User talk:Karthickbala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Karthickbala! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shyamal (talk) 03:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Taxonomic controversy[edit]

If you want to see real taxonomic controversy see Talk:Bengalia, esp. the history ! It is interesting that scientists often come here only to do the fire fighting rather than avoiding it by educating the public (and professional scientists - who often think they are beyond learning) in the first place ! Shyamal (talk) 03:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

H P Gandhi[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of H P Gandhi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/sahyadri_enews/newsletter/issue26/article2/art2.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of an article under this name has been blocked because it had been created, deleted, and twice re-created, each time using the copyrighted text found here (language which was grossly inappropriate anyway). If you feel this person is genuinely notable, I suggest you create a new, non-copyright-violating, non-promotional article under H. P. Gandhi (with the full stops), which would have been the proper name anyway. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A first sketch of an article has been created at H. P. Gandhi. Please read our guidelines on such topics as neutral point of view, to avoid creating a hagiograpy; and our guidelines on citations, to lead you in adding additional sources to the single weak source currently provided. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The bibliography was the least important thing you could have added. We need a clear outline of his life: the schools he attended and taught at, etc. (The old article was filled with abbreviations and the like.) We need some evidence (not merely bald assertions) as to the importance of his career, with links to articles about him as opposed to by him, to establish notability. The bibliography needs reformatting, too; journal titles are not italicized, there are no wikilinks to journals which have Wikipedia articles about them, etc. Is there an article about Gandhi in the Gujarati Wikipedia with useful information? --Orange Mike | Talk 18:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ltte soldier killed by cw.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ltte soldier killed by cw.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indian rhinoceros[edit]

Hi. I notice you have included demographic info in the Wikipedia article “Indian Rhinoceros”. The table might need updating. There are changes in all three populations of rhinoceroses in Nepal; severe declines due to poaching have been reported: the Bardia population is down to around 30 individuals; the Chitwan population has fallen to 372 in 2005, and was estimated at 408 in March 2008 – but poaching is continuing again.

http://www.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/nepal/news/?19834/Nepals-endangered-rhinos-down-a-third-since-2000

http://www.rhinos-irf.org/en/art/475/

http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jun2006/2006-06-01-02.asp

http://www.forestrynepal.org/article/news/411

http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/media/press/2007/WWFPresitem6295.html

http://www.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/nepal/news/?104500/Only-31-Rhinos-in-Bardia-National-Park

And some good news:

http://www.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/nepal/news/?78120/Political-Parties-Maoists-and-the-people-of-Chitwan-unite-to-save-the-rhino

http://www.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/nepal/news/?87800/Sign-on-to-Save-the-Rhino


Best regards Belsavis (talk) 11:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Jegath Gaspar.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jegath Gaspar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Bangalore/Bangalore4[edit]

Hope you have seen this note. Wonder if you and some other folks at CES might be interested. Shyamal (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Karthickbala! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Dennis B. McGilvray - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiProject Tamil Civilizations[edit]

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Tamil civilization. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Tamil related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.

Twitter status message Template[edit]

This is a template to generate a direct link to the Twitter status message. You can use this template to navigate directly to the Tweet or to refer someone directly to any Tweet in your wiki. You can use this template freely wherever you need to refer any tweets/twitter users of Twitter#Features for your external references or some other places. --Jenith Michael Raj (talk) 06:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Twitter_status

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited H. P. Gandhi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wilson College and Pratapgarh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited The Bridge on the River Kwai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Hello Karthickbala. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Western Ghats, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Please go through WP:NOTRS and in general, please read WP:V and WP:RS — Abhishek  Talk 16:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abhishek, edits I made in Western Ghats page is neither have distorted view nor a unreliable information. It is just a report of descriptions of new algal species from Western Ghats. It is same as report of new amphibians in fauna section of the same article. Me being the author does not mean that it is distorted. I have made many of these kind of edits in article related to diatoms, new species description and Western Ghats in Tamil and English Wikis. Let me know if you need any more clarifications. Thanks--Karthickbala (talk) 16:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have a conflict of interest with the article and my message above clearly explains why your edit was reverted. — Abhishek  Talk 16:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See you at the Wiknic tomorrow![edit]

Hi there! I didn't know there was another Wikipedian at the CU Museum! I'm looking forward to meeting you at the Boulder Wiknic tomorrow! -- Gaurav (talk) 02:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Karthickbala. You have new messages at Abhishek191288's talk page.
Message added 18:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Abhishek  Talk 18:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Terribly short notice: Boulder WLM on 15 September[edit]

Apologies for getting this out so late, but this is all Pharos' fault. Please blame everything on Pharos.

That said, this message is just to let you know that we're having a photo hunt for Wiki Loves Monuments at 11:00 in the morning of Saturday the 15th in Boulder, probably somewhere around CU, though the exact location hasn't yet been decided. Since you have previously attended or expressed interest in other meetups in the area, hopefully you might be able to come.

Please sign up as soon as possible if you're interested; we'd love to have you along to help postpone the squirrel apocalypse. Or at least get some decent images. -— Isarra ༆ 05:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gene Stoermer concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gene Stoermer, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Gene Stoermer (August 21)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LukeSurl t c 12:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Karthickbala, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gene Stoermer concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gene Stoermer, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gene Stoermer concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gene Stoermer, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Karthickbala. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Karthickbala. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Karthickbala&oldid=1143106776"