User talk:Vartmaan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Intent Leadership for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intent Leadership is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intent Leadership until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Vartmaan, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Rosiestep (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous
Teahouse logo
Hello! Vartmaan, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Vaartman.

We are not for the promotion of ideas. The content of the article must be encyclopedic, and more to the point, must meet our general notability requirements. This does not appear to do so, and this is why I put it up for deletion discussion.

With your post, then, it appears you may have a conflict of interest insofar as the content is concerned; I highly recommend you review this article, as well, in order that you come to an understanding as to why this is considered a problem.

--Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Next What's In.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Next What's In.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. noq (talk) 21:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFD for Intent Leadership - comments that are best left off the AFD[edit]

If you'll forgive me for a moment, I see you, unintentionally so, following a different rule we have here on Wikipedia: ignoring the rules. In a few cases, this is one we invoke with good measure, but we also limit our use of it because it is not carte blanche for something of this nature - among other things that ignoring the rules does not mean. In a nutshell, this is not one of the rare times to ignore the rules.

I, for one, do not believe that doing this makes you a generally bad person - if anything, I see you as a bit innocent of the way we do things here at Wikipedia. But do understand that we have strong reasons for these guidelines, and the vast majority of us do recognize when it's time to step out of the box.

In any event, as any article must be able to stand up by itself, independent of its primary source (in this case, intent leadership from the book that promotes it), I stand by my statements. The trick, if you wish to save this article from deletion, is to prove that intent leadership, as a concept, is notable in and of itself - that is, entirely independent of the book. Admittedly, with such a novel concept, I think that this will be difficult at this point in time - and there is no way of predicting if this will be so notable in the future. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Hiya- I took a look at the sources and it looks like the first one [1] is already being used on the article, so I didn't need to add this one. The problems with the second and third links ([2], [3]) is that they're just brief promotional blurbs for the article, which can't be used as a source. Adding them at this point would really only hurt the article more than help it since it'd look like we're grasping at straws. At the most they'd be considered trivial sources, which can't show notability. Right now it's best to keep the articles here to the more in-depth ones. I do have a question: do you know if there's any articles in any other languages? If so, those can be used here on Wikipedia. Not all of the sources have to be in English in order to show notability, so if you know of any other articles we can use them as long as they're considered to be from reliable sources. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or to visit Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. This is a board where you can post questions about various sources and have them answered by various different people. I know I've posted on there many times asking for help, so I highly recommend it! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help request[edit]

Need a deletion review for the article Santosh Sharma and Dissolve the box. I am new to wikipedia and it would be great to have your guidance--Vartmaan (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't offer any guidance, but here's a link to WP:Deletion review. I recommend that you read the "What is this page for?" and Instructions sections before deciding to file. DoriTalkContribs 03:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Vartmaan. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
Message added 22:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]