Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
| Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued November 4, 1992 Decided June 11, 1993 |
||||||
| Full case name | Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. and Ernesto Pichardo v. City of Hialeah | |||||
| Citations | 508 U.S. 520 (more) | |||||
| Prior history | Church of Lukumi v. City of Hialeah, 936 F.2d 586 (11th Cir. 1991) | |||||
| Holding | ||||||
| The states cannot restrict religiously-mandated ritual slaughter of animals, regardless of the purpose of the slaughter. | ||||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | Kennedy (Parts I, III, IV), joined by Rehnquist, White, Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Thomas | |||||
| Majority | Kennedy (II-B), joined by Rehnquist, White, Stevens, Scalia, Thomas | |||||
| Majority | Kennedy (Parts II-A-1, II-A-3), joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Thomas | |||||
| Concurrence | Kennedy (Part II-A-2), joined by Stevens | |||||
| Concurrence | Scalia (in part and judgment), joined by Rehnquist, Souter | |||||
| Concurrence | Blackmun (in judgment), joined by O'Connor | |||||
| Laws applied | ||||||
| U.S. Const. Free Exercise Clause, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, City of Hialeah Ordinances 87-52, 87-71, 87-72 | ||||||
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993),[1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held an ordinance passed in Hialeah, Florida that forbade the "unnecessar[y]" killing of "an animal in a public or private ritual or ceremony not for the primary purpose of food consumption." as unconstitutional. The law was enacted soon after the city council of Hialeah learned that the Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, which practiced Santería, was planning on locating there. Santeria is a religion practiced in the Americas by the descendants of Africans; many of its rituals involve animal sacrifice. The church filed a lawsuit in United States district court for the Southern District of Florida, seeking for the Hialeah ordinance to be declared unconstitutional.
Adhering to Employment Division v. Smith, the lower courts deemed the law to have a legitimate and rational government purpose and therefore upheld the enactment. The Supreme Court, however, held that the ordinances were neither neutral nor generally applicable: rather, they applied exclusively to the church. Because the law was targeted at Santería, the Court held, it was not subject to an undemanding rational basis test. Rather, the nature of the case was held to mandate a standard of strict scrutiny: state action had to be justified by a compelling governmental interest, and be narrowly tailored to advance that interest. Because the ordinance suppressed more religious conduct than was necessary to achieve its stated ends, it was deemed unconstitutional.
Contents |
[edit] See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 508
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
[edit] References
- ^ 508 U.S. 520 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah from the Cornell University Legal Information Institute.
[edit] Further reading
- Carter, Stephen L. (1993). "The Resurrection of Religious Freedom?". Harvard Law Review 107: 118.
- Doheny, Shannon L. (2006). "Free Exercise Does Not Protect Animal Sacrifice: The Misconception of Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah and Constitutional Solutions for Stopping Animal Sacrifice". Journal of Animal Law 2: 121.
- O'Brien, David M. (2004). Animal sacrifice and religious freedom: Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 0700613021.
- Palmie, Stephan. “Whose centre, whose margin? Notes towards an archaeology of US Supreme Court Case 91-948, 1993 Church of the Lukumi vs. City of Hialeah, South Florida,” in Inside and outside the law: anthropological studies of authority and ambiguity, ed. Olivia Harris (Routledge, 1996).
[edit] External links
- Text of Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993) is available from: Justia · Cornell