User talk:Johnson487682: Difference between revisions
→re word count tool: GOCE newsletter using AWB |
→Re Oops!: new section |
||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/March 2011}} |
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/March 2011}} |
||
</br><small>Sent on behalf of the [[WP:GOCE|Guild of Copy Editors]] using [[Project:AWB|AWB]] on 04:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)</small> |
</br><small>Sent on behalf of the [[WP:GOCE|Guild of Copy Editors]] using [[Project:AWB|AWB]] on 04:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
== Re Oops! == |
|||
Heh. No worries. My edit summary may have been a bit bitey, but I'd gone halfway through the article copyediting (thinking 'gee, this doesn't need much done', so being ''super'' picky), before deciding someone may have beaten me to it. Then checked the edit history to see they (you) had, so was a little annoyed at wasting that time on it. Spose it serves me right for not checking the edit history first (which I usually do). :) --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 06:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:29, 15 March 2011
Yank Adams
Hey. Thanks for the typo fixes on Yank Adams. I've Been working hard to get it up to spec before placement on the main page in the did you know section. As I see your a new here, I am placing a welcome template below. Cheers!--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome; however, I don't consider myself "new here", because my contributions go back to 2007. Perhaps you're politely implying that I need to study up on a few of the topics in the template below? I'll take a look at them. Johnson487682 (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, didn't mean anything by it. I took a quick glance at your contributions and saw the number and didn't even notice the dates.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
|
katrina and ivan spills
those spills all had different causes and occurred in different places. there's also plenty of data available to support shier own line item and separate articles as well. cheers! --emerson7 16:04, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Fixed by breaking each katrina and ivan spill onto its own line. Johnson487682 (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
List of oil spills: error messages
You rock! ...cheers! --emerson7 17:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Katrina links
Thanks for the link fixes; that said, Katrina has over 5000 articles that link to it, so it is essentially impossible to check which section links were going to the oil spill section. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 21:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Jebel al-Zayt oil spill
you might fing this article of interest here. --emerson7 19:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, that article seems remarkable at first, but it also says "the spill, which began last week", so I think it's just an old article. Today's date is displayed at the top of the webpage, but I don't think that's the date of the article. -- Johnson487682 (talk) 18:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- yes. i too saw that, but wasn't sure if perhaps there were any updates there or elsewere. data on the spill are really scant internet-wide...at least in english. cheers!
offshore oil platform?
what's an example of an offshore oil platform that stands on the ground in shallow water? --emerson7 23:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- The Hibernia is attached to the ground under the North Atlantic off Newfoundland in only about 100 m of water. Many such rigs are also found in the North Sea, such as Gullfaks C, which stands in 217 m of water. This type of fixed platform is only feasible in less than about 500 m of water. Deeper water requires floating or semi-submersible platforms, which do not stand on the ground. Johnson487682 (talk) 19:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Megumi kanda.png
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/32px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Megumi kanda.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:36, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for notifying me of this omission. I have contacted both the publisher of the source image and the MSO requesting permission to use this, or a similar, image. Johnson487682 (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was not able to receive permission, so I have uploaded my own image instead. Johnson487682 (talk) 05:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks re Tom Sherlock
Noticed you helping out here with adding references to one of the many backlogged unsourced BLPs, and thought I'd say "thanks". One tip: there's a pretty cool tool that makes writing formatted refs easier at Wikipedia:RefToolbar 2.0, saves me and the rest of the folks over at Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue quite a bit of time. Cheers, and happy editing! --j⚛e deckertalk 16:41, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I think you've misunderstood me, your use of "cite" looked great as far as I read. I just found that using refTools made it faster to do with fewer errors myself (I've added sources to about 1600 articles in the last year, so I've had more than enough opportunities to make errors!), I didn't see any problems in your own. Sorry for the confusion! --j⚛e deckertalk 18:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Cool--thanks! Johnson487682 (talk) 19:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
re word count tool
Oops, sorry! My bad, I wasn't paying attention I guess. Thank you for catching my egregious error. I reverted it immediately I got your message (and you could have done so yourself of course).
Nope the tool mentioned didn't work for me and I doubt that it can be made to - sometimes these things work for me and sometimes they don't, don't know if it's my machine or what. But I can use a word processor tool as you suggested, thanks for the link. Herostratus (talk) 14:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
GOCE / Mid-drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Here is your mid-drive newsletter.
![]() So far, 79 people have signed up for this drive. Of these, 64 have participated. Interest is high due to a link to our event from the Watchlist page, and many new and first-time copy editors have joined us for the drive. If you signed up for the drive but haven't participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you haven't signed up for the drive yet, you can sign up now. Many thanks to those editors who have been helping out at the Requests page. We have assisted in the promotion of seven articles to Good article status so far this month.
We have already achieved our target of reducing the overall backlog by 10%; however, we have more work to do with the 2009 backlog. We have almost eliminated May 2009 and we only have some 700 articles left from 2009. It is excellent progress, so let's concentrate our fire power on the remaining months from 2009. Thank you for participating in the March 2011 drive. We anticipate it will be another big success!
The UtahraptorTalk to me has decided to step down from his position as project coordinator due to real-life issues. Your drive coordinators – S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk) and Tea with toast (Talk) |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 04:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Re Oops!
Heh. No worries. My edit summary may have been a bit bitey, but I'd gone halfway through the article copyediting (thinking 'gee, this doesn't need much done', so being super picky), before deciding someone may have beaten me to it. Then checked the edit history to see they (you) had, so was a little annoyed at wasting that time on it. Spose it serves me right for not checking the edit history first (which I usually do). :) --jjron (talk) 06:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)