Jump to content

Talk:Turkic peoples: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 72: Line 72:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkic_peoples&diff=951502155&oldid=950856494 This] was removed due to sockpuppetry, but I think if the content pass as reliable, we better restore them. {{Ping|Erminwin|Queenplz|Steve Quinn}} Your opinion? --[[User:Wario-Man|Wario-Man]] ([[User talk:Wario-Man|talk]]) 03:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkic_peoples&diff=951502155&oldid=950856494 This] was removed due to sockpuppetry, but I think if the content pass as reliable, we better restore them. {{Ping|Erminwin|Queenplz|Steve Quinn}} Your opinion? --[[User:Wario-Man|Wario-Man]] ([[User talk:Wario-Man|talk]]) 03:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{re|Wario-Man}} I'm OK with restoring the content. I think it is a good idea. ---[[User:Steve Quinn|Steve Quinn]] ([[User talk:Steve Quinn|talk]]) 23:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{re|Wario-Man}} I'm OK with restoring the content. I think it is a good idea. ---[[User:Steve Quinn|Steve Quinn]] ([[User talk:Steve Quinn|talk]]) 23:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{re|Wario-Man}} Agreed. [[User:Erminwin|Erminwin]] ([[User talk:Erminwin|talk]]) 03:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:56, 31 May 2020

Merger proposal

Proposal

Merge Turkic migration into Turkic peoples; basically the same topics, with the same info. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Well, who's going to do the job, then? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - per Joshua Jonathan, but it has to be noted that also in the Turkic people article we should also outline which people are of proven Turkic origin and in which case it is just one of the many assumptions, without clear evidence, and according to that proportion to expand or shorten per WP:DUE.(KIENGIR (talk) 17:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

* Support - per Joshua Jonathan. Turkic migration article is short and mostly whitout references, it will be more value on turkic peoples page and there you can rewrite and put ref on, I also support KIENGIR´s idea MeLoveGames (talk) 15:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above user was a sockpuppet. --Wario-Man (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2020

I would like to change a sentence "The first known mention of the term Turk (Old Turkic: 𐰰𐰼𐰇𐱅‎ Türük, 𐰰𐰼𐰇𐱅‎:𐰜𐰇𐰛 Kök Türük or 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰚‎ Türk; meaning "origin")[33][34][35][36] applied to a Turkic group was in reference to the Göktürks in the 6th century."

to

"The first known mention of the term Turk (Old Turkic: 𐰰𐰼𐰇𐱅‎ Türük, 𐰰𐰼𐰇𐱅‎:𐰜𐰇𐰛 Kök Türük or 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰚‎ Türk; meaning "origin")[34] was in reference to the Göktürks in the Khüis Tolgoi inscription probably not later than 587 AD (https://www.academia.edu/39809819/Groping_in_the_Dark_The_First_Attempt_to_Interpret_the_Bugut_Br%C4%81hm%C4%AB_Inscription)." RavenKhar (talk) 18:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partially added, Changed probably to most-likely! JAZHAZHANDZWIKI (talk) 19:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Map

@Joshua Jonathan: The map you restored here is problematic. The image is also tagged for being inaccurate on Wiki Commons and I am not the only editor who has been cautioning against using this map. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aman Kumar Goel: thanks; I see. Regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

This was removed due to sockpuppetry, but I think if the content pass as reliable, we better restore them. @Erminwin, Queenplz, and Steve Quinn: Your opinion? --Wario-Man (talk) 03:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wario-Man: I'm OK with restoring the content. I think it is a good idea. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 23:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wario-Man: Agreed. Erminwin (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]