User talk:KoshVorlon

• VorlonHomeWorld
• BabCom (Talk )
• The Book of Vorlon
• JumpGate
• My Userboxen
• Atlas of the Planets
• My Barnstars
• Awards I've recieved
• The Grey Council (Chat )

This editor is a WikiGnome. GFL - GNOME FOR LIFE C H A P T E R 11 "This spot blank for now " . Reply from the Cap'n Hello, KoshVorlon. You have new messages at Captain Screebo's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Talkback Hello, KoshVorlon. You have new messages at Skamecrazy123's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Stubs Kolaras Daboh And Thereby Hangs a Tale Kothi, Satna Kannod Hof Aza Regional Council The Snow Queen (Lackey novel) Satwas HTML sanitization Izumiōtsu, Osaka Evil Hat Productions Badarwas Amanganj College of Nursing, Trivandrum, Kerala Randy Emberlin President of the State of Palestine Alan Hillgarth Chandla Barela Cleanup Mildred Shay Select Bus Service PRINCE2 Merge Victimless crime Mazda 929 Mazda MX-6 Add Sources Ancient One Dorothy Shay Bodoni Wikify Solarlite Médaille commémorative de la guerre 1939–1945 Turkish Cultural Center Expand Mazda Demio Twinkie History of Jordan SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Wikipedia User 72.14.77.206 I see that you had given this guy User_talk:72.14.77.206 a "last warning" a while back to stop vandalizing pages. Well, they are back to their old tricks again recently. I don't think I've seen a constructive edit from this IP address at all in recent months. I'll leave it to you as to what to do next. Thanx. Guy1890 (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC) Whack! Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 06:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC) No problem....trout are tasty!!! Nomnom  :)  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  21:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC) You cannot learn Wikipedia by rote, it is not a set of rules but rather a system of ideas. This is a total repeat of the last time I interacted with you, you seem to think that just throwing around policy links is a substitute for reasoned argument or consensus, even if you have failed to read and understand the policy link you are referring to. From WP:NOTBLOG, which you cite again and again as if it made everything clear: "Personal web pages. Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account. The focus of user pages should not be social networking, or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration. Humorous pages that refer to Wikipedia in some way may be created in an appropriate namespace, however." I don't see that Rich was using the page to work on his resume or post vast amounts of material not related to Wikipedia. I would again remind you that it is a good idea to read things thoroughly before deciding they support your position and simply pointing to them again and again as if that is all that need be said. You don't seem to have noticed that these discussions tend not to end the way you think they will. That should be an indication to you that you were/are incorrect/out of step with consensus on these issues. Despite whatever obscure point you were trying to make with those useless links on my talk page, consensus is in fact the primary decision making model on Wikipedia. How do I know that? I actually read the page WP:CONSENSUS and that is the very first thing that it says. WP:IAR also allows us to ignore policies if following them is not determined to benefit the project. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Warning There will be only this one warning. If you mess with the policy once more [1], you will be blocked. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Mainspace work Hello there. I just stopped by to ask if you'd like to do some mainspace work. Consider creating a few articles from Wikipedia:Requested articles/Images. I'd be more than happy to work with you. Non-controversial mainspaces are much more fun than back pages any day. Let me know. It's a nice path -- a good way to leave troubles behind. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the invite. I usually don't work with images as I don't understand them well. I usually stick to reverting vandalism. (Been at bit busy at work (I contribute at work ) so I haven't had a chance to do that much... but I will shortly. Thanks !  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  14:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Suggested changes Kosh, I'm considering going to the significant trouble of creating an RFC/U about you in the next few days. In the interests of saving me, and you, and the larger community some time and ill will, I wonder if you'd be willing to voluntarily agree to do the following: Stop censoring/hatting/archiving/altering comments by anyone (anywhere except your own talk page, where you can remove but not alter them) Limit yourself to WP:0RR Avoid starting deletion discussions of any kind (although I wouldn't say you can't participate in those started by others) Discontinue a discussion if 3 users in good standing have told you that you should drop it, and no one has supported your position None of this is intended to prevent you from warning, reporting, and/or reverting vandals as often as necessary. I've never seen any significant errors in your anti-vandalism work, and you do enough of it that it is a significant benefit to the encyclopedia. If I do start an RFC/U, I'll be justifying these restrictions with a significant number of examples, but at this early stage, I'm hoping it will suffice to remind you that your edits in these areas are very, very often undone, and that you ultimately prevail in very, very few of them. You may think you're right and everyone else is wrong, but surely you can see that if that's the case, you should stop doing it anyway, right? Let me know your thoughts. I could be wrong, of course, but I really suspect the result of an RFC/U would be something along these lines anyway, possibly more severe, and definitely more painful for everyone involved. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Sounds fair to me. I agree to your conditions. Regarding point #2, I understand you mean that to be with no exceptions, however, how about exemption BLP and obvious vandalism ?  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  20:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Like I said in my last bullet point, obvious vandalism would be exempt; you do a great job of recognizing obvious vandalism (and 0RR and anti-vandalism work are 100% incompatible anyway!). Regarding BLP, my concern is that your interpretation of BLP doesn't seem to match a lot of other people's. I could try to find examples if needed. That said, if the BLP violation is egregious and in article space, then revert it once and I wouldn't complain. But if an established editor does something you think violates BLP, please ask an admin to look at it, rather than remove it yourself. Would that work? --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC) NO need to find examples..... I accept 0RR on BLP as well.  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  20:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Great, thanks, I wasn't looking forward to an RFC/U. I suppose a virtual handshake is in order. Cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC) No problem, I've placed the restrictions on top so mizabot won't archive them.  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  20:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC) If you see comments that really need altering, or deletion discussions that really need starting, let me know and I'll take a look, and act if I think it's wise, and explain why if I don't think it's wise. No guarantees I'll agree, and (depending on my mood) I probably won't be open to a long discussion about it, but at least there's an out if you really think you see something wrong. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Ok... no problem (and no problem on correcting the typo's either  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  21:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Stubs The Dark Tower (play) Piploda Churhat Jasmine Nightdreams Baikunthpur, Rewa Madman theory Mercedes-Benz Connection Bert Sommer Outposts: Journeys to the Surviving Relics of the British Empire Boda, Rajgarh Hans Christian Andersen: My Life as a Fairytale Shahpur, Burhanpur Sultanpur, Madhya Pradesh Cost sharing Manasa, Madhya Pradesh Jirapur AFNOR Mahroni Shock Treatment (Edgar Winter album) Cleanup Subhan'Allah Doctor Doom Florida State Road A1A Merge Badarpur, Uttar Pradesh Mazda Capella History of the Arab–Israeli conflict Add Sources Borders of Israel Proposals for a Palestinian state Hawazin Wikify ¡Uno! Several Things Ahab the Arab Expand Arguments for and against drug prohibition Harry Dresden (TV character) Timeline of the Fatah–Hamas conflict SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)