User talk:99801155KC9TV

This person believed the SOPA/PIPA blackout was absurd and had agreed with the protest against the blackout.

Wikipedia:Babel

en-0This user does not understand English (or understands it with considerable difficulty).

Search user languages

This user is signed up for the Feedback Request Service.

In response to your feedback

Hi guy with the long username,

Glad you joined, let's see if we can help. What are you confused about? If you need help editing:

• Check out the tutorial, it's good.
• If you are impatient to create an article, see the Article Wizard.
• You want a complete manual? Here you go.

It is always a good to enter an edit summary to let other know what you changed or added. Make it concise. See the relevant guideline for details.

Furthermore, you can set your preferences to have an edit link for the first section. See this page and particularly the paragraph Editing before the first section. Let me know if you run into an issue, or contact the Wikipedia Helpdesk. Regards,

Pim Rijkee (talk) 09:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

 

In response to your feedback

Hi.... What exactly are you confused about? I'm happy to help if you let me know.  :) Just click "Talk" after my name and you can leave me a message... or you can leave a message here.

Wikipelli ^Talk 14:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

 

My comment [was] more rhetorical than substantive, in fact. — 99801155KC9TV (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Fair enough. Well, let me know if I can help in any way. Wikipelli ^Talk 15:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 99801155KC9TV. You have new messages at Toddst1's talk page.
Message added 15:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Toddst1 (talk) 15:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:An official symbol of the Church of Ireland.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:An official symbol of the Church of Ireland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 08:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at User talk:190.205.35.210, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Username reports

Just to let you know that complaints about usernames have their own board at WP:UAA - there's no need to go to ANI or ARBCOM with them. Something to remember for next time. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 17:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

One of the user:Nancy's bots would not possibly allow me to do so, as the account had already been blocked for seven (7) days, again by the user:Nancy, and not yet expired. — KC9TV 17:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I hadn't thought of that (although it wasn't a bot under Nancy's control that was removing your report). As for whether there's anything else we can do, I doubt it and I'm not going to do anything further about it personally. Feel free to raise the suggestion at WP:AN to see whether other people have different views - his (now-deleted) user page said this --> (hidden in comment tags to avoid it showing up here, click "edit" to show it) in case you need to refer to it.

The option of requesting an unblock is already included in the blocking notice I left on the editor's talk page. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 18:18, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure why a report went up about an already-blocked user anyway. If it was only a temporary block for say, edit-warring, then yes, the UAA bot would remove it as moot. If it appears to be a long-term username issue, we have requests for comment on username. Emergency situations go to WP:AN. Can't fathom why ArbComm was engaged - any friendly admin would have guided you to the right place :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Cultural differences, I suppose. In the United Kingdom and in Ireland, this would had been treated as the equivalent of a major incident, a "Level-One" threat, of a "rapidly oxidising/oxidizing" nature. Well, I don't know! The man might had been an actual (Irish) Republican terrorist. The Real Irish Republican Army. Or perhaps I was guilty of being over-reacting. Well, who knows! — KC9TV 15:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't know what real world equivalent your thinking of.. but that seems unlikely. Anyway; even though the situation was obviously important Arbcom isn't equipped to deal with emergencies of that nature - as you have now seen. FWIW it's a really really good idea not to speculate about editors, even ones of that nature. Who knows who it is - they are most likely a troll. Bottom line is; take urgent matters to AN, that is the proper venue. --Errant ^(chat!) 15:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Regarding page move Han Jian (Spring and Autumn) => Han Jian (Zhou Dynasty)

Your comment: The title of the article is neither in standard nor in correct English.

Can you link me the wikipedia standard for titles? Thanks, Hanfresco (talk) 01:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

这是翻译错误。"春秋"两字应于音译，不应直译，然而，"春秋"两字是在东亚史，而不是在西欧史，英语社会仍然未知、未接受此两字，所以应该避免，而用其他名称词语代替。— KC9TV 06:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the message, but I asked you for the wiki standard for article titles. Btw, it's easier for me to communicate in English, but if you prefer Chinese, then that's fine too. Hanfresco (talk) 06:25, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

There isn't really one, only a fallible, unwritten general consensus, to tell you the truth, and liable to occasional hoaxes and manipulation. The Trolls would probably tell you otherwise, though. — KC9TV 06:36, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Since the 'standard' is fallible, unwritten, and unreliable, you probably shouldn't cite that as your reason for the move. I won't fight you on it, simply because I don't think Han Jian (Spring and Autumn) is the best title either. I'm not sure why you think "春秋" should be transcribed rather than translated, since the period is well accepted as Spring and Autumn Period. Now if you were to say "Spring and Autumn" isn't descriptive enough and Period should be added to the title, that would be a lot more understandable. Hanfresco (talk) 07:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

In "English", used in China? Yes. In English, used in the without, outside of China? No. The only "Spring" there is are spring rolls. The thing is, the term "Autumn" is NOT used in North America, but the natives use the term "the Fall" instead. The whole thing is just a whole big mistranslation. Also, in correct English, it is "Autumn and Spring" (you see, in English, there is a concept, that words with the letter "a" usually go before words with the letter "s"), not "Spring and Autumn". Wikipedia also CANNOT be used as a primary source. — KC9TV 07:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I do have a problem with "I'm not interested in arguing with you over your ignorance so .... " [1] on my talk page. Saint Patrick was also not an Irishman, of course. — KC9TV 10:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

That's too bad, considering the word ignorance is typically considered neutral. If you take offense in it, well, then I apologize for hurting your sensitivities. Hanfresco (talk) 10:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I also suggest you remove the complaint made here, at least temporarily. It's written on that page the following: Before posting a grievance about a user here, please discuss the issue with them on their user talk page, even in cases of possible misuse of administrator privileges. which you have clearly not done. Hanfresco (talk) 10:34, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Not done. — KC9TV 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Too bad, it's poorly-considered, IMHO. (By the way, we in North America do use the word "Autumn", and of course it comes after Spring due to the order of the seasons: Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter). (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:17, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Why doesn't he just come out and defend himself, Marquess of Queensbury's Rules and all that? 'Cause he can't, and he/"they" know(s) it! I would rather not go into the details of this case too much. (Anyway, yes, of course some in Canada do use some of those more "British" words, especially those to the East of Manitoba. Especially those in Newfoundland and those in parts of Nova Scotia, and some English-speaking groups in the Province of Quebec, I believe. Never had a chance to go to that fair Country of yours, as of yet, other than meeting with a person with fair hair, and of the fair sex, in a certain place of worship just outside of my local University. It is a shame that there are not more of the likes of hers from the Dominions or the Old Commonwealth.

Anyway, this is really more a matter of linguistics. The Jesuits probably had forgotten to tell the Chinese that there are different kinds of translation, and that it is just plain daft to attempt to make a literal translation of most historical terms. Chinese is not Latin, Italian, French, Dutch or German. Even terms in Gaelic, Irish and Scottish, are often left as they are, untranslated, even if they are usually Anglicised. Well, if they had intended to wind me up by throwing up a lot of nonsense, then they certainly had succeeded.) — KC9TV 12:01, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Protection request of Delia School of Canada, Hong Kong

Hi there! I've just declined your protection request of Delia School of Canada, Hong Kong. Could you ask the protecting admin Alison (talk · contribs), as she has better knowledge of this particular article. Thanks. GedUK  11:54, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:Mikkalai

Hello 99801155KC9TV. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Mikkalai, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: User talk pages are not normally deleted - see WP:DELTALK. . Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Mukadderat

Hello 99801155KC9TV. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Mukadderat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: can't see how deleting this would be useful. Take to MFD if you wish. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 21:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Cigarette holder

Please don't tag the entire article as a hoax. I'm pretty sure cigarette holders actually exist. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 14:27, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

• Not the Japanese bit, no. — KC9TV 14:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Be very careful of using others' talkpages to accuse them of hoaxing. I would be very happy to report you for such behavior.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:42, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

• Well, go on then! This is a dare! I had been to Japan, at least three times in fact, and this is a blatant hoax. Women in Japan do not even usually smoke! — KC9TV 15:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Improper warnings

Please don't give user's false warnings, like you did at User talk:Chillllls. Chillllls was communicating with Moonriddengirl appropriately, about a matter directly related to Wikipedia. Warning people inappropriately and aggressively can, if done often, be considered a kind of harassment. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:20, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

¡Forward, Russia!

I've been through about half of the sources listed on the talk page. I'll go through the rest tomorrow. Before deleting any more information from the article please consider whether it's likely to be possible to source it. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I see. Well, very well, but do we really have to bring up "Katie's" University life again into this, et cetera, even if it were to be sourced? BLP (and a bit too paedestrian/gossipy, I think). Just really doesn't sound too NPOV, even if it were to be sourced. I am also thinking of Google Cache (and the equivalents with Yahoo and with Microsoft's MSN Bing) and of the Internet Archive. — KC9TV 17:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

RfC

I don't think this is a good idea and have brought it to ANI. Dougweller (talk) 08:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

It's been removed, please don't put it back. As said there, an AfD is a request for comment on the article. Dougweller (talk) 08:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Got your email, thanks for clarification and self-insight. But you really should try to fix it if you are really worried about it, it is very very unlikely it will be deleted, and it can be sourced. I've been fixing worse this last week. Dougweller (talk) 09:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy delete

Please do not place speedy delete tags on userpages that have been tagged as suspicious. The tags are valid, an admin is not required to place them, and the editor who put them there has as close to administrative rights as you can get without being an actual admin. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Midcent

Hello 99801155KC9TV, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Midcent, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: So what? Indef is not infinite, and there's literally nothing on the userpage worth deleting. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

All-right, calm down! — KC9TV 13:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

What do you mean "calm down"? Interesting that I drop by here and see you were warned about the same thing 2 days ago. Stop tagging userpages for deletion: final warning. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

British mannerism. Sorry. Fair enough; and no need to spell it out! Anyway, I am also at the moment having a fever. Perhaps I may be forgiven? P.S.: You are not a CheckUser by any chance? — KC9TV 13:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Asuka 120% Burning Fest.. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 13:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I see that you are fighting sock puppetry there, so I have retracted my warning. Elizium23 (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Strange SPI report

Can you explain why you created Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Benlisquare? Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, I don't think using an IP to vote twice is ever allowed. — KC9TV 20:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

He didn't, as far as I can see. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Not according to this, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_June_23#BEST_KOREA (Special:Contributions/220.245.209.35), although not technically of course. Well, I hope not. CheckUser cannot be used in this instance anyhow. Funnily enough, (Australian) IPs were also used, one from his self-proclaimed University, James Cook Polytechnic/University, during his blocking discussions in the Japanese Wikipedia (ja:Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/Benlisquare) ([2]), for which he was personally warned not to do so again ("警告を無視"; "審議妨害"). — KC9TV 22:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop this now. The guy did nothing wrong, so please stop digging around in his old IPs and two-year-old edits. This really serves no purpose, and may easily come across as harassment. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)