User talk:CarpetCrawler

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

I am now semi-retired, and most likely will take a very long time to respond to any queries, as I do not show up here often.

If I have left you a message: please answer on my talk page, else inform me.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on your talk page, unless you request otherwise.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Archive 1 (July 08 - Dec. 08)
Archive 2 (Dec. 08 - April 09)
Archive 3 (April 09 - May 09)
Archive 4 (May 09 - June 09)

Jackson projects

Please comment here, a debate on the future of WP:MJJ and WP:JANET. — R ² 14:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, could you please comment here and watchlist the article for a few weeks. Cheers. — R ² 16:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Oh, you archived. Oops, I thought you said "India", LOL, I feel so embarrassed. :D See, that shows ya that I don't pay close attention to stuff. You probably don't care, but oh well, I'll tell you anyway: I finished my exams yesterday and couldn't be happier. Yay. :) Well, I've never been to Indiana, but I do hear that they got some good food there, not sure, just heard. Yes, send me a message or IM me. If I come up with something, I'll let you know. Before I forget, have a safe trip and you call me when you get there. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hi there, I have nominated Scream/Childhood for peer review. I would like to send it to FAC over the summer. Any assistance is appreciated. — R ² 11:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Im your biggest fan...

Hey Carpet. Was quite busy this weekend hence didnot get chane to wikify. How are you and wassup? I'm nominating True Blue (album) for GA. *fingers crossed* --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:53, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Collins

I don't suppose you could work on this article? Currently it's not even GA worthy, let alone FA standard. So much of it is unsourced. It will have to be delisted if it doesn't get some TLC :( — R ² 16:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, something to work on over the summer I expect. However, since there are GA sweeps underway, it wouldn't surprise me if FA sweeps come soon as well ... — R ² 20:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Im out

hi dear. Im hospitalised for the last few days due to an accident. I just logged in through my brother's laptop to ask a favour. Please can you watchlist the Gaga articles untill Wednesday? I'll be discharged by then. I guess you know the amount of crappy additions that goes in these articles (bio + songs + album + tour). Just for these few days only. Please. :( --Legolas ^(talk2me) 00:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just Like a pill

Hi mate, I was wondering if you would be able to dig out some more info on Just Like a Pill that I have been expanding over the last few days - just some more critical reception and writing/production info. Cheers. 03 md 21:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MJ

My heartiest condolescence to you my friend. I know you are on holiday but I just wanted to say Im so sorry and hope you are keeping well. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you come back soon my dear Carpet crawling friend. Its not the same without you here in Wikipedia. By the way, would you be interested in joining the Madonna wikiproject? --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MADGE

Hey. Please comment here. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OMG. You are back! I missed you so much. And congratulations on the job and the ...ahem.. girl. You finally got your chica! Things are wonderful here in wiki. I'm engrossed in the Madonna wikiproject now and developing more and more GAs. (If you could only see the nominations page. ) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding one of your GA Reviews

I've raised some concerns regarding one of your reviews at Talk:Post Oak Mall.--Crossmr (talk) 14:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Newsday

Hello, I saw via your talk page that you have full access to the Newsday archive? I am working mostly on Long Island related articles, and was hoping to see a few articles that I can only get to the abstract on. The articles are: LIVING IN / Rural Selden Putting on a New Face (May. 24, 1998), In the Middle of It All in Centereach / Affordable houses, plenty of playmates, Wal-Mart (Dec. 7, 1997), Centereach Changing Place, Changing People Series (Dec. 15, 1985), CORAM Lower prices, friendly neighbors make a first-time buyer's dream Series (Apr. 29, 1989). Any help you could lend or suggest would be great. Thanks. --Neighborhoodpalmreader (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hi

Hey hey hey. I'm absolutely fine! And kudos on you that you are doing these wonderful things in your life! How's everything coming along with the chica? About Madonna wikiproject it seems that I am the only one who is concerned at all about the state of the articles they are in. People are randomly adding shit in the articles. Prolific editors like Bookkeeper are only concerned with the biography article only. Hence, yeah it is kinda stressing me out! But oh well, I love doing it!! --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well well well. Looks like somebody remembered me! How very fortunate I am. It's good to see you back here. Hope everything is fine with your chica! Madonna and Lady Gaga articles are as exhaustive as they can be. Well nothing new with me. I am planning to shift to New York probably. ~~ 07:35, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Job related purposes. That would also mean that my time here on Wikipedia is totally gone. Wonder what would happen to the Madonna wikiproject. One question. Why did you decided to retire from here. I appreciate your work in Detective Conan, but you could shift between both. Like I do between Wikipedia nad pulsemusic. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A favour?

heya, how are you? i came across you whilst editing some of the phil collins articles and also noticed on your userpage that you (like me) are a big fan and like working on his stuff. i have been working on the Phil Collins discography and just wondered if you would take a looky if you had a chance? suggest some improvements and help me out with some music video director sources maybe? any help would be wicked :) Mister sparky (talk) 23:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hey

I've been doing good, how 'bout yourself? Yeah, it's been a long while. But, I knew that. ;) That sucks. I'm gonna miss you. Man, we never got to work on those song articles. Oh well. I haven't worked on a song article for quite sometime, so. I've been good, staying active here, and dealing with school. All is good, really. I hope you're doing good. I'm really gonna miss ya, but the outside life is calling, it's understandable. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

You are receiving this because you have commented on either Autogynephilia, Homosexual transsexual, or Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence theory in the past two years; all such commenters have received this notice. It has been proposed to merge these three articles to eliminate WP:Redundancy, WP:UNDUE, WP:POV, and to keep the focus on the specific Blanchardian theory of M2F transsexuality (in contrast to Transsexual sexuality, which would be to focus on the subject in general). Please feel free to comment on the proposal at Talk:Autogynephilia#Merger proposal. -- 70.57.222.103 (talk) 20:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".

Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).

Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:No Reply At All Single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:No Reply At All Single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of Gilpertpedon stand alone article

New Updates & Messages For Active Participants in the Marvel Comics work group

Current message (25/1/2020)

Greetings to you all & a great weekend. I took the iniative to send this mass message to you all because I observed from the article on Elders of the Universe that certain key members of the Elders of the Universe have no article of theirs and most glaring is that of Gilpertpedon/The Runner. I believe subject has become notable enough for a stand alone article & it would be a great idea for someone in possession of a picture of the runner which is their own work (as to avoid image copyright violations) to begin the article. Then the rest of us contribute to the article’s development.Celestina007 (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Action Requiring Urgent Attention

Greetings to you all & a great weekend to you all. I want to use this medium to remind us that certain imperative actions such as the under listed actions still need to be attended to

Review Category:Marvel Comics character stubs and merge to List of Marvel Comics characters as appropriate.
Review the image at Category:Comics images lacking original published source/Marvel to provide original publication source information (title, issue, cover date, artist(s))..
Collect categories, resource links, and templates.

And most imperative;

Recruit interested editors who have shown interest in our Marvel community.

Sent by Celestina007 on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Marvel Comics work group. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Separate Lives.jpg

The file File:Separate Lives.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Replaced by File:Separate Lives by Phil Collins and Marilyn Martin UK vinyl handwriting.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Separate Lives.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Separate Lives.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Both Sides of the Story.JPG

The file File:Both Sides of the Story.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Replaced by File:Both Sides of the Story by Phil Collins right side of face.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Both Sides of the Story.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Both Sides of the Story.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GAR on Chipotle Mexican Grill

Post Oak Mall, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Chuck E. Cheese

Chuck E. Cheese has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 07:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Stephanie McMahon

Stephanie McMahon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FreddieArgentinaCrop.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FreddieArgentinaCrop.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bad, Bad Leroy Brown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bad, Bad Leroy Brown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]