being a fact. Nobody else opined deletion.
  3. Something similar happened when Wolf of Ansbach was de-PROD'ed and AfD'ed.

Thus I find a closer look at Wolf of Sarlat is warranted. Please userfy to User:Sam Sailor/Drafts/Wolf of Sarlat. -Sam Sailor Talk! 14:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Hunting of Jean-Baptiste

Uncontroversially deleted after being PROD-tagged with a blanket rationale as one of seven articles created by user Bearerofthecup.

Concerns:

Identical to Wolves of Périgord above

  1. Wolfcatcher Royal was PROD-tagged with the blanket rationale, despite being an official public office that has been in existence in some form for approx. 716 years, and is today still a public office in France. PROD nominator does not speak or read French. Had they opened fr:Lieutenant de louveterie they would have noted a 16k article that can serve as expansion for the English.
  2. PROD nominator in the related discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf of Soissons made a non-policy based delete !vote because he was unable to read the language of most of the sources in that article despite numerous being presented, including making the false assumption that subject matter was fictional, when sources confirmed it being a fact. Nobody else opined deletion.
  3. Something similar happened when Wolf of Ansbach was de-PROD'ed and AfD'ed.

Thus I find a closer look at Hunting of Jean-Baptiste is warranted. Please userfy to User:Sam Sailor/Drafts/Hunting of Jean-Baptiste. -Sam Sailor Talk! 14:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Adrian Aizenstat

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -128.59.199.241 (talk) 18:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:CirrusPoint

I, NMSWizard, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NMSWizard (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Jinn Foo (model)

Undeletion my Article Please You help me -Newuser1122 (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

It is not yet deleted. Please expand, say why she is important, and supply references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I deleted an earlier version of this article as a hoax (Jinn Foo (fictional character))—there are no sources to confirm this character's existence, nevertheless to write an article. I am no longer watching this page—ping if you'd like a response czar 15:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Not done The A7 delete may be inappropriate, but it looks as if you have made up the character yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:FUJITSU GLOVIA, Inc.

I, Acharles3033, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Acharles3033 (talk) 19:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I already restored this and it is not deleted, just needs improving and resubmitting. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

File:OldRockinChairTom2.jpg and File:OldRockinChairTom4.jpg

These images should be in Tom and Jerry article Old Rockin' Chair Tom.12.84.192.170 (talk) 21:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)12.84.192.170

Can you please explain how the presence of these images will aid understanding of the topic? That requirement is not in the fair use rationale. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

I think 12.84.192.170 meant File:OldRockinChairTom2.jpg and File:OldRockinChairTom4.jpg should be undeleted. Marole3 (talk) 23:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

That's what I think too, but the fair use rationale with these images does not explain how having the images will improve understanding. One has a magnet pulling an iron into the mouth, and another looks like an iron is just under the skin on the back. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
I'd say the rationale for File:OldRockinChairTom2.jpg is to illustrate a key plot element showing Tom and Jerry cooperating on a plan to evict an interloper. It's a rare moment when the two aren't fighting or chasing each other, but working together. The other image, in my opinion, isn't necessary, for the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Techetarian

This Page should not be deleted because the blog http://techetarian.blogspot.com has helped me a lot in fixing my PC and the blog is very much impressive and it should be on Wikipedia. Wikipedia can let the blogger inspire and help many people learning out there ! -Harsh98trivedi (talk) 12:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

This page was deleted because it was blanked by its author. That said, that rationale means nothing to us - our inclusion rationale is whether it has been written about by others. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Not done Even if the author now wants to unblank this, it would still be eligible for deletion because of no claim of importance. I suggest that you start again at Draft:Techetarian stating why this blog is so important that it should have an entry in an encyclopedia, and have completely independent and reliable sources to provide the facts about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

LiL'Gang$ta

I, 2601:445:201:2D0E:5DAE:BCA0:88CC:FDCF, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:445:201:2D0E:5DAE:BCA0:88CC:FDCF (talk) 06:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Glebos Tkachenko

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dusavitskiy (talk) 09:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC) I made good article, and I am still working on it, I don't see any reason for deleting it! references are there, coverage of the person I am writing about are there!

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glebos Tkachenko, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user joe decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Naina Sarwar

I, Contactjerin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Want to update the contents. Right now I have enough media coverage. -Contactjerin (talk) 15:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

@Contactjerin: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Shantanu Maheshwari

I'm not able to create the page since it says it has been tried to create many times and hence its protected to be created and can only be created by an administrator. Shantanu Maheshwari is a popular TV star at this given time and I think he deserves to have a page in his name. Also he has done notable works in the indian entertainment industry as well as Internationally in shows such as World of Dance, America's Got Talent. Therefore kindly allow his page to be created -PriyaRam 1 (talk) 18:03, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

@PriyaRam 1: There is already a draft article at Draft:Shantanu Maheshwari. I have restored the deleted contribution history to that draft so that you can examine it, to use for improving the draft. It doesn't look ready to move back to article main space yet. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

File:OldRockinChairTom4.jpg

The first image was undeleted, but why not the second. Marole3 (talk) 22:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Based on Amatulić's opinion about how the picture helps understanding of the topic. There is still no justification for using File:OldRockinChairTom4.jpg, so if fails the WP:fair use criteria. If you can give a good reason it could still be restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Because it shows Tom kicking Lightning out. Marole3 (talk) 17:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

As I noted previously, you need to clarify what you're doing with it. Nyttend (talk) 23:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

I actually uploaded the file but image is empty, like I said I want to work on it. Marole3 (talk) 23:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

 Already done It looks like Amakuru restored it earlier. I have switched the page to an earlier in the history and changed the timer for delete. So use it or lose it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

LiL' Gang$ta

{{subst:refund LiL' Gang$ta Page name goes here Because he is a real musician who deserves his credit Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below}}

Yes the name was actually LiL' Gang$ta. I disagree with the G11 deletion reason but I do agree with the A7 reason. You could ask user:Acroterion or User:fastily who deleted this page. I do not know whether the band fits with Wikipedia:Yet another MySpace band, but the references in the article are from MySpace. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
No point in asking Fastily's opinion; his administrative abilities were taken away four years ago, because he asked for them to be removed, so he can't see anything of the deleted content. Nyttend (talk) 23:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
You are right about that! (I thought rights were regained) The purpose in asking is to see if the deleter objects to the action being reversed. I don't think the page is suitable to be an article, but could be restored as a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Students' Information and Guidance Bureau

I, Anupvshenoy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anupvshenoy (talk) 08:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Raymond (Ray) Alexander Brown

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 72.229.255.2 (talk) 12:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)


Creating Draft:Raymond (Ray) Alexander Brown

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Raymond (Ray) Alexander Brown Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Thomas Russell

File is being used in an article under construction. This was explained on the file page and further information supplied on the talk page -Craig (talk) 13:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

@Craig.cgc:  Done, image restored. Use it or lose it. When you use it, remove the deletion tag. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:46, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

John D Wood & Co.

Please restore this article. Thanks in advance. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me

@Ottawahitech: -------- Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:58, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft: Karl J. Furr

More research was required and more text needs to be added, please restore original essay -GlobalTeams (talk) 20:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Wildeboer Dellelce

I, 67.211.114.162, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 67.211.114.162 (talk) 22:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


Intend to edit and re-submit. Thank you. -67.211.114.162 (talk) 22:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Wildeboer_Dellelce

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -67.211.114.162 (talk) 21:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Shaze Tempain

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.80.73 (talk • contribs) 05:33, 5 July 2016‎

no Declined as the deleting admin. Try Wikipedia:Articles for creation next time, and read Wikipedia:Golden rule and WP:MUSICBIO to get an idea of what would be required before that article can be accepted in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hameed, Punjab Province

I, Faizan4140, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Faizan4140 (talk) 02:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I am trying to add my village and its details and I am not an expert or regular wikipedia writer so may be there are some errors in my page and I want to correct them -Faizan4140 (talk) 02:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Faizan4140: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Enzo_Zacchiroli

Received no indication that modifications were necessary -Drdjoneswiki (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

You mean you didn't see the note on your talk page that the page was declined and details would be left in the decline notice on the draft itself? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:19, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Idibri

I, Meroberts86, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Meroberts86 (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Meroberts86: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Alexa Koenig

draft was rejected for inadequate notability. However, the subject, Dr. Koenig, was recently interviewed on PBS's The Open Mind, a nationally broadcast television show, as the sole interviewee on the episode. I believe this increases her notability. It can be seen at http://www.thirteen.org/openmind/civil-rights/genocide-with-impunity/5473/ -InnerOstrich (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@InnerOstrich: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Ishita Ganguly (TV Actress)

Please note Ishita is a well known actress in Hindi Television in India.She has done well known Hindi serials like Shastri Sisters,where she was the main lead,than she did Tu Mera Hero and lately Ishq Ka Rang Safed.As a new user of Wikipedia,i Would love if you could tell me where i was wrong and how to change and make it the way wikipedia accepts the page rather than deleting it.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shilam singh (talk • contribs) 00:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

  • @Shilam singh: It looks like this was redirected to the article for Shastri Sisters per this AfD, so you'd need to talk to UtherSRG about recreation. Offhand what you'll need to do is show where her roles in the other productions are notable. You can do this by showing where she's received coverage in places like newspapers and something that might help is that this coverage doesn't have to be in English - it can be in Hindi as well. Offhand here are some of the sourcing I found: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. I'm actually going to take a copy of this into my userspace for the both of us to work on, since there looks like there could be a good argument for overturning the AfD here, especially since India sourcing can be difficult to find unless you know where to look, as Google doesn't always bring back all results - especially if you're only searching in English. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I've started an article here. Offhand the biggest issue is that there's a ton of coverage for her work in Shastri Sisters, but not much for anything other than that. If you can find 1-3 lengthy sources that discuss her work in her most recent TV shows, that'd be really helpful in establishing independent notability now. I'm also going to ask for help at WP:INDIA. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I do need to note that this won't be moved to the mainspace without UtherSRG's consent, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:46, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Andras Jones

My wikipedia page appears to have been deleted because I am an "Actor with no significant roles in major films" and "Although he won a Young Artist Award in 1988, there's not much aside from that and my searches found nothing good with this 2002 Spin article being the best. SwisterTwister talk". It is an unenviable position in which to find one's self, having to contest such a discounting of one's career, but in almost 30 years in the entertainment business I have certainly experienced worse. In regard to the assertion of insignificance, the Nightmare on Elm Street series is one of, if not the most, successful horror franchise of all time, and I play a lead role in the 4th installment. I have also played the lead in other cult horror classics like "The Attic Expeditions", "Sorority Babes In The Slimeball Bowl-A-Rama" and the "Night Trap" video game. I have starred in films opposite Drew Barrymore, Jennifer Jason-Leigh and Viggo Mortensen, and played a beloved illiterate bully in "Saved By The Bell". All of this can be found on my IMDB page. As for the Young Artist Award from 1988, I won no such award although I may have been nominated. What I can report is that, beyond my work in film, I have had a book published "Accidental Initiations: In The Kabbalistic Tree of Olympia" (Sync Book Press 2012), recorded and released over ten albums with my band Mr. Jones & The Previous and solo (many of these songs have appeared in motion picture soundtracks), and I have created and produced The Radio8Ball Show since 1998. Radio8Ball has been covered on NPR's "All Things Considered", as well as in the pages of the LA Times, The Boston Globe and all of the major Seattle papers, so I'm surprised all your researcher could come up with was an award I didn't win in 1988.

Every year I attend horror conventions attended by thousands of fans of the horror genre in general and Nightmare on Elm Street in particular. While I appreciate that my endeavors as an author, musician and as the producer of the world's foremost musical divination show may not be deemed wiki-worth to some, it is an insult to the Nightmare series and its legions of fans to suggest that "The Dream Master" is not a major film or that the role of Rick Johnson is not significant.

I look forward to your decision on this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by R8B (talk • contribs) 20:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andras Jones, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. It may be possible to restore this to a draft, so that the factual errors, and omissions can be rectified. But we can just do a summary override of the AFD discussion here. To do that there must be another formal discussion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Badger Maps

I, Jack Willow, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jack W. 06:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I noted on the talk page that you would not be doing any work yourself, rather that other editors would. That concerns me since there's no declaration from the other editors at all (ie, we can't guarantee that they'd actually work on it) and I need to note that if this isn't worked on and the article gets G13'd again, it's unlikely that this would be restored a second time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Logos of television channels and a radio station of the Netherlands

These three images, which was uploaded in 2012 was deleted by Diannaa, one image, which was also uploaded in 2012 was deleted by James086 and one image, which was uploaded in November 2015 was deleted by Explicit under F5. I would like to request these pages be restored so I can license them under a free license or in the public domain, because I think that these logos are simple and consists of text and simple geometric shape. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. XPanettaa (talk) 21:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Since you have failed to answer the question about whether you represent the companies that own copyright on these logos, I assume that you are not such a person. However I have restored two, one of which looks to be simple enough, and the other might be too simple for copyright. The other ones I would count as too complex , so that copyright applies. But if you want to use them on en.wikipedia then a restore can take place. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 Comment: @Graeme Bartlett: I wanted to let you know that File:Mgm channel nl.png, which is probably too complex, is licensed under CC-zero (which you mentioned at my talk page). See this when and where this has happened and then restore these three three (which is not yet restored and you counted as too complex) there above and these four here below:
I don't think that image is related to the ones you mention. However I suspect that the CC-zero on that is bogus, as at the current site of the image it says no such thing, permitting non commercial use only and a number of other restrictions and caveats. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

XPanettaa (talk) 20:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

I have restored File:Ziggo Logo.png, as it may be too simple for copyright. I could not track down the IFD discussion, so consider it ignored. The others are complex enough for copyright to apply, but could be restored if you want to use them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: I think I want to use them. By the way, File:Sublime FM logo.png, which is from Wikimedia Commons, was uploaded as {{PD-textlogo}}, so if this this logo is probably too simple for copyright to apply, File:SubLime FM.jpeg is presumably also probably too simple for copyright to apply, as the image from Commons, which looks the same as this one, which was uploaded in November 2012 and deleted by James086 in March 2014 under F5, was uploaded as in the public domain, because it only consists of text and shape. This means that File:Sublime FM logo.png and File:SubLime FM.jpeg are probably the same thing. XPanettaa (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
That is too complex as it has a texture. If you made a differnt texture that looked the same I think it would be fine, or if solid black text it would be pd-simple. But since you want to use them I can restore as fair use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: Okay, restore them as fair use, because I want to use them. XPanettaa (talk) 13:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you (: XPanettaa (talk) 08:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

File:N64 Super Mario 64 flying.jpg, File:N64 Super Mario 64 metal.jpg, File:N64 Super Mario 64 invisible.jpg

File:N64 Super Mario 64 flying.jpg, File:N64 Super Mario 64 metal.jpg, and File:N64 Super Mario 64 invisible.jpg are part of Super Mario 64 page. They show different caps Mario is wearing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.84.192.170 (talk) 19:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately that's a bit much. We don't need an image for each Mario powerup. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

In think it's part of the article and want it restored 12.84.192.170 (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

And that would breach the de minimis criterion. We don't need an image for each of the three at once. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sahra Motalebi

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Staticrecital (talk) 16:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Farai Mutamangira

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Oebryn (talk) 22:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

I am requesting undeletion on the referenced article and here are my reasons:

1. The update(re-edit) to that article was my own original work. I never copied it, however the real cause of deletion was never mentioned or rather articulated to me. 2. My sources were very reliable and solid sources which include the American Bar Association, A book by and many other articles from leading newspapers in Zimbabwe and Southern Africa. 3. This was a complete re-edit of the article and I had requested that the article be reviewed again after the update.

I really feel that the Administrator must revise or re-check the article and its sources and bring to my attention anything I missed. In the stead the administartor simply noted to me that the article "must be deleted for a variety of reasons".

  • The article was deleted because it was written in promotional style. Perhaps you could have asked User:DGG about this as he was the one who deleted it. Perhaps you can ask him for this to be made into a draft so that the tone can be changed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mahesh Mathai

I, Maheshmathai, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Maheshmathai (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

{{Mahesh Mathai |2= not edited for 6 months}}

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have restored the history, since it is already recreated. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_238&oldid=1138664165"