User talk:Portlannd

July 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to List of ski areas and resorts in Europe has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of ski areas and resorts in Europe was changed by Portlannd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855506 on 2013-07-19T18:35:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kopaonik may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[http://www.serbski.com British site promotion of Kopaonik

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Our Lady of Snow ecumenic Church[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Our Lady of Snow ecumenic Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.easteuropeangateway.com/index.php?p=5_143. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Belgrade Cathedral[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Belgrade Cathedral requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 115ash^→(☏) 10:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image sizes[edit]

I see you have added a lot of images to the Serbia article using px sizes.
I have removed the sizes and added "upright" to the upright images. The reason for doing this is that people look at Wikipedia on a wide variety of screens from wall-sized, to desktop, tablet and phone. They can set their preferred size for thumbnail images in Preferences > Appearance > Files, so someone using a large screen can choose larger thumbnail images, while those using a small screen can choose smaller thumbnail images. Files with fixed sizes appear that size, so may be much smaller than the reader wants if they are using a large screen, or much larger than they want if using a small screen. For this reason we do not normally set a px size.

The specific guidance is at Wikipedia:Image use policy specifically the section WP:THUMBSIZE which states:-

syntax such as thumb|300px simply sets a fixed image width, ignoring the user's base preference. In general, do not use px without very good reason; upright=scaling factor is preferred wherever sensible.

Where px is used, the resulting image should be no more than 500 pixels tall and no more than 400 pixels wide, for comfortable display on the smallest devices in common use.

- Arjayay (talk) 17:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, tnank you.I have to learn how to properly do. --Portlannd (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem:- Arjayay (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vojvodjanski magazin[edit]

The article Vojvodjanski magazin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

May not be notable. Could not find any thing worth in Google. Please add references if notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Portlannd. You have new messages at Talk:Serbia.
Message added 01:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 01:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Belgrade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Portlannd. You have new messages at Talk:Serbia.
Message added 22:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vasa's Torte[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vasa's Torte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from Directly translated from http://www.hranazadusu.com/KAKO-JE-NASTALA-VASINA-TORTA/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Vanjagenije (talk) 22:23, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vukovar may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] became the site of great conflict and interest of powerful states of that time. At that time [[Croats begin to inhabit this area. The preserved documents mention Vukovar in the early [[13th
important collections included the items excavated at the [[archaeological site]] Vučedol and the [[Culture and History Collection, which contained documents, furniture, and pieces of art, and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Country maps - WP:WATERMARK[edit]

Hello Portlannd, please don't add watermarked or credited maps (or other images) to Wikipedia articles. See WP:WATERMARK for more information. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 16:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

and in any case do not mass add maps to multiple articles without clear consensus that those specific maps add relevant information.

in addition the choice of cities in the Netherlands maps seems fairly random as many province capitals are missing, while minor cities with less population than those province capitals are shown. What are the exact criteria for adding the cities (cannot be governmental relevance cannot be population)? Similarly on the France map, Bordeaux is not shown while the nearby much much smaller Limoges is, why is Caen shown but the close by much larger capital of Bretagne: Rennes is not. Who has decided on which cities to list? Since you place these maps please give us the exact rationale for above choices for cities to show. Without that these maps are utterly worthless. Arnoutf (talk) 17:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Serbia page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 24 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Serbia page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pag. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image edits at Serbia[edit]

Hi! Please, do not take this too offensive, but I think that your edits at "Serbia" are disruptive. You keep adding and changing images every day without discussing it on the talk page and without leaving WP:edit summaries. The Serbia article is very busy article, and controversial changes should not be made without discussing them first and reaching consensus with other editor. I know that you just want the article to look good, but the way you are doing that is disruptive. I propose you not to make any image-related edit at the Serbia article (and also Croatia, Belgrade and any other article) before discussing the intended edit with other editors at the talk page and reaching WP:consensus. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes , I am very persistent guy.Serbia is a very divided society and for every picture I have to consider whether they are sufficiently represented one of the two existing ideology .If you leave out one , the other side being aggressive .For example,mentioning President Tito , a communist , a Second World War , etc. And on the other nationalist and pro-Western part of the state , also each image must be such that it does not go in conflict with pages of other states of the former Yugoslavia. I'm sorry, but all around us is the policy and must find a balance in order not to go into the feelings of the people . --Portlannd (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am just asking from you to discuss those edits with other editors on the talk page before you make them. You don't own that article or any other. Your consistent everyday editing of images without any discussion and without edit summary is very disruptive. Take this as a friendly advice: don't make any edits to that page before discussing them on the talk page. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Srbija, Srbija[edit]

Ranija ukazivanja na engleskom ti očigledno ništa ne znače, pa ćemo ovako. - Prestani sa masovnim dodavanjem slika na stranici, možda misliš da si anđeo čuvar, promoter nekakve jednakosti ali dobro nikako ne činiš. Tvojim potezima pretvaraš ranije sveden i sasvim solidan članak u slikovnicu za decu, postižući ništa drugo do kontraefekat. Inače, svrha slika je prikaz najvažnijih delova teksta, da li razumeš? Prelaziš svaku granicu dobrog ukusa. Svako naredno "uređivanje" članka u sličnom maniru ću proslediti administratorima, što može rezultirati trajnim banovanjem IP adrese.

Mm.srb (talk)

Kad ti očigledno uporno brišeš, raspored slika i slike koje sam stavio nitko nije ni taknuo ali vidim tebi smetaju, takodje gledao sam da izgled radim onako kako rade za druge države, tu bi trebalo dodati bar još nekoliko primer karti zbog granica koje je Srbija menjala milion puta, takodje prosek slika je na drugim stranicama oko 50 - 60 , što ovaj članak o Srbiji nema ni približno. Takodje sam lično smanjio broj slika gradova sa 8 na 4 , tako da, ne pravi se pametan i poštuj tuđi rad. Da li imaš oči izabrao si najružniju sliku crkve na Tekijama i uporno stavljaš slike koje su tmurne i slabo se vide, stavi naočare i smiri se malo. Nemoj da ti budeš banovan zbog drskog ponašanja. Umesto pretnji, bolji je dogovor zar ne. Slike se retko menjaju, ali ako umesto mutne imaš šansu da staviš neku novu koju je neko postavio skoro, što da ne. Vidiš da sam stavio sliku vaterpolo reprezentacije od skora kada su osvojili zlato u Kazanu, ili, umesto slike gde se vidi jedan jadan Štadler voz staviš noviju na kojoj ih je nekoliko. Spustimo loptu, dogovor. --Portlannd (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nije "taknuo" sada, ali mnogi ranije jesu, pošto ljudi lako dižu ruke pred naletima tvrdoglavosti ovog tipa. Članak Bugarske je recimo za uzor (zbog čega i ima naznačen status), dok BiH - nije. Kod njih postoji obilje slika i izgleda groteskno. Ne treba se porediti sa drugima na taj način, princip je jasan; More is less. Poštujem tuđi, konkretan rad ali ne vidim poboljšanje, prema tome... Ne sećam se slike o kojoj govoriš, niti je uostalom bitno, svakako nisam stavljao fajl slabijg kvaliteta - ako je već bilo boljeg. Dalje, ovo nije pretnja već insisiranje na poštovanju pravila, a jednosmereno uređivanje prema sopstvenim nahođenjima i parametrima nije ništa drugo do kršenja pravila i konačno, suprotno duhu sajta. Za apdejtovanje se, naravno, slažem. Mm.srb (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nećeš verovati ali od 5 članaka jedan je baš bio i članak Bugarske, i države , ali konkretnije grada Sofije kada sam uredjivao Bg. Vidi, sve što sada vidiš na Serbia, raspored slika barokne slike istorije sam postavio ja, takodje članak nije imao informacije state division, niti mapu, niti podele države na regione, pre oko godinu dana članak Serbia bio je nevidljiv skroz bez puno informacija a kamoli tek slika. Mislim što se tiče slika da stvarno ne postavljam mnogo, niti ostale kolege uz to ih ponekad prebrojim da viim da li broj stoji sa drugim člancima o drugim zemljama. Ali složićeš se da je bolje staviti sliku Srpskog ustanka, nego samo sliku recimo kneza Miloša ili Karadjordja jer je ovo oopisno značajnije uz to je jedan od njih dvojice na slici borbe, dok sa druge strane ako postoji slika predsednika Tita, onda je nužno da stavim i sliku bar dvojice važnih vladara Srbije pre komunizma a u dobu poslednje kraljevine jer je period istorije pre komunizma ipak mnogo duži, ako stavim recimo Pašića, onda je nužno da bar jedan od kraljeva iz novije istorije bude u članku, morao sam staviti Aleksandra, bez obzira sta mislio o njemu, on se prosto izdvojio u trenutku istorije. Nakon njega prirodno ide Tito, itd. Mislim da stvarno nema preterivanja, samo sam smatrao da su ljudi pre svega vizualna bića te sam hteo da se kroz pojedine slike može i doživeti odredjeni period istorije recimo u tom delu. Seti se , pomenuo sam ti stavio sam pre oko god dana novi okvir za gradove kako bih smanjio upravo i broj slika , u onom okviru bilo ih je osam čak, smatrao sam da nismo turistička sila i primetio da drzave koje se ne bave uglavnom turizmom, a Srbija spada u te, imaju dve ili 4 u opisu broja stanovnika gradova. Bilo bi stvarno super da se svi lepo dogovorimo, a jeste važno da se retko kada šta menja to prosto nije potrebno. Recimo u članku Beograd menjati glavnu sliku, odnosno montage na početku, dok se recimo ne završi neki projekat u gradu nešto novo to mi je skroz ok. I na žalost užasno sam tvrdoglava osoba, ali radim na tome, menjam se. --Portlannd (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia[edit]

I have removed part of your addition to the above article, as it appears to have been directly copied from http://www.srbija.gov.rs/pages/article.php?id=5412&change_lang=en, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I may have made a mistake. — Diannaa (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Network. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vukovar

added links pointing to Serbian, Arcades, Avars, Bobota and Bijelo Brdo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Repeated COPYVIO edits over more than two years. Thank you. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:41, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why Im blocked ? Can you help me please ? --Portlannd (talk) 12:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to file an unblock request using the instructions above. In particular, we will need to see you understand the copyright violation policy. You should bear in mind that Wikipedia uses a specific license; anything you write here can be reused, printed as a book, and sold for $250 on eBay (it's not exactly a good business idea, but it is allowed!) and most "free" websites do not operate that way, so we can't use them. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Portlannd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]