Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests/Archive 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Class:  Featured article

Action required: Correction to map.

Comments: The M-6 map was created in 2006 using the GIS data available at the time. A recent conversation with an official MDOT brought to my attention that west of the 8th Avenue interchange in Ottawa County, M-6 turns northward and not northwestward to intersect I-196. Please create a map with an inset to replace File:Michigan 6 map.png before November 20 (UTC) because M-6 is going to be the TFA on the Main Page on that date. Imzadi 1979  23:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 05:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Class:  Featured article

Action required: New map

Comments: Can someone make a new map, perhaps with an inset that shows M-554 as well as M-553. I'm looking at merging the two together in the near future, and it would be nice to have an updated map to reflect the merger. Imzadi 1979  15:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

@Imzadi1979: I added M-554 to M-553's KML by going off of the description in the article. Can you verify if it's correct? –Fredddie 14:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
@Fredddie: it looks right to me. Imzadi 1979  14:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Status: {{Done}} –Fredddie 21:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Class:  Good article

Action required: New map

Comments: New GA that needs a map. Rschen7754 19:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 04:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Class:  C-Class article

Action required: New map

Comments: The article needs a map, as it was requested at it's Good Article Nomination. Thanks to whoever decided to make the map. - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 04:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 04:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

RM 1832 needs a map. Highwayboy (talk) 16:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

{{not done}} This hasn't been answered in four years, and the article is eventually going to be folded into a list. –Fredddie 02:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Basically a straight route up in the middle of Missouri. Thanks --intelatitalk 21:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

{{Done}} –Fredddie 03:28, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Class:  B-Class article

Action required: Correction to existing map (File:Texas 130 map.svg)

Comments: The map needs to be corrected to show the October 2012 extension. --Kinu t/c 21:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 03:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Class:  Good article

Action required: Correction to existing map

Comments: The current info map highlights the lower level roadway from mile post 0 to 1.45. The red highlighting should continue east where Rte 139 runs concurrently with I-78 along 14th and 12th streets and into the Holland Tunnel until the NY state line at mile post 2.77. If possible, there is also a small leg of the upper level roadway (Rte 139U) at its western terminus that should be red highlighted. This missing leg starts at intersection of John F. Kennedy Boulevard and Hoboken Avenue and continues just past Collard Street, where Hoboken Avenue then runs directly over the lower roadway.Wondering55 (talk) 01:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Status: {{not done}} The current map is correct. –Fredddie 23:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

The article for Florida's Veterans Expressway/Suncoast Parkway really could use a map. If somebody could fix one up for it, it would be greatly appreciated. - The Bushranger (talk) 05:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

{{done}} both. –Fredddie 06:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Class:  Featured article

Action required: I need a city map of Grand Rapids c. 1962 to satisfy a concern from the FAC. Some speed would be appreciated with this request. Update the FAC passed long ago, but it would still be nice to create the map requested rather than rely on on a MSHD map inset from 1957.

Comments: Imzadi 1979  01:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Status: New request

Can data be found to action this request? --Rschen7754 16:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
I can supply a scanned copy of the appropriate city inset for replication, however any MSHD maps starting in 1958 and later are under copyright. Imzadi 1979  21:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Class:  Good article

Action required: New Map

Comments: A map of this road would certainly help propel it to GA status once completed. -DyluckTRocket (talk) 04:44, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Status: {{Done}} –Fredddie 05:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Copied from Old Court Road

Class:  Start-Class article

Action required: Correction to existing map

Comments: Copied and pasted here for greater visibility. –Fredddie
The image for this article incorrectly shows MD 125 extending east to MD 26/Liberty Road, when, in fact, it ends a few miles west of MD 26 (per the text of the article). I'd change the image, but, unfortunatly, it is in a raster format, instead of a vector format, which makes any changes messy. Does anyone know if there is an SVG version of it available? SixSix (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 21:46, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Class:  Good article

Action required: Correction to existing map

Comments: The northern terminus of MD 355 was truncated to I-70/US 40. Dough4872 03:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 07:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Class:  C-Class article
  • Action required: Correction to existing KML file?
  • Comments: CA 91's westernmost segment between CA 1 and Vermont Ave/I-110 was relinquished to local control, and no longer part of a state highway -- in other words, the highway's official western terminus is now at Vermont Ave/I-110. This content is reflecting in the prose of the article. The map file File:California State Route 91.svg indicates the relinquished segment in pink while the official segment is in red, but there is no such distinction in the KML file. This may be confusing to readers when sources like Google Maps also do not currently mark this segment as part of CA 91, but other sources like Bing Maps currently do (for example, compare various maps at 33°52′22″N 118°20′31″W / 33.87284°N 118.34201°W / 33.87284; -118.34201 (CA 91) where the relinquished segment intersects with I-405). Thus, what is the best course of action to take? Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:48, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
  • KML: Yes Template:Attached KML/California State Route_91
  • Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 00:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

If a map could be created for this route it would be much appreciated! Thanks, Ngs61 (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Moved as a B-class article. --Rschen7754 23:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

{{done}} File:New York State Route 130 Map.svg Chinissai (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

As an aside, the geographic context issue has quieted considerably since we started adding KMLs to articles, but I agree with you overall. –Fredddie 22:21, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, the map is totally useless in its current form IMHO. --AdmrBoltz 22:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Class:  Start-Class article

Action required: New map

Comments: Needs a map --Tomtomn00 (talkcontributions) 09:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Stubs are the lowest priority around here. We have GAs that lack maps, and they'd take some priority over articles that aren't yet C-Class. Imzadi 1979  22:55, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
This highway is not shown in the road data I have, so a KML is necessary. –Fredddie 03:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I can probably have that done within the next couple hours. TCN7JM 04:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
@Fredddie: I've fixed the KML. Here it is. TCN7JM 05:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
{{done}} File:LA 593 map.pngFredddie 19:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
The KML should show where the bridge used to be and how SR 822 connected to it. –Fredddie 04:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
@CycloneIsaac: See Fredddie's comment above. --AdmrBoltz 17:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
@Fredddie and Admrboltz: Better?—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 19:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
{{done}} by Mr. MattéFredddie 02:31, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

{{done}} File:Wendover Cut-off.svg Guerillero | My Talk 07:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC).

{{done}}, File:OH 11 map.svgMr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 02:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
{{done}} File:DE PA Route 261 map.svgMr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 23:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Class:  B-Class article
  • Action required: Correction to existing map
  • Comments: The current map doesn't show the portion of the route in Baltimore, only the portion in Baltimore County. I've just created the KML for this article, so the map should now be able to be updated easily. TCN7JM 04:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: Yes
  • Status: New request
On it --Guerillero | My Talk 04:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
@Guerillero: – Were you still going to create this map? TCN7JM 23:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
{{Done}} Maryland Route 41.svg --Guerillero | My Talk 04:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

North Carolina Highway 102

  • Class:  Good article
  • Action required: New Map
  • Comments:Just Promoted to GA Status Ncchild (talk) 21:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: NC
  • Status: {{not done}} per the limit of 5 requested maps per state. No prejudice against re-requesting once the other maps have been completed. –Fredddie 23:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Class:  B-Class article
  • Action required: Correction to existing map
  • Comments: The current map has the route extending way past US 1 on a road I can't even seem to find on the map. It should end at US 1. TCN7JM 15:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: Yessir
  • Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 03:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Class:  B-Class article
  • Action required: Correction to existing map
  • Comments: MD 707A – that is, the easternmost segment of the highway – should end at MD 611 instead of continuing farther east like it does on the current map. According to the article, the route used to continue past that intersection, but it no longer does. TCN7JM 00:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: Nice thing about making a bunch of KMLs is that you notice errors like this more easily. It's right here.
  • Status: {{done}} –Fredddie 03:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Class:  Start-Class article
  • Action required: New Map
  • Comments: Creation of map showing the counties where the coalfield exists. Specifically, McDowell County West Virginia, Mercer County West Virginia and Tazewell County Virginia. The current article has been greatly expanded, added images showing history of area.
  • KML:No
  • Status: New requestCoal town guy (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Class:  Start-Class article
  • Action required: New map
  • Comments: This highway has a gap in it. Please coincide it with dotted lines to show its planned extension. HeatIsCool (talk) 23:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: (none)
  • Status: {{not done}} Not all the sections have been planned yet, so we'd have to make a new map every time something new was planned. –Fredddie 23:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Class:  Good article
  • Action required: Correction to existing map File:NJ-168 map.svg
  • Status: New request
  • KML: No
  • Comments: In NJ-168_map.svg, a few of the labels seem to be incorrect. At the top right, NJ-35 looks like it should be 38. At the bottom left, US-30 looks like it should be 322. Slightly above the middle, Haddonville looks like it should be Haddonfield. Since file creator JohnnyAlbert10 is currently inactive on Wikipedia, is someone else able and willing to correct his SVG file? Many thanks. –Patrug (talk) 07:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Though I don't like the older map format where everything is "Stroke to Path," this correction is {{done}}. —Mr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 12:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
@Morriswa: Could you provide a KML? The base map data I have does not show the Dublin bypass over which SR 117 travels. –Fredddie 03:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm at work now, so I can't do that. If you use Google Street View, you will see that SR&nsbp;117 travels along the Dublin bypass (clearly marked). Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 03:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I think he means that his GIS data doesn't show the bypass, not that he doesn't know where it is. TCN7JM 03:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
TCN7JM is correct. Without a KML, I can select the road segments manually and go from there. In this case, there are no road segments to select. –Fredddie 04:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
@Morriswa: Please see above. Your map can not be created unless you provide a KML file. --AdmrBoltz 14:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
@Morriswa: Any progress on the KML? –Fredddie 21:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
No, sorry. My computer has been running very slow lately, and I don't think I should try to work on it. :-( Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
@Morriswa: @Fredddie: I created a KML file for this route, it's at: Template:Attached KML/Georgia State Route 117 Thewombatguru (talk) 08:54, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Class:  C-Class article
  • Action required: New map
  • KML: Yes checkY
  • Comments: Recently added Interstate in NC. Section only 4.09 miles long in Raleigh, with Future section continuing northeast to Rocky Mount (via US 64). Future section will take several years to upgrade to Interstate standards. No KML, but Google maps and NCDOT maps available. --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
@Washuotaku: I created a KML map, did I do it correctly, (I did not add the future part)? Template:Attached KML/Interstate 495 (North Carolina) Thewombatguru (talk) 23:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
@Thewombatguru: Is it possible to also add the Future part similar to I-26 (NC)? (It as both Current in red and Future in yellow.) If not, no worries because you nailed it for what exists of the current I-495 in NC. Thank you! --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
@Washuotaku: I tried, Template:Attached KML/Interstate 495 (North Carolina). Thewombatguru (talk) 09:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
@Thewombatguru: No worries, thank you for doing this. Hopefully a map will appear shortly now. :) --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:58, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
@Washuotaku: So the KML for the future part is ok as well? Thewombatguru (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
@Thewombatguru: Opps, I took it as you couldn't do it. I looked at the file now, that is correct; the red is exactly what currently exists and the yellow is Future. Thanks again! --WashuOtaku (talk) 15:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
@Ncchild: I created a KML for this route at Template:Attached KML/North Carolina Highway 133 Thewombatguru (talk) 10:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
@Thewombatguru: I reviewed it and found that the south end goes three blocks passed the southern terminus in Oak Island, located intersection of E Oak Island Drive/Country Club Drive. Other than that, it looks good. --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
@Washuotaku: I think it's fixed now. Thewombatguru (talk) 16:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
@Thewombatguru: Looks good, I'll go ahead and check-off the KML file for @Ncchild:, I'm sure he would approve too. Thanks again! --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
I just saw it so I am a little late, but definitely thanks. I really wanted this to be done since it was my first C class article so its special to me (I had never gotten anything above a start before).--Ncchild (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
No problem, it only took me about 5-10 minutes. Thewombatguru (talk) 09:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Would there be a way to distinguish the proposed segment to US 301 in Zephyrhills, Florida? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 05:28, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
@PointsofNoReturn: I created a KML for this route at Template:Attached KML/Florida State Road 56
  • Class:  C-Class article
  • Action required: Correction to existing map
  • Status: {{done}} File:Georgia 223 map.svgFredddie 00:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: No
  • Comments: The segment of the highway from its western terminus to its intersection with Georgia State Route 17, and its concurrency with SR 17, have been decommissioned, so a new map is needed. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 10:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Class:  Start-Class article
  • Action required: Correction to existing map File:I-49_(LA)_map.svg
  • Comments: Road from Kansas City to Pineville has been signed I-49 in Missouri, and Arkansas was approved to designate the current I-540 from Bella Vista as I-49 this week. Other parts of the road are planned, under construction, designated as Future I-49, etc., which I think would be useful information for a holistic view of the Interstate as it is and will be. 108.234.58.180 (talk) 21:24, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: No
  • Status: New request
{{done}} - Full-length I-49 map at File:I-49 map 2014.svg, Louisiana map updated at File:I-49 (LA) 2014.svgMr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 17:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
{{done}} File:MS 792 map.svgFredddie 17:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Class:  C-Class article
  • Action required: Updated map
  • Status: New request
  • KML: No
  • Comments: I-99 officially got signed in New York state last summer. We need to have a map with both segments, plus a dotted line as to where the two sections eventually connect. I would not worry about putting a similar dotted line to I-68 in Cumberland, Maryland at this time, since it seems to be on hold. Jgera5 (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
{{done}} File:I-99 map.svgFredddie 16:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
@Mitchazenia: Will the new at-grade Inner Loop still be called the Inner Loop? If so, I'm not sure we'll need to make a new map. –Fredddie 00:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Not sure, but I am guessing the intent is that it will just be city streets. Mitch32(I have seen great intolerance shown in support of tolerance) 01:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
{{done}} Regardless, I created a new map from the old one File:Inner Loop Rochester 2014 map.svgFredddie 01:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Class:  C-Class article
  • Action required: New map
  • Status: New request
  • KML: Yes
  • Comments: OH-612 is a former state route, as in one that doesn't exist anymore (the road itself still exists, but not the route number). The route existed from 1937 until 1951, so it would be preferred to make the maps correspond with those time periods. A Cuyahoga County road map from 1940 can be found here to help you; OH-612 is currently known as W. 130th Street, and the actual route itself is the same now as it was in the 1940s. OH-612 lied between OH-82 and OH-10. Pyrotlethe "y" is silent, BTW. 03:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Accepted as I have most of my Ohio road data from when I did those routes in 2013/2014, but I won't be able to completely vouch for whether or not all the roads shown actually existed during the map's time frame. —Mr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 23:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
{{done}} - File:OH 612 map (1951).svgMr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 01:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Class:  Start-Class article
  • Action required: New map
  • Comments: US 220 in NC should not make any changes for the next few years, recommend creating a new map for it now; there is a google map ref available, but no KML. --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:35, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: Yes checkY
  • Status: New request
@Washuotaku: I created a KML for this route which is located at Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 220 in North Carolina Thewombatguru (talk) 11:10, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
@Thewombatguru: Thank you for making the first draft on the KML file, but there are a couple mistakes in the routing. 1) US 220 exits off I-73/I-74 at Ellerbe (exit 25/google still has 8) and merges with I-73/I-74 between Candor and Emery (exit 41/google still has 24). 2) Southbound US 220, in Greensboro, is routing off Battleground Avenue onto Westover Terrace and then onto Wendover Avenue; the correct southbound routing stays on Battleground Avenue onto Wendover Avenue, northbound there is correct. Those two things, and the Southbound routing going into Virginia to u-turn back into NC, and it should then be correct. --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
@Washuotaku: I fixed the U-turn in Virginia, sorry, I thought I checked that at every KML. Also the problem with Westover Terrace is fixed, I'll upload it later today. Is there a route in this version of the Google Maps map that the US-220 nowadays uses between Ellerbe and Candor? I've not been able to fix that yet. Thewombatguru (talk) 15:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
@Washuotaku: I think I also fixed the other problem, could you check this? Thewombatguru (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
@Thewombatguru: You got it, thank you very much! --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
@TheWombatGuru: something isn't quite right. The line for US 220 doesn't quite line up with the data I'm using. I'm using NHPN data. –Fredddie 03:05, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

{{done}} File:US 220 in North Carolina map.svgMr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 04:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


  • Class:  Start-Class article
  • Action required: New map
  • Comments: I-73 has now one continious section in NC completed; new sections will not be added for a couple of years. No KML available, (Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? TCN7JM 04:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)) but a google map ref exists. --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: Yes
  • Status: New request

{{done}} File:Interstate 73 in North Carolina map (2015).svgMr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 04:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Class:  C-Class article
  • Action required: Correction to existing map File:I-74 (NC) map.svg
  • Comments: I-74 has extended bigger in the center section in 2013; no new section to be added for at least another year or two from now. --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • KML: Yes
  • Status: New request

{{done}} File:Interstate 74 in North Carolina map (2015).svgMr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 04:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)