Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 11:10, 1 March 2022

< February 28

March 2 >

March 1

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 1, 2022.

Wikipedia talk:SOAP

Wikipedia talk:SOAP → Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Wikipedia:SOAP and its talk page, each redirect to very different places. Currently:

WP:SOAP => Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion

WT:SOAP => Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas

-- DB1729 (talk) 11:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Western leftism

Western leftism → Baizuo (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I'm not sure the target page can be considered the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC or that it's a neutral destination. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 07:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the target notes this redirect in a hatnote and suggests readers might be interesting in the general left-wing politics article. Google results show the current target to be the single most common thing referred to, but nowhere near primary topic over various different leftist groups/people/ideologies/parties in the cultural West with exact meaning depending heavily on context. I need to think more about this. Thryduulf (talk) 09:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:BC

Wikipedia:BC → Wikipedia:WikiProject British Columbia (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This page should be made a disambiguation page, for the reason that I outline for other redirects (edited) of this ilk: undue focus (to quote another RfD commentor) on a niche WikiProject, when there are a few other pages (like WP:Bureaucrats) that can also fit this acronym. Even though the Brit. Col. WikiProject is not as dormant as others, it is still not fairly accommodating all navigators of this redirect. NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For another example of provincial WikiProject being dabified this way, see WP:MB and its RfD. NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all my comments at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 13#MS and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#EE. Unless you can show some evidence of this redirect being actually (not theoretically) problematic (for example by a significant proportion of links being intended for a different target than the current one) then there is only harm and no benefit from change. Thryduulf (talk) 10:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate, but not per the nominator, who has failed to advance any convincing rationale for why this should be disambiguated. Potential ambiguity is not on it's own a sufficient reason to break incoming links, nor are vague assertions that the target is niche. The whole point of shortcut redirects is to provide a quick way of navigating to pages, disambiguation essentially destroys a large part of the utility of them. This should be disambiguated because it originally targeted WP:Bootcamp, and was widely used in welcome templates for new users before being retargeted to point at the wikiproject, in fact WT:BC still points to the old place. Doing a spot check of incoming links to this redirect suggests to me that a significant proportion of them (certainly several thousand) are supposed to be targeting the help page. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 11:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate per 192.76.8.70. There appear to be a very large number of incoming links intending the Bootcamp, and as far as I can see only about two dozen uses for the British Columbia project. The dab page could then also have entries for MOS:BC (probably a more plausible target than any other), Wikipedia:Basic copyediting, and possibly others. – Uanfala (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tangan

Tangan → Hand (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete. This word is not mentioned at the target, wikt:tangan tells me it does mean "hand" in many languages, including Malay and Indonesian, but it also a romansiation of two different Japanese words (meaning "entreaty, petition, to implore, to beg" and "Simple eye" or "one-eyed creature") and a verb form of the Spanish word "tangar" meaning "to trick" or "to swindle". Gooogle Maps tells me it's also the name of a settlement in Tajikistan, but I can't verify that in reliable sources. Wikipedia search results find primarily partial title matches for several Iranian vilages, and phrases in Indonesian or Malay. Thryduulf (talk) 17:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Tangon River as {{R from other spelling}}, and add a mention. See e.g. s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Malda, File:River Tangan at Aiho.jpg, and Malda govt website. Narky Blert (alt) (talk) 06:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RLOTE. Originally at different target, it was retargeted by an IP, who is probably Indonesian, to hand. Neocorelight (Talk) 13:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Geolocation shows the IP is indeed within the Indonesia area. 98.179.127.59 (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too many meanings, too confusing for readers. 98.179.127.59 (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Ambiguous (various foreign words per nom, Tangon River per Narky Blert, and Palangan, Kurdistan per original target), but I do not believe a dab page is warranted, mainly per WP:DABDIC and that I struggle to find any English coverage that refers to either of Tangon River and Palangan, Kurdistan as simply "Tangan" (no "River", no accents). eviolite (talk) 20:41, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate. We've got a number of sources that use "Tangan" (with or without "river") as the name of the river, and there's also a village whose article gives "Tangan" as synonym. Both are valid dab entries, and we're not including the Malay word for 'hand', so WP:DABDIC shouldn't concern us. The only question that I see is if there is a primary topic, and here the river certainly has a very strong claim. – Uanfala (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lynching of Wollo University professors

Lynching of Wollo University professors → Timeline of the Tigray War (July 2021–present) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; misleading redirect. 98.179.127.59 (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Restore to pre-redirect version. This along with some 100 articles were part of an AfD which closed to encourage smaller batches of nominations, but this was not re-nominated. The talk page discussions had support for redirect with the suggestion from Platonk that if, after doing the redirect method, there is objection then one could always undo the redirect and start a proposal.. Jay (talk) 20:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Langenkamp (Wes Craven's New Nightmare character)

Heather Langenkamp (Wes Craven's New Nightmare character) → Nancy Thompson (A Nightmare on Elm Street) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No articles link to redirect. Created by user who has a nine-page talk page archive of notices for deletion of redirects, categories and orphaned images, the majority of which have been removed. AldezD (talk) 19:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget, same as § Heather Langenkamp (Wes Craven's New Nightmare) Paradoctor (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Paradoctor. This is a character in that movie, it is discussed at the target. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 13:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I assume you mean Retarget? Because that's what I propose, and what you said below. ;) Paradoctor (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's no anchor for the paragraph Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994) at Nancy Thompson (A Nightmare on Elm Street); this current target article discusses the topic. The rationale for keeping the redirect is the same, the target is different. It should keep pointing to the Nancy article. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What you are saying here makes no sense. Both redirects should go to the same target, yet on one you !vote retarget, and on the other you vote keep. Would you please clarify what you are voting for? Paradoctor (talk) 06:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This redirect contains "character", and the target is a fictional character article discussing the fictional Heather. The other redirect is missing "character" and could equally refer to the actress herself instead of her fictionalized version, thus should target the movie, since both are equially represented there under the topic of "Wes Craven's New Nightmare" instead of "Wes Craven's New Nightmare character". The "character" redirect thus justifiably redirects to a character article, where a variant of that character occurs with the name "Heather" in a paragraph of coverage. The "character"-less redirect should point to the film article, as it could be referring to the real-ife actress as well as the fictionalized actress character, and thus points to the film article where both occur in the context of that movie. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If "Heather Langenkamp (Wes Craven's New Nightmare)" could also refer to the actress, it would be ambiguous between the real actress and the fictional actress. If the real actress is the primary meaning, the redirect should point to Heather Langenkamp. If the fictional actress is the primary, it should point to the same target as the other redirect, as both are about the the fictional actress.

Either way, it should not point to the Nancy article. Subtopic redirects go to their supertopic, not other articles excerpting the supertopic. Paradoctor (talk) 15:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PopCap Games Framework

PopCap Games Framework → PopCap Games#PopCap Games Framework (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Section this is pointed to was removed by IceWelder for a lack of RS, wanted consensus for what to do with this. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 23:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 03:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and re-add to the article somehow. This is one reliable source about it. Neocorelight (Talk) 23:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sope Willams- Elegbe

Sope Willams- Elegbe → Sope Willams Elegbe (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Name of redirect is not viable with the space but page contains some historic content and actually pre-dates existing article page. The redirect Sope Willams-Elegbe already exists with content. Djm-leighpark (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ask The Big Banana

Ask The Big Banana → Space Ghost Coast to Coast (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I'm not sure that this is an acceptable alternate title, episode title, or quote from the show that meets the notability guidelines. Google search results are inconclusive. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 03:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birdman Coast to Coast

Birdman Coast to Coast → Space Ghost Coast to Coast (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I'm not sure that this is an acceptable alternate title, episode title, or quote from the show that meets the notability guidelines. Google search results are inconclusive. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 03:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia the Martyr (Q15916381)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 09:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia the Martyr (Q15916381) → Sophia of Rome (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Per numerous past discussions, we don't keep redirects with Q numbers. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think this is a mistake on my part. The redirection should only be from Sophia the Martyr to Sophia of Rome.--Parsedan (talk) 07:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gamma-aminobutylic acid

Gamma-aminobutylic acid → Gamma-Aminobutyric acid (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

a potentially misleading misspelling that might incorrectly imply the compound contains a butyl group, otherwise an unlikely misspelling in any case. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

∾

∾ → wikt:∾ (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Another Wiktionary redirect from Neel.arunabh that targets an empty Wiktionary page. The current target here is completely inadequate containing only the unicode character name and a message that someone needs to add a definition. Unless a proper definition is added this should be retargeted to something local or deleted 192.76.8.77 (talk) 01:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Neel.arunabh has added the useless definition (mathematics) inverted lazy s, which is identical to the description. That helps no one and does not change my position that the redirect should be deleted unless a local target is identified. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Supermassive star

Supermassive star → List of most massive stars (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Supermassive stars are a specific type of star theorised in recent years to have existed in the early universe (e.g. [1] ) which should have a page of their own; the wiki-link should not simply redirect to the list of *current* most massive stars observed Fig (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to supermassive black hole, and tag as {{r with possibilities}}. Supermassive stars have been discussed for decades as the source for quasars and supermassive black holes, so they are clearly a subtopic. Paradoctor (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- That'd be a bad idea. They are mostly unrelated. It should just go to those stars themselves, the Population III stars -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to stellar population#Population III star which is what this is referring to (the stars of the early universe) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. and WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It was WP:BLAR'd, then you'd need to revert to the time it was an article, and proceed from there -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mini-Pufts

Mini-Pufts → Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No articles link to redirect. Created by user who has a nine-page talk page archive of notices for deletion of redirects, categories and orphaned images, the majority of which have been removed. AldezD (talk) 19:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, mentioned and described at target. Alternative would be to retarget to Ghostbusters: Afterlife. A lack of links is not a sufficient reason to delete a redirect, as redirects are also search terms. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no valid reason for deletion provided. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mass formation

Mass formation → Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Used in a wide variety of contexts in academic literature, from fluid dynamics to microbiology to applied medicine. Not well-described anywhere on Wikipedia, although "Mass formation psychosis" is discussed in some detail at Robert_W._Malone#COVID-19. Given the circumstances, I think that deletion to allow for search results is appropriate. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a number of substantive examples of "mass formation" being used in other fields as a standalone phrase (i.e., not as "XXX mass formation", which is usually to be parsed as "[XXX mass] formation" not as "XXX [mass formation]" and therefore irrelevant)? Google hits at the moment reveal overwhelming support for this being used in the context of "mass formation psychosis" (correctly parsed as "[mass formation] psychosis"), which is a term apparently invented by Mattias Desmet (not Robert Malone) based on the real term "mass formation" used by Freud in this book. There's no question that--regardless of its veracity--"mass formation" is a significant concept in public discourse at the moment and that this book is its origin... Bueller 007 (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The most common result after discarding "[XXX mass] formation"-form results is for mass formation in medical contexts: [2], [3], [4]. These are just a small sample, I scrolled through 6 pages of GScholar results for "mass formation" -water (as "water mass formation" is the most common result for the [XXX mass] form) and found no results about psychology, group or otherwise. Can you provide any scholarly examples where "mass formation" is invoked without the phrase "psychosis" to refer to the social psychology usage? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the current association with COVID misinformation, any change to an article (or disambig) should probably be workshopped in draft space first. Bakkster Man (talk) 19:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 19:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the expression can refer to numerous phenomenons as pointed out in the nom. Furthermore, it can also refer to the biological phenomenon of how a mass of fat is formed, or to the geological phenomenon of how a mass of rock or sand is formed. Veverve (talk) 11:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Thesmp (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DABify. If there are a bunch of expressions that this term refers to, then making a useful disambiguation page seems better than just deleting it. — Mhawk10 (talk) 23:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment @Mhawk10: What would a disambiguation look like? Do you have examples of articles that "mass formation" may refer to? -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

๐

๐ → 0 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๑ → 1 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๒ → 2 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๓ → 3 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๔ → 4 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๕ → 5 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๖ → 6 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๗ → 7 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๘ → 8 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

๙ → 9 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I think that these redirects would serve our readers better targeting the article on Thai numerals, rather than pointing to the articles on the value that each of these characters represents. The articles on the numbers only contain a passing mention of these characters in the infobox, as opposed to the article on Thai numerals which contains a wealth of information on how they are pronounced, how they are used, their etymology etc etc etc. We have several hundered of these redirects for various numeral systems and a lot of these redirects are ancient, so I think it would be good to have a discussion about which target is preferable. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget as suggested. I think this is much more likely to be helpful to readers than the redirects to the individual numbers. After all, if somebody is interested in one Thai digit then it is very likely that they will also be interested in the others and in how they are used. If we think that some readers might actually want the individual number articles then we can link them from Thai numerals so that they are still within easy reach. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget all Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 01:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget all to Thai numerals * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget all before someone redirects A to 10, B to 11 (number), C to 12 (number), etc. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About 15 years ago: A (digit), B (digit), C (digit), D (digit), E (digit), F (digit). ;) Paradoctor (talk) 10:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget all per nom and DanielRigal. Thryduulf (talk) 09:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 -->
 <!-- Add new entries directly below this line. -->
+====Wikipedia talk:SOAP====
+*<span id="Wikipedia talk:SOAP">{{no redirect|1 = Wikipedia talk:SOAP }}</span> → [[:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas]] <span>&nbsp;<span class="plainlinks lx">([[Wikipedia talk:SOAP|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia talk:SOAP|links]] <b>·</b> [[Special:PageHistory/Wikipedia talk:SOAP|history]] <b>·</b> [[:toolforge:pageviews/?start=2022-01-30&end=2022-02-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Wikipedia_talk:SOAP|stats]])</span></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<small class="plainlinks"><nowiki>[</nowiki>&nbsp;Closure:&nbsp;''{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Wikipedia talk:SOAP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia talk:SOAP]] closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Wikipedia talk:SOAP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia talk:SOAP]] closed as retarget}}}} retarget]<span class="sysop-show">/[{{fullurl:Wikipedia talk:SOAP|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia talk:SOAP]] closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]</span>}}''&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp;
+[[Wikipedia:SOAP]] and its talk page, each redirect to very different places. Currently:
+[[WP:SOAP]] => [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion]]
+[[WT:SOAP]] => [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas]]
+-- [[User:DB1729|DB1729]] ([[User talk:DB1729|talk]]) 11:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 ====Western leftism====
 *<span id="Western leftism">{{no redirect|1 = Western leftism }}</span> → [[:Baizuo]] <span>&nbsp;<span class="plainlinks lx">([[Talk:Western leftism|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Western leftism|links]] <b>·</b> [[Special:PageHistory/Western leftism|history]] <b>·</b> [[:toolforge:pageviews/?start=2022-01-30&end=2022-02-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Western_leftism|stats]])</span></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<small class="plainlinks"><nowiki>[</nowiki>&nbsp;Closure:&nbsp;''{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Western leftism|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Western leftism]] closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Western leftism|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Western leftism]] closed as retarget}}}} retarget]<span class="sysop-show">/[{{fullurl:Western leftism|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Western leftism]] closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]</span>}}''&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp;