Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 18

< December 17	December 19 >

December 18

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This template continues to not be used on any articles' talk pages. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 23:13, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Another useless template IMO. If we need it at some point in the future we can remake it then but for now its just clutter. --Kumioko (talk) 04:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Uw-mos4

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 March 6.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-mos4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Uw-mos3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Potentially a csd-t2 speedy deletable template but I wanted to allow some debate. The blocking policy doesn't say anything about blocking for not following the (sometimes bewildering) Manual of Style. The Manual of Style isn't even a policy. It is only a guideline. Some may try hard to follow it, others may not. If this template accomplishes anything, it's that it scares away newbies (and sometimes veteran editors) :) Marcus Qwertyus 21:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. People should not be blocked just because their edit is hard to read! (Note: I have also added {{Uw-mos3}} to the list.) --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 23:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If a 3rd level warning ({{uw-mos3}}) was issued ("If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing".) before, and they persist, then a block might help bringing the message. Hadn't noticed the 3-part - sorry. I guess we can always use the {{uw-vandalism4}} msgs for the most persistent cases. DVdm (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WorldSeriesRt2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WorldSeriesRt2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This seems to be a failed experiment which has been abandoned and will not replace Template:World Series --Muboshgu (talk) 18:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Translated tag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Translated tag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is originally disigned for Wikimedia Commons. It is useless for English Wikipedia because en:wp is not a multilingual project. Kwj2772 (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pokémon character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pokémon character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox template, largely taken over by {{Infobox animanga character}}. —Farix (t | c) 13:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as historical like Template:Pokémon species? _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 18:39, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- We don't keep templates around if they are no longer use. Nor do we tag templates as {{historical}}, which is only for project pages. —Farix (t | c) 19:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - If you look at the link I provided, the species template was moved into project space and archived. I don't care either way, but since it was done before, I figured this could too. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 01:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't really think it is important to keep around an unused template. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 20:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Poke-expand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Poke-expand (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Duplicates {{Expand section}} —Farix (t | c) 12:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Currently, we aren't subcategorizing {{Expand}} templates. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 23:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Isn't important enough to keep as historical. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 18:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unused and unnecessary. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 20:49, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GMA KiliTV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GMA KiliTV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not everything needs a navbox. Not only most of these templates contains only 2-3 shows, it also clutters the articles that are linked on these templates. This template was originally tagged for deletion in this discussion page but failed to be included on the list. -WayKurat (talk) 09:02, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SinCityComic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SinCityComic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to the other comic infoboxes. Mhiji (talk) 01:43, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Midland Main Line1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Midland Main Line1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cuyahoga Valley Scenic Railroad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cuyahoga Valley Scenic Railroad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WP Organized Labour Toolbar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP Organized Labour Toolbar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red linked. Mhiji (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPAVIATION Toolbar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPAVIATION Toolbar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red linked. Mhiji (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vowels with audio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:IPA vowels audio. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vowels with audio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now Template:IPA vowels audio does the job. Redirect if needed (for the WP:pages and so). -DePiep (talk) 01:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
redirect seems like the least disruptive course of action here. Thryduulf (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:US-ForeignDecorations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US-ForeignDecorations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it looks like an article to me... 65.94.46.54 (talk) 08:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Thumbs-Up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G2 — GorillaWarfare ^talk 06:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thumbs-Up (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red linked. Mhiji (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sponsored/Jmco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G2. Airplaneman ✈ 04:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sponsored/Jmco (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red linked Mhiji (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SCAG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:49, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SCAG (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red link Mhiji (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Navies/OF/Turkey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G2. Airplaneman ✈ 04:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Navies/OF/Turkey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red linked. Mhiji (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.