Narcissistic number
In recreational number theory, a narcissistic number[1][2] (also known as a pluperfect digital invariant (PPDI),[3] an Armstrong number[4] (after Michael F. Armstrong)[5] or a plus perfect number)[6] is a number that is the sum of its own digits each raised to the power of the number of digits. This definition depends on the base b of the number system used, e.g. b = 10 for the decimal system or b = 2 for the binary system.
The definition of a narcissistic number relies on the decimal representation n = dkdk-1...d1d0 of a natural number n, e.g.
- n = dk·10k-1 + dk-1·10k-2 + ... + d2·10 + d1,
with k digits di satisfying 0 ≤ di ≤ 9. Such a number n is called narcissistic if it satisfies the condition
- n = dkk + dk-1k + ... + d2k + d1k.
For example the 3-digit decimal number 153 is a narcissistic number because 153 = 13 + 53 + 33.
Narcissistic numbers can also be defined with respect to numeral systems with a base b other than b = 10. The base-b representation of a natural number n is defined by
- n = dkbk-1 + dk-1bk-2 + ... + d2b + d1,
where the base-b digits di satisfy the condition 0 ≤ di ≤ b-1. For example the (decimal) number 17 is a narcissistic number with respect to the numeral system with base b = 3. Its three base-3 digits are 122, because 17 = 1·32 + 2·3 + 2 , and it satisfies the equation 17 = 13 + 23 + 23.
If the constraint that the power must equal the number of digits is dropped, so that for some m possibly different from k it happens that
- n = dkm + dk-1m + ... + d2m + d1m,
then n is called a perfect digital invariant or PDI.[7][2] For example, the decimal number 4150 has four decimal digits and is the sum of the fifth powers of its decimal digits
- 4150 = 45 + 15 + 55 + 05,
so it is a perfect digital invariant but not a narcissistic number.
In "A Mathematician's Apology", G. H. Hardy wrote:
- There are just four numbers, after unity, which are the sums of the cubes of their digits:
- 153 = 13 + 53 + 33
- 370 = 33 + 73 + 03
- 371 = 33 + 73 + 13
- 407 = 43 + 03 + 73.
- These are odd facts, very suitable for puzzle columns and likely to amuse amateurs, but there is nothing in them which appeals to the mathematician.
Contents |
[edit] Narcissistic numbers in various bases
The sequence of "base 10" narcissistic numbers starts: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 153, 370, 371, 407, 1634, 8208, 9474 ... (sequence A005188 in OEIS)
The sequence of "base 3" narcissistic numbers starts: 0, 1, 2, 12, 122
The sequence of "base 4" narcissistic numbers starts: 0, 1, 2, 3, 313
The number of narcissistic numbers in a given base is finite, since the maximum possible sum of the kth powers of a k digit number in base b is
and if k is large enough then
in which case no base b narcissistic number can have k or more digits. Setting b equal to 10 shows that the largest narcissistic number in base 10 must be less than 1060.[1]
There are only 88 narcissistic numbers in base 10, of which the largest is
- 115,132,219,018,763,992,565,095,597,973,971,522,401
with 39 digits.[1]
Unlike narcissistic numbers, no upper bound can be determined for the size of PDIs in a given base, and it is not currently known whether or not the number of PDIs for an arbitrary base is finite or infinite.[2]
[edit] Related concepts
The term "narcissistic number" is sometimes used in a wider sense to mean a number that is equal to any mathematical manipulation of its own digits. With this wider definition narcisstic numbers include:
- Constant base numbers :
for some m. - Perfect digit-to-digit invariants (sequence A046253 in OEIS) :

- Ascending power numbers (sequence A032799 in OEIS) :

- Friedman numbers (sequence A036057 in OEIS).
- Sum-product numbers (sequence A038369 in OEIS) :

- Dudeney numbers (sequence A061209 in OEIS) :

- Factorions (sequence A014080 in OEIS) :

where di are the digits of n in some base.
[edit] References
- ^ a b c Weisstein, Eric W., "Narcissistic Number" from MathWorld.
- ^ a b c Perfect and PluPerfect Digital Invariants by Scott Moore
- ^ PPDI (Armstrong) Numbers by Harvey Heinz
- ^ Armstrong Numbersl by Dik T. Winter
- ^ Lionel Deimel’s Web Log
- ^ (sequence A005188 in OEIS)
- ^ PDIs by Harvey Heinz
- Joseph S. Madachy, Mathematics on Vacation, Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd. 1966, pages 163-175.
- Perfect Digital Invariants by Walter Schneider
- On a curious property of 3435 by Daan van Berkel


for some m.



