Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 29

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

SEMTA s-line templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused s-line templates for SEMTA Commuter Rail. S-line was never implemented for this service, probably because we don't have articles for any of the former stops, save Pontiac Transportation Center. If that changes in the future we'll use Module:Adjacent stations instead. Mackensen (talk) 22:00, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused; probably orphaned when the associated South African infoboxes were converted to {{infobox settlement}} Frietjes (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the table was moved to 2013 Tippeligaen with attribution. Gonnym (talk) 16:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused since 2013 Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol provincial elections uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused since 2008 Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol provincial elections#South Tyrol uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused since 2008 Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol provincial elections uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 15:59, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:05, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused TV-related templates. Gonnym (talk) 15:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:03, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can be merged with the article, 2010–11 Egyptian Premier League, easily. Also per this discussion. Ben5218 (talk) 13:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 07:59, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:03, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can be merged with the article, 2009–10 Egyptian Premier League, easily. Also per this discussion. Ben5218 (talk) 13:33, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:00, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox character. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Shakespearean character with Template:Infobox character.
Similar to multiple previous fictional character infobox merge discussions, {{Infobox Shakespearean character}} should replaced by {{Infobox character}}.

Out of the 18 parameters of the infobox, 9 are present at the general template: |name=, |multiple=, |image=, |image_size=, |image_upright=, |alt=, |caption=, |creator=, |family=. 4 are present with different names: |play= is used for |series=, |portrayed_by= for |portrayer=, |other_names= for |aliases= and |associates= for |affiliation=.

That leaves |date=, |source=, |role=, |quote= and |see_also=. |source= is used 6 times and in 3 different ways - twice it is used for the same value series, twice it is as "Shakespeare's invention", once as "fictional" and once as a "based on" entry. So the only correct use would be the based on, which is already supported in the general infobox. |see_also= is used 3 times and all uses are also as a "based on" parameter. |date= and |quote= could either use one of the custom fields or just not be added, I support not adding them. Gonnym (talk) 13:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

here is the mess it makes
Unused template that mangles the display title if it were to be used. There is no such 'namespace' as well. — xaosflux Talk 11:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).