In mathematics, especially in combinatorics, Stirling numbers of the first kind arise in the study of permutations. In particular, the Stirling numbers of the first kind count permutations according to their number of cycles (counting fixed points as cycles of length one).
The Stirling numbers of the first and second kind can be understood as inverses of one another when viewed as triangular matrices. This article is devoted to specifics of Stirling numbers of the first kind. Identities linking the two kinds appear in the article on Stirling numbers in general.
Definitions
The original definition of Stirling numbers of the first kind was algebraic:[citation needed] they are the coefficients in the expansion of the falling factorial
into powers of the variable :
For example, , leading to the values , , and .
Subsequently, it was discovered that the absolute values of these numbers are equal to the number of permutations of certain kinds. These absolute values, which are known as unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind, are often denoted or . They may be defined directly to be the number of permutations of elements with disjoint cycles. For example, of the permutations of three elements, there is one permutation with three cycles (the identity permutation, given in one-line notation by or in cycle notation by ), three permutations with two cycles (, , and ) and two permutations with one cycle ( and ). Thus, , and . These can be seen to agree with the previous calculation of for .
It was observed by Alfréd Rényi that the unsigned Stirling number also count the number
of permutations of size with left-to-right maxima.[1]
The unsigned Stirling numbers may also be defined algebraically, as the coefficients of the rising factorial:
.
The notations used on this page for Stirling numbers are not universal, and may conflict with notations in other sources. (The square bracket notation is also common notation for the Gaussian coefficients.)
Definition by permutation
can be defined as the number of permutations on elements with cycles.
The image at right shows that : the symmetric group on 4 objects has 3 permutations of the form
(having 2 orbits, each of size 2),
and 8 permutations of the form
(having 1 orbit of size 3 and 1 orbit of size 1).
Signs
The signs of the (signed) Stirling numbers of the first kind are predictable and depend on the parity of n − k. In particular,
Recurrence relation
The unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind can be calculated by the recurrence relation
for , with the initial conditions
for .
It follows immediately that the (signed) Stirling numbers of the first kind satisfy the recurrence
.
Algebraic proof
We prove the recurrence relation using the definition of Stirling numbers in terms of rising factorials. Distributing the last term of the product, we have
The coefficient of on the left-hand side of this equation is . The coefficient of in is , while the coefficient of in is . Since the two sides are equal as polynomials, the coefficients of on both sides must be equal, and the result follows.
Combinatorial proof
We prove the recurrence relation using the definition of Stirling numbers in terms of permutations with a given number of cycles (or equivalently, orbits).
Consider forming a permutation of objects from a permutation of objects by adding a distinguished object. There are exactly two ways in which this can be accomplished. We could do this by forming a singleton cycle, i.e., leaving the extra object alone. This increases the number of cycles by 1 and so accounts for the term in the recurrence formula. We could also insert the new object into one of the existing cycles. Consider an arbitrary permutation of objects with cycles, and label the objects , so that the permutation is represented by
To form a new permutation of objects and cycles one must insert the new object into this array. There are ways to perform this insertion, inserting the new object immediately following any of the already present. This explains the term of the recurrence relation. These two cases include all possibilities, so the recurrence relation follows.
Table of values
Below is a triangular array of unsigned values for the Stirling numbers of the first kind, similar in form to Pascal's triangle. These values are easy to generate using the recurrence relation in the previous section.
These identities may be derived by enumerating permutations directly.
For example, a permutation of n elements with n − 3 cycles must have one of the following forms:
n − 6 fixed points and three two-cycles
n − 5 fixed points, a three-cycle and a two-cycle, or
n − 4 fixed points and a four-cycle.
The three types may be enumerated as follows:
choose the six elements that go into the two-cycles, decompose them into two-cycles and take into account that the order of the cycles is not important:
choose the five elements that go into the three-cycle and the two-cycle, choose the elements of the three-cycle and take into account that three elements generate two three-cycles:
choose the four elements of the four-cycle and take into account that four elements generate six four-cycles:
Sum the three contributions to obtain
Note that all the combinatorial proofs above use either binomials or multinomials of .
Therefore if is prime, then:
for .
Other relations
Expansions for fixed k
Since the Stirling numbers are the coefficients of a polynomial with roots 0, 1, ..., n − 1, one has by Vieta's formulas that
In other words, the Stirling numbers of the first kind are given by elementary symmetric polynomials evaluated at 0, 1, ..., n − 1.[3] In this form, the simple identities given above take the form
and so on.
One may produce alternative forms for the Stirling numbers of the first kind with a similar approach preceded by some algebraic manipulation: since
For fixed these weighted harmonic number expansions are generated by the generating function
where the notation means extraction of the coefficient of from the following formal power series (see the non-exponential Bell polynomials and section 3 of [5]).
More generally, sums related to these weighted harmonic number expansions of the Stirling numbers of the first kind can be defined through generalized zeta series transforms of generating functions.[6][7]
One can also "invert" the relations for these Stirling numbers given in terms of the -order harmonic numbers to write the integer-order generalized harmonic numbers in terms of weighted sums of terms involving the Stirling numbers of the first kind. For example, when the second-order and third-order harmonic numbers are given by
More generally, one can invert the Bell polynomial generating function for the Stirling numbers expanded in terms of the -order harmonic numbers to obtain that for integers
Other related formulas involving the falling factorials, Stirling numbers of the first kind, and in some cases Stirling numbers of the second kind include the following:[9]
Inversion relations and the Stirling transform
For any pair of sequences, and , related by a finite sum Stirling number formula given by
for all integers , we have a corresponding inversion formula for given by
A variety of identities may be derived by manipulating the generating function:
Using the equality
it follows that
(This identity is valid for formal power series, and the sum converges in the complex plane for |z| < 1.) Other identities arise by exchanging the order of summation, taking derivatives, making substitutions for z or u, etc. For example, we may derive:[14]
where is the gamma function. There also exist more complicated expressions for the zeta-functions involving the Stirling numbers. One, for example, has
This series generalizes Hasse's series for the Hurwitz zeta-function (we obtain Hasse's series by setting k=1).[15][16]
We can also apply the saddle point asymptotic methods from Temme's article [18] to obtain other estimates for the Stirling numbers of the first kind. These estimates are more involved and complicated to state. Nonetheless, we provide an example.
In particular, we define the log gamma function, , whose higher-order derivatives are given in terms of polygamma functions as
where we consider the (unique) saddle point of the function to be the solution of when . Then for and the constants
we have the following asymptotic estimate as :
Finite sums
Since permutations are partitioned by number of cycles, one has
The table in section 6.1 of Concrete Mathematics provides a plethora of generalized forms of finite sums involving the Stirling numbers. Several particular finite sums relevant to this article include
Other finite sum identities involving the signed Stirling numbers of the first kind found, for example, in the NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Section 26.8) include the following sums:[19]
we arrive at the following identity related to the form of the Stirling convolution polynomials which can be employed to generalize both Stirling number triangles to arbitrary real, or complex-valued, values of the input :
Particular expansions of the previous identity lead to the following identities expanding the Stirling numbers of the first kind for the first few small values of :
Software tools for working with finite sums involving Stirling numbers and Eulerian numbers are provided by the RISC Stirling.m package utilities in Mathematica. Other software packages for guessing formulas for sequences (and polynomial sequence sums) involving Stirling numbers and other special triangles is available for both Mathematica and Sagehere and here, respectively.[21]
Furthermore, infinite series involving the finite sums with the Stirling numbers often lead to the special functions. For example[14][22]
Another exact nested sum expansion for these Stirling numbers is computed by elementary symmetric polynomials corresponding to the coefficients in of a product of the form . In particular, we see that
Newton's identities combined with the above expansions may be used to give an alternate proof of the weighted expansions involving the generalized harmonic numbers already noted above.
Another explicit formula for reciprocal powers of n is given by the following identity for integers :[24]
Notice that this last identity immediately implies relations between the polylogarithm functions, the Stirling number exponential generating functions given above, and the Stirling-number-based power series for the generalized Nielsen polylogarithm functions.
Relations to natural logarithm function
The nth derivative of the μth power of the natural logarithm involves the signed Stirling numbers of the first kind:
There are many notions of generalized Stirling numbers that may be defined (depending on application) in a number of differing combinatorial contexts. In so much as the Stirling numbers of the first kind correspond to the coefficients of the distinct polynomial expansions of the single factorial function, , we may extend this notion to define triangular recurrence relations for more general classes of products.
In particular, for any fixed arithmetic function and symbolic parameters , related generalized factorial products of the form
may be studied from the point of view of the classes of generalized Stirling numbers of the first kind defined by the following coefficients of the powers of in the expansions of and then by the next corresponding triangular recurrence relation:
These coefficients satisfy a number of analogous properties to those for the Stirling numbers of the first kind as well as recurrence relations and functional equations related to the f-harmonic numbers, .[25]
for integers and where whenever or . In this sense, the form of the Stirling numbers of the first kind may also be generalized by this parameterized super-recurrence for fixed scalars (not all zero).
^Schmidt, M. D. (30 October 2016). "Zeta Series Generating Function Transformations Related to Polylogarithm Functions and the k-Order Harmonic Numbers". arXiv:1610.09666 [math.CO].
^
Schmidt, M. D. (3 November 2016). "Zeta Series Generating Function Transformations Related to Generalized Stirling Numbers and Partial Sums of the Hurwitz Zeta Function". arXiv:1611.00957 [math.CO].
^See Table 265 (Section 6.1) of the Concrete Mathematics reference.
^Concrete Mathematics exercise 13 of section 6. Note that this formula immediately implies the first positive-order Stirling number transformation given in the main article on generating function transformations.
^Olver, Frank; Lozier, Daniel; Boisvert, Ronald; Clark, Charles (2010). "NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions". Nist Handbook of Mathematical Functions. (Section 26.8)
^ abIa. V. Blagouchine (2016). "Two series expansions for the logarithm of the gamma function involving Stirling numbers and containing only rational coefficients for certain arguments related to π−1". Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 442 (2): 404–434. arXiv:1408.3902. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.04.032. S2CID119661147. arXiv
^See also some more interesting series representations and expansions mentioned in Connon's article: Connon, D. F. (2007). "Some series and integrals involving the Riemann zeta function, binomial coefficients and the harmonic numbers (Volume I)". arXiv:0710.4022 [math.HO]..
^These estimates are found in Section 26.8 of the NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions.
^The first identity below follows as a special case of the Bell polynomial identity found in section 4.1.8 of S. Roman's The Umbral Calculus where , though several other related formulas for the Stirling numbers defined in this manner are derived similarly.
^A table of the second-order Eulerian numbers and a synopsis of their properties is found in section 6.2 of Concrete Mathematics. For example, we have that . These numbers also have the following combinatorial interpretation: If we form all permutations of the multiset with the property that all numbers between the two occurrences of are greater than for , then is the number of such permutations that have ascents.
^Schmidt, M. D. (2016). "A Computer Algebra Package for Polynomial Sequence Recognition". arXiv:1609.07301 [math.CO].
M. Abramowitz, I. Stegun, ed. (1972). "§24.1.3. Stirling Numbers of the First Kind". Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (9th ed.). New York: Dover. p. 824.