User:JoergenB
A temporary font experiment: ℬ ℬ)
My name is Jörgen Backelin; I am a mathematician by profession; and have some side interests, like evolution theory, language history, and Scandinavian medieval ballads. My home page
My immediate reason for joining the Wikipedia community is that I feel that I might contribute by adding or improving some items in the mathematics section.
![]() |
---|
14 August 2024 |
|
|
Some nice pages:
[edit]- Evolution
- List of common Indo-European roots (transwikied)
- List of folk song collections
- Petersen graph
Some other useful links:
[edit]General editing tools
|
---|
- Wikipedia:List of shortcuts
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mathematics
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mathematics/Conventions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rational Skepticism
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Sweden
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations (at least while working with science academies)
- Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign
- WP:MSM
- Wikipedia:Requested articles/Mathematics
- List_of_mathematics_articles
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Geology/Cambrian explosion
- Mathematics stubs
- Algebra stubs
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types (WP:STUBS)
- Wikipedia:Template_messages
- Wikipedia:Translation_into_English/Swedish
- Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
- Category:Mathematics websites
Other projects:
[edit]- Interwiki map (More efficient link?)
- Wiktionary
- Appendix:Internet slang
- commons:User:JoergenB
- meta:User:JoergenB
- WikiSpecies
- b:User:JoergenB
- d:User:JoergenB
- Less useful???
Ongoing or planned work
[edit](you may add signed suggestions for getting my attention; but I won't promise to do anything about them)
- Graham number
- Ramsey's theorem
- List of folk song collections
- Modular lattice
- Free ideal ring
- Linear span, free module, and other articles, where there seems to be a confusion between "generated (in general)" and "finitely generated".
- Consider also missing parts of generating set; inspiration possible from older version.
- Approximant as a mathematical term. The article Approximant refers to the linguistic term, and IMHO should continue to do so; but a redirects and/or forks should be added. See User:JoergenB/Approximant for an outline.
- User:JoergenB/Ian Douglas Willock I planned a stub; but without at least his birthyear it were more like a substub.
- User:JoergenB/The 2018 Secretary-General of the European Commission appointment controversy (19:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC))
- User:JoergenB/Koulla Yiasouma Again, a bit hard to find biographic information. 23:53, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Old undetected large scale acts of vandalism
[edit]In a couple of places, I have found large scale removals of sections, which were acts of pure vandalism. In those cases, the vandal replacements texts were removed later, but not the major part of the vandalised material. Viriditas has indicated that this is not a quite unique phenomenon, and that most such cases seem to have occurred in the years 2005 to 2008. Might be worth to look for - at least if anyhow I look at older versions.
The cases I know:
- Brain tumor; c.f. Talk:Brain tumor#Causes, 18 February 2010 (removal date: 10 april 2007).
- Tsetse fly; c.f. Talk:Tsetse fly#Old undetected large scale vandalism, 18 March 2011 (removal date: 23 April 2008).
- Mispronunciation; c.f. Talk:Mispronunciation#suppressed part, 1 June 2019 (removal date: 9 June 2006).
A propos the tsetse fly vandalism, User:Viriditas wrote: "I find this kind of thing quite a bit, and the problematic years appear to be 2005-2008."
Places where I've put questions, and should check up answers...
[edit]- Talk:Mutatis mutandis 2008-09-24
Fixed itself; a reasonable and stable consensus version seems achieved 12:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Indexed family#Origin of Indexed Families? 16:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC).
- Talk:Lysander Spooner#Libertarian v. Socialist 2008-10-07 Got answer putting further question 2010-01-10; I should try to get access to Woodcock's book, since the user who quoted it in the first place seems to be inactive. Noted 13:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
De facto fixed 2010-11-02 by User:Eduen, who found the reference, but didn't address the talk page.
- Talk:Infinite_monkey_theorem#Definitely_wrong_but_morally_right 2008-10-07
- Talk:Anglophilia 2008-10-23; Anglophilia -> Anglophilic?
Done 12:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Phonetics#Two_questions 2008-10-27
- User talk:Toby Bartels, about EFF 2008-11-08
- Talk:Family of sets 2008-11-08
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 November 12, Category_talk:Scientific_societies#Category confusion
Done 2008, noted 16:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Anglicisation#Anglicised historical personal names 16:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Done 17:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts 17:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Talk:Green Revolution#What does "consensus" mean? 20:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Talk:World Union, having put Unbalanced label 15:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC) Page deleted 2010-07-22 (including Talk page?)
- Category talk:Associations#Inadequate catmore? 15:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Done 17:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Commensurability (mathematics) 18:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Ratio#Ratios and commensurability 19:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Meter (music)#British spelling priority, revisited 17:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Overpopulation (3 sections) 20:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Anarchist Exclusion Act#Preventive effects 13:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change#The two IAP coordinated statements in 2009 15:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Long and short scales#Mixed usage in British English 15:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Carbon dioxide#The IAP statement on ocean acidity 23:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Capital punishment in Europe#Two abolishment year columns 16:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Catechism of the Catholic Church#"False" ecumenism? 17:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Done
- Talk:Third Order of Saint Dominic#Some minor POV formulations. 13:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC). Also Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Catholicism#Third Order of Saint Dominic, 18:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC).
- Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Mathematics/2010_August_3#A more general question 18:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Société des Artistes Indépendants 16:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Petrus Thaborita#"Real name"? 13:15, 13 October 2010 (UTC) (ought not to be controversial, I think)
- Talk:Kinich Ahau#Merge from Ah Kin? 19:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Elision#Other uses (within linguistics) 19:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Tutelary deity#Are saints and djinns deities? 21:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Category talk:Histories of cities in Denmark#Misnomer? 14:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- User_talk:Goldenrowley#Old stub mark JoergenB (talk) 21:30, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:Metrication_in_the_United_States#Visually balanced reference frequencies 21:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum#Comparing clergy in global contexts 21:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Numerology#Numerology_in_gaming 20:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Done 09:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy#How are spelling variants treated? 16:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Template talk:Cleanup/doc#Bad categorical alphabetisation 22:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC); follow-up: User_talk:Rich Farmbrough#Bad categorical alphabetisation 19:46, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology#Should a CoA in proper terminology consist of the bare escutcheon or of the full achievement? 22:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Talk:Road_coloring_problem#What the theorem states, and what it does not state. 19:44, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia_talk:Bot_requests#Should the long description of this WP page be clarified? 18:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- User talk:Lovejoyhealth and Talk:Ascended Master Teachings 18:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Done 10:20, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Talk:Syrian Monastery, Egypt 21:28, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Talk:Interpolation (manuscripts)#Assumed interpolations in religious scriptures.; and, somewhat related, Talk:Mark 16#The authenticity Point Of View dominance 22:49, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Talk:Bible_errata#What this article isn't 16:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Analysis categorised? 15:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Talk:National Assembly for Wales#How bilingual is the assembly in practice? 19:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Talk:Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty#Notice of intent. 15:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Done 2011-11-06T15:29:52
- Talk:Equivalence 21:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Talk:Green-beard effect#Green beard or monster male? 18:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Talk:List of Bilderberg participants#Employing primary sources is not automatically OR 17:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
From p. 200 in Über entwickelungsgeschichte der Tiere, 1827:
- Nichts war leichter. Ein Fisch, der ans Land schwimmt, möchte dort gern spazieren gehn, wozu er seine Flossen nicht gebrauchen kann. Sie verschrumpfen in der Breite aus Mangel an Uebung und wachsen dagegen in die Länge. Das geht über auf Kinder und Enkel einige Jahrtausende hindurch. Da ist es dann kein Wunder, daß aus den Flosse zuletzt Füße werden. Noch natürlicher ist es, daß der Fisch auf der Wieße, da er kein Wasser findet, nach Luft schnappt. Dadurch triebt er endlich in einen eben so lange Frist Lungen hervor, wozu nur erfordert wird, daß einige Generationen sich unterdessen ohne Athmung behelfen.
Rough translation:
- Nothing was easier. A fish which swims to the shore would like to go walkin' there, for which its fins are not useful. Those shrink in width, due to lack of training, and on the other hand grow in length. This passes over to children and further offspring during some millenia. Thus, there is no wonder, that the fins finally turn to feet. It is even more natural, that the fish in the meadow, where it does not find any water, [snappar efter; gasps for] air. Thereby, it eventually, after just a while, acquires lungs, where just a few generations must get by without breathing.
From p. 220, ibid.:
- Eine bleibende thierform aber, welche den Typhus der Wirbelthiere hätte, und eine so geringe histologische und morphologische Sonderung, wie die Embryonen der Wirbelthiere, ist nicht bekannt. Mithin durchlaufe die Embryonen der Wirbelthiere in ihre Entwickelung gar kaine (bekannten) bleibenden Thierformen. [Emphasis in the original.]
Rough translation:
- However, there is no known recent kind of animal of the vertebrates type and such a small [särprägel? difference? partition?] as that of the embryos of the vertebrates. Thus, in their development, the vertebrate embryos do not pass through a stage [representing] any (known) recent vertebrate.
From p. 257-258, ibid.:
- Im Grunde hätte ich also die Ausdrücke Typus und Schema mit einem gemeinsamen vertauschen können. Ich habe sie nur aus einander gehalten, um eben dadurch recht geschaulich zu machen, daß jede organische Form, in Hinsicht des Typus, das was sie ist, durch die Art der Bildungsweise wird. Das Schema der Entwickelung ist nichts als der werdende Typus, und der Typus das Resultat des Bildungsschema.
Rough translation:
- Thus, basically, I could have replaced the expressions type and schema with a common one. I have only kept them apart, in order thus to make it [överskådligt; transparent?], that with respect to the type what any organic form is it becomes by means of the ontogenesis.
(The story about the two confused embryos is printed in p. 221 of this work.)
Things someone probably should do something about; and possibly sometime in the future I might look at
[edit]- Dimension versus Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry). The latter replaced the former in Euclidean group (elsewhere??), and does not seem to contain any hint of the fact that this is one of the major ways mathematicians define dimension.
- Relation algebra (suggested by Ramsey2006).
- Declension (and some other grammar related articles), where sometimes clearer definitions are needed, and often better layperson exemplification.
- Latin declension et al.: Case order; explaining cases; locative as a separate case or not.
- Genomics, Human genome: Explain some of the most asked questions on e.g. the genetic background for sex distribution in human. Go back into history, find or make template, (re)insert information on the various sequenced genomes; readers will wish to be able to look them up.
- Prime Minister of the Faroe Islands. I think all wcich may have wanted an opinion have expressed that in one or another WP; meaning essentially myself, User:Arne List, and User:Quackor; others have not responded. The list of older løgmenn absolutely not is a list of "prime ministers", in any sense. There are reasons to retain one list; although in some respects, the modern "løgmaður" more is a continuation of the "amtsmaður"; with the important distinction that the amtsmenn (like many of the older løgmenn but as distinct from the modern ones) were appointed from Denmark.
Proposed remedy: Make a true article out of the present redirect page Løgmaður, treating the concept itself, and its historical development, and for the older part comparing with other Scandinavian lagmän ("law speakers"; note that at least one official English translation of a document mentioning them used the Danish lagman as English translation of løgmaður). Move the present article to List of løgmenn or something similar; and modify it slightly (removing the inference that the older ones were prime ministers, and referring to the new article). Make a redirect from the new Prime Minister of the Faroe Islands to Løgmaður. Fix the iw links; the split into one "ssubject article" and one "list" appears elsewhere, too. Finally, check infoboxes et cetera. - Category:Ethnologists vs. Category:Folklorists (with all their national subpages, and their sisters). Somewhat confused; fundamentally probably since the European colonialists could not consider study of "other kinds of humans" as on par with study of their own peoples.
- The redirect pages Barycentre and Barycenter now are misleading. From my point of view, the best content would be the content of the present article Centroid, augmented with a few alternative meaning directs at the top. However, the word "centroid" feels a bit funny; I'd like to find an independent source for it to be the mainly used term, first. 18:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Preadaption or exadaption should be explained or linked to; there are articles Exaptation and Preadaptation, though. A source: [1]. Check in OED and Dawkins for spellings with or without -at-! See also: User:Pengo/zoo. 20:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- There is some confusion about the terms Chaldean and Chaldian - at least in my mind:-). Attempts att "defusion":
- Chaldeans (sw. kaldéer) seemingly primarily refers to semitic-speaking people in Chaldea, in (or to?) the south of Mesopotamia, then close to the shore of the Persian Gulf. (The area includes the Sumerian city Ur, later taken by the Chaldeans.)
- Chaldians(?) (sw. Kalder), on the other hand, primarily relates to the people in Urartu, speaking a Hurrian related language. This area seemingly was centered at lake Van (which I thought was held by the Hittites - but perhaps that was slightly earlier?). Sources: The urartu articles in Svensk Uppslagsbok and in Encyclopædia Britannica, both in printed versions from the '50's.
- There is an article about Chalybes claiming that "in antiquity" (by which is meant Græco-Roman times), also called Chaldoi, which might treat the remnants of the Urartians, but seem to refer to an area centred more to the north; and which is included in our {{Kartvelians}}. (The latter is not necessarily completely out of the blue, even for Urartian; there are serious attempts to link Hurro-Urartian with some modern Caucasian languages; cf. Alarodian languages. On the other hand, neither that article, nor our main articles about Caucasian languages, nor (even implicitly) the template Kartvelian seems to link the Northeast Caucasian languages with Kartvelian. Is 'the Kartvelian-Hurro-Urartian connection' a 'discovery only valid for Georgians'?)
- We have no article, dab, or redir from "Chaldian". Our dab Chaldean starts "Chaldeans (or Chaldians) may refer to...", but contains no reference to Chaldians as defined supra. However, our Urartu article mentions the term Khaldian (which should be another spelling of Chaldian, I suppose), claiming that they called themselves Khaldini. We also have no asrticle, dab, or redib titled Khaldian.
- All this is very confusing; and until to-day I had no idea that professional West Asia historians would make a distinction between the ancient Chaldeans and the ancient Chaldians. The terminology should be clarified - preferrably first finding out about possible deviations in modern terminology as compared to the 60 years old one, and appropriate cross references and "not to confuse with"'s should be inserted. It may also have some bearings on Ur Kaśdim. 21:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- "Evaluation function" does not lead to what I thought it would. I did find "the usual" (defined as the one I have used) meaning in Dual space, referred to as evaluation map. However, the latter term now redirects to initial topology, where it is employed for a kind of pullback. If something is done about "the usual meaning", then some link from the dab Evaluation (disambiguation) should be provided, and perhaps also comparisons with the Bra-ket notation, and discussions of LISPish Apply. 18:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Missing mathematics related articles or links
[edit]At least partially fixed
[edit]- Homological dimension (JackSchmidt fixed a disambiguation page; see User talk:JoergenB#Global (homological) dimension).