Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Road junction lists: Difference between revisions
Imzadi1979 (talk | contribs) m →Interstate 275: updating table |
m →Coordinates: rm sig |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
*Crossings with other highways where no interchange between the highways exists |
*Crossings with other highways where no interchange between the highways exists |
||
*Proposed or future interchanges that have not reached the construction phase. Do not add future exit numbers without a [[Wikipedia:reliable source|reliable source]] such as signing plans. |
*Proposed or future interchanges that have not reached the construction phase. Do not add future exit numbers without a [[Wikipedia:reliable source|reliable source]] such as signing plans. |
||
==== Coordinates ==== |
|||
If including geographical coordinates, use {{TL|Coord}} for each set; and one instance of {{TL|GeoGroupTemplate}} per page. |
|||
==Highway link appearance== |
==Highway link appearance== |
Revision as of 20:23, 6 August 2011
![]() | This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page. |
Manual of Style (MoS) |
---|
This style guide provides the foundation for creating, editing and maintaining road junction lists across Wikipedia articles. Most road articles should use a table to indicate junctions. There are cases, such as a major transcontinental highway with parent and section-detail articles, where only a partial junction list, in a list form, is appropriate.
Using this style guide
As road design, jurisdiction and construction techniques vary significantly around the world, so do junctions and signing standards. While this document has been developed to provide a basis for a uniform presentation of road junction information, not all information is applicable to all roads in all regions. Thus, certain provisions of this guideline are noted as being for optional use. When creating or editing junction lists for a particular country or state, check with an appropriate road-related WikiProject for that region. The various projects may have adopted practices or preferences regarding some of the optional provisions presented below.
In some cases, there are different methods of doing the same thing. This guideline makes no preference of one system over another. Rather than needlessly editing back and forth, please follow the format of the first complete and compliant junction list on the article.
Summary lists
These should be formatted as a bulleted list consisting of the names of intersecting highways and locations.
Tables
Standard columns
Generally, the following columns should appear from left to right in the following order:
- Geographic columns should be used to orient the location of a junction along the path of the roadway. These will vary based on the country that the highway is in, and may not be applicable in all countries. These should be formatted so one cell expands across the rows for all junctions within a geographic entity. If the roadway only passes through one geographic location, the column(s) should be omitted and a note placed above the top of the column. These columns may be omitted entirely if there is not consensus on what subdivisions to use. The locations should be wikilinked. Examples of these column types are:
- State subdivision: The subdivision of the country, state or province within which the junction lies. Title the column with an appropriate term—region, county, district, prefecture, parish (as in Louisiana), borough (as in Alaska), or equivalent.
- Location: The municipality or equivalent within which the junction lies, whether it be a town, city, or village. If the location is indeterminable, or if the junction lies in unincorporated territory, this should be left blank. If the route passes through an independent city or a consolidated city-county, do not repeat the location in both columns, instead have an entry which spans both columns.
- Mile or km: The measured location of the junction. If no source is available, and the road uses a distance-based exit numbering system, then this column may be left out in favor of the exit number column. For lists in some geographic areas, other terminology may be used in accordance with alternate distance-measuring systems. The default practice is to use one column with one measurement system, but some situations may require both columns.
- Exit or Junction: This column is for use on grade-separated roadways that have numbered interchanges. The column lists the number of the exit/junction. If old and new numbers exist, these should be presented as two columns, "Old" and "New".
- Interchange name: This column should follow the exit/junction column for highway systems which have named interchanges. Use only if the interchange names are in common usage in the region and are not purely ceremonial names.
- Destinations: Locations and roads as presented on guide signs for the junction. Other locations should not be listed unless that location is extremely notable and well known; an entry in the notes column such as "Serves Missouri State University" can be used. Routes not indicated on the guide signs may be included in parentheses. This column may be split by carriageway or direction based on local signing practices.
- Notes: Any additional notes about the interchange or terminus, such as the design of an interchange, special circumstances such as missing ramps, concurrency termini, opening date, or additional locations that do not merit inclusion in "Destinations". If the Destinations column has been split into two columns by carriageway or direction, omit this column.
To comply with MOS:ACCESS, and promote accessibility on the part of our readers who use assistive technology like screen readers, tables or the templates used to create tables should use: !scope=col|<column name>
as the code to create column headers.
Colors
The use of colored backgrounds in the table is optional. If a list includes backgrounds, a key below the table must be included. Color should not be the only method to impart the information. For the benefit of colorblind readers or persons using screen readers, the Notes or Destination column(s) must include the information. The following table lists the standardized colors with standardized meanings. Additional colors may be used to supplement the standard colors below. These colors must be compliant with this guideline and WP:COLOR, and they must be included in the key below the table.
Color | Use | Notes |
---|---|---|
#d3d3d3 | Closed | Previously complete and open, but now closed (temp. or perm.) |
#ffdead | Unopened | Interchange being constructed, not yet open to traffic |
#ffdddd | Incomplete access | Some ramps/movements missing |
#ddffdd | Concurrency terminus | |
UK specific colors | ||
#0079c1 | Motorways | Uses white text in the table; used for table headers and classification transitions |
#00703c | Primary road | Uses yellow text (color #ffd200) in the table; used for table headers and classification transitions |
white | Secondary road | Used for table headers and classification transitions |
A standardized color key template has been implemented with {{legendRJL}}. A second footer, without a color key, can be generated with {{jctbtm}}. Both templates close the wikitable syntax and generate a conversion key. This conversion key is required on all tables unless both miles and kilometers are listed on the table. Samples of this key are used in the examples section below.
- Example 1, no colors:
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
- Example 2, colors:
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
- Example 3, UK colors. Since the UK is currently using two distance columns, the conversion key is unnecessary.
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
What to include
The following items should be included or excluded in tables on grade-separated highways.
- Include
- All grade-separated interchanges, without exception
- Concurrencies
- Toll barriers, major water bodies, bridges and tunnels, if possible, wikilink to the article on the bridge or tunnel concerned. These should be represented with a multi-column row. Ideally this should span the Exit/Junction, Destinations and Notes columns, allowing the distance where the barrier is located to appear to the left.
- Service areas; if multiple exist, limit those displayed to those of historical or other significance or notability. These should span the Exit/Junction, Destinations and Notes columns as above.
- Exclude
- Crossings with other highways where no interchange between the highways exists
- Proposed or future interchanges that have not reached the construction phase. Do not add future exit numbers without a reliable source such as signing plans.
Coordinates
If including geographical coordinates, use {{Coord}} for each set; and one instance of {{GeoGroupTemplate}} per page.
Highway link appearance
When linking to highways, a commonly used abbreviation should be used for the displayed text for the link. For instance: I-59, A1 rather than Interstate 59 or A1 road (Great Britain) respectively.
Text appearance
Text in the tables must comply with other provisions of the MoS, specifically regarding boldface, italics and ALLCAPS. Directional junctions should be formatted in the following pattern: "(route marker) (link to road article) (direction)". Directions must be entirely lowercase per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Directions and regions: "Directions such as north are not proper nouns and do not take capitals."
- Example:
M-28 east
Route markers
If route marker graphics are used, generally, they should have a height of 20–25px. They should always appear at the beginning of the line, per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (icons)#Do not use icons in general article prose: "Icons should not be used in the article body...This breaks up the continuity of the text, distracting the reader." Use of marker images should be limited to the Destinations column(s) only.
Special-case scenarios
- Some exits may have the same number for different interchanges. Some exits may have different numbers for the same interchange. In each case though, the list should be broken up by exit number, not by interchange, to maintain a consistent appearance.
- Junctions with signage that lists both the road name(s) and the route number should have both included in the exit list. If multiple names are given, every name should be listed. See the example for how to format these entries.
Concurrencies
There are two methods for displaying concurrencies. A simple note may be placed in the notes column for the interchanges where the concurrency begins and ends, or a multi-column row can be used to mark the termini of the concurrency. Ideally, this multi-column row should span the Destinations and Notes columns, allowing the milepost and exit number to appear to the left.
In some cases, a concurrency between two freeways can cause the exits along one freeway to "adopt" the exit numbering system of the other for the length of the concurrency, then revert back to the original numbering system after the concurrency. See Interstate 77 in Virginia for an example in practice. To deal with this issue, any and all exit numbers for that interchange should be displayed.
Interchanges with multiple exits
If there are two exits in an interchange, one for each direction of the crossing road, they should generally be combined into one row, unless this would complicate matters. If the two exits have different numbers, that should be noted in the notes column, for example "signed as exits 1A (north) and 1B (south) eastbound", in a case where only the eastbound freeway has the split.
If two interchanges with different roads have the same number with different lettered suffixes, they generally should not be combined.
Examples
Below are eight examples of junction lists designed according to the above standards. Depicted are a section of the Interstate 75 summary article, a portion of Interstate 275 (Michigan), the lists for Ontario Highway 402, M5 motorway, and Oklahoma State Highway 88, and portions of A20 motorway (Netherlands) and the Tomei Expressway, respectively.
Interstate 75
- Interstate 595 in Davie, Florida
- Interstate 275 near Parrish, Florida
- Florida State Road 60 near Brandon, Florida
- Interstate 4 near Tampa, Florida
- Interstate 275 near Lutz, Florida
- Interstate 10 in Lake City, Florida
Interstate 275
Template:MIexittop Template:MIexit Template:MIexit Template:MIexit Template:MIexit |- |colspan=6 align=center|Rows omitted |- Template:MIexit Template:MIexit Template:MIexit Template:MIexit Template:MIexit Template:MIexit
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi
|- |}
Highway 402
Division | Location | km[1] | Exit | Destinations | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
St. Clair River | 0.00 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Blue Water Bridge | ||
Lambton | Point Edward | 0.7 | 1 | Front Street | Formerly Highway 40B |
Sarnia | 1.1 | 2 | Christina Street North | No eastbound exit | |
3.0 | 3 | ![]() |
|||
5.4 | 6 | ![]() |
|||
8.2 | 9 | Airport Road | |||
Plympton-Wyoming | 14.7 | 15 | ![]() |
||
24.0 | 25 | ![]() ![]() |
Formerly Highway 21 south | ||
Warwick | 33.3 | 34 | ![]() ![]() |
Highway 21 was concurrent with Highway 402 west to Oil Heritage Road, prior to municipal downloading in 1997 | |
43.5 | 44 | ![]() |
Formerly Highway 79 | ||
Middlesex | Adelaide-Metcalfe | 54.6 | 56 | ![]() |
|
63.8 | 65 | ![]() |
Formerly Highway 81 | ||
Strathroy-Caradoc | 68.1 | 69 | ![]() |
||
80.8 | 82 | ![]() |
|||
84.3 | 86 | ![]() |
Formerly Highway 2 | ||
London | 96.6 | 98 | ![]() |
||
98.8 | 100 | Wonderland Road | Ramps added to existing overpass, interchange opened in 1998 | ||
102.5 | 103 | ![]() |
Eastbound exit and westbound entrance | ||
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
M5 motorway
M5 Motorway | |||||
mile | km | Northbound exits (B Carriageway) | Junction | Southbound exits (A Carriageway) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0 | 0.0 | The North West, Wolverhampton, Birmingham (north & east), Walsall M6 | M6, J8 [coord 1] |
Start of motorway | |
2.7 | 4.4 | West Bromwich, Birmingham (north west) A41 | J1 | West Bromwich, Birmingham (north west) A41 | |
5.4 | 8.7 | Dudley, Wolverhampton, Birmingham (west) A4123 |
J2 | Dudley, Wolverhampton, Birmingham (west) A4123 | |
8.2 | 13.3 | Birmingham (south west & central) A456 | J3 | Kidderminster A456 | |
Frankley Services | Services [coord 2] | Frankley Services | |||
14.8 | 23.8 | Birmingham (south) A38 Stourbridge A491 |
J4 | Bromsgrove A38 Stourbridge A491 | |
16.3 | 26.3 | NEC, Birmingham Airport, | J4a [coord 3] |
Birmingham (south & east), Redditch M42, London (M40) | |
21.6 | 34.9 | Droitwich Spa, Bromsgrove A38 | J5 | Droitwich Spa A38 | |
Worcester (north), Kidderminster A449 | J6 | Worcester (north) A449 Evesham A4538 | |||
Worcester (south) A44 | J7 | Worcester (south) A44 | |||
Strensham services | Services | Strensham services | |||
39.8 | 64.2 | South Wales, Ross-on-Wye M50 | J8 | South Wales, Ross M50 | |
44.0 | 70.9 | Tewkesbury A438 Evesham A46 | J9 | Tewkesbury A438 Evesham A46 | |
48.0 | 77.4 | No access | J10 | Cheltenham A4019 | |
51.2 | 82.6 | Cheltenham, Gloucester (north), Gloucestershire Airport A40 |
J11 | Cheltenham, Gloucester (north), Gloucestershire Airport A40 | |
53.6 | 86.4 | Gloucester, Cirencester (east) A417 | J11a | London, Cirencester A417 | |
Gloucestershire Gateway Services[2] | Services | Gloucestershire Gateway Services[3] | |||
60.3 | 97.3 | Gloucester (south) (A38) | J12 | Gloucester (south) (A38) | |
Rows omitted | |||||
157.6 | 254.2 | Exeter A379 Sidmouth, Exmouth (A3052) A376 Exeter services |
J30 Services |
Exeter A379 Sidmouth, Exmouth A376 Exeter services | |
Start of motorway | J31 | Bodmin, Okehampton A30 | |||
Bodmin, Okehampton A30 Non-motorway traffic |
Road becomes A38 from/to Plymouth and Torquay | ||||
Data[4][5][6] from driver location signs are used to provide distance and carriageway identifier information | |||||
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
- Coordinate list
- ^ 52°32′53″N 1°57′54″W / 52.548°N 1.965°W Northern end of M5 (interchange with M6)
- ^ 52°25′44″N 2°01′05″W / 52.429°N 2.018°W Frankley Services (between J3 and J4)
- ^ 52°21′15″N 2°04′11″W / 52.3542°N 2.0698°W J4a - Start of M42
SH-88
The entire route is in Rogers County.
Location | mi[7] | km | Destinations | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Inola | 0.0 | 0.0 | Commercial St.[8] | Southern terminus |
| 0.9 | 1.4 | ![]() | Partial cloverleaf interchange[8] |
Claremore | 13.0 | 20.9 | ![]() | Southern end of SH-66 concurrency |
13.1 | 21.1 | ![]() | Southern end of SH-20 concurrency | |
13.2 | 21.2 | ![]() | Northern end of SH-66 concurrency | |
14.0 | 22.5 | ![]() | Northern end of SH-20 concurrency | |
Oologah | 26.0 | 41.8 | ![]() | Northern terminus |
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
A20 motorway (Netherlands)
The entire route is in South Holland.
Municipality | km | Exit | Name | Roads | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Westland | 10 | Naaldwijk | N223 | Continues as road N213 to Westland. | |
12 | 6 | Maasdijk | N220 | ||
Maassluis | 17 | 7 | Maassluis | ||
Vlaardingen | 21 | 8 | Vlaardingen-West | ||
22 | 9 | Vlaardingen | |||
Schiedam | 23 | Interchange Kethelplein | A4 | ||
24 | 10 | Schiedam-Noord | Noord means north | ||
26 | 11 | Schiedam | |||
Rotterdam | 27 | 12 | Spaanse Polder | ||
29 | 13 | Overschie / Interch. Kleinpolderplein | A13 | ||
31 | 14 | Centrum | Centrum means center | ||
32 | 15 | Crooswijk | Eastbound exit and westbound entrance | ||
35 | Interchange Terbregseplein | A16 | |||
38 | 16 | Prins Alexander | |||
Nieuwerkerk a/d IJssel | 43 | 17 | Nieuwerkerk aan den IJssel | N219 | |
Moordrecht | 46 | 18 | Moordrecht | ||
Gouda | 49 | Interchange Gouwe | A12 | ||
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
Tomei Expressway
Prefecture | Municipality | km | Exit | Int. name | Destinations | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continues as Shuto Expressway Route 3 | ||||||
Tokyo | Setagaya | 0.0 | 1 | Tokyo | Kanpachi-dori (Prefectural Route 311) - Tokyo, Setagaya | |
Kanagawa | Kawasaki | 7.6 | 3 | Tomei Kawasaki | Kawasaki, Noborito, Tama | |
Yokohama | 13.3 | 3-1 | Yokohama Aoba | ![]() |
||
19.7 | 4 | Yokohama-Machida | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Atsugi | 35.0 | 5 | Atsugi | ![]() ![]() |
||
Hadano | 50.1 | 5-1 | Hadano-Nakai | Hadanoninomiya Route (Prefectural Route 71) - Hadano, Nakai | ||
Oi-machi | 57.9 | 6 | Oi-Matsuda | ![]() ![]() |
||
Shizuoka | Gotemba | 83.7 | 7 | Gotemba | ![]() |
|
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
km
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Reference here
- ^ Reference here
- ^ "Traffic England Live Traffic Condition Map". Locations extracted from Traffic Camera Popup (J1 to J10). Highways Agency. Retrieved 2009-11-04.
- ^ J11-J18: Driver Location Signs, M5 J18-11, M4 J22-15 (map) Highway Authority 2009
- ^ J19-J30: Driver Location Signs, M5 J19-30 (map) - Highway Authority, 2009
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
okhighways
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b Google (2007-07-06). "Manual of Style" (Map). Google Maps. Google. Retrieved 2007-07-06.