Wikipedia talk:Sanctions against editors should not be punitive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEssays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Proposing move[edit]

Per WP:ESSAYS, this should probably be placed in the userspace of the creator, ScienceApologist (talk · contribs) until/unless it proves to be something that reflects a broader consensus of Wikipedians. SA, would you be amenable to such a move? --Elonka 22:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think with some additional input it would make a reasonable projectspace essay. —Locke Cole • t • c 00:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"We're not punishing you..."[edit]

"...we're saving you from yourself." @harej 22:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors are not punitive → Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors should not be punitive – Guideline is more helpful than a description, especially when the latter is inaccurate. Hyacinth (talk) 04:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC) Hyacinth (talk) 04:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've fixed the request, assuming you don't want to move the essay to WT space. --BDD (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: The fact that the current title isn't true is the entire reason the essay exists!  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  10:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think this is a good idea. WhatamIdoing (talk) 14:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Request upgrade to guideline[edit]

I believe that this essay has earned enough support from the community that it should be upgraded to a guideline.--Mr. Guye (talk) 22:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, if the interest is building an encyclopedia then this should be paramount over punitive measures that have no inherent benefit for the mission of collecting free knowledge. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (Sockpuppets 🎭) (Articles 📚) 20:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions against editors should not be punitive[edit]

What about sanctions against admins? QuackGuru (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@QuackGuru: All admins are editors. No one has passed WP:RFA without making a single edit. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Sanctions_against_editors_should_not_be_punitive&oldid=1146689561"